VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > VCD > Catch Me If You Can *iNTERNAL* - DVD SCR - V4F
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Druck
Not Yet

Guest

just what i needed. hells yeah v4f

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:39 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Aff
Sep 2002

Member

why?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:39 AM
Aff is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Aff Click here to Send Aff a Private Message Find more posts by Aff Add Aff to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
opso
Not Yet

Guest

Fuckin homos Startin group wars baha good luck you screener season losers.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:41 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Jaded4Ten
Jan 2002

Member

Well the nfo seems to state that tcf encodes like shit ... bold statement.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:42 AM
Jaded4Ten is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Jaded4Ten Click here to Send Jaded4Ten a Private Message Find more posts by Jaded4Ten Add Jaded4Ten to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
m-drew
Not Yet

Guest

'TCF can't encode for jackshit, so here's our internal rip to save the day. Better luck next time fella's'

Ummm. TCF's version was excellent and quicker then yours.

Why did V4F waste their time encoding this?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:43 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
PCPhreak
Not Yet

Guest

My guess is that because the TCF release was PAl. But I can't complain about the quality or speed of their release.

Funny, I just finished getting the TCF release. Seeing as it will take a while for this to get out on IRC and usenet, is there any way I can encode this to NTSC? Will TMPGenc work?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 11:20 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
TheHacker
Not Yet

Guest

well. i agree with them TCF cant encode

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 11:34 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
crash_ohverload
Not Yet

Guest

I am The President of Cookie World.. and We like cookies, chocolate ones... :-) .. btw, TCF is better...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 11:38 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
realized
Not Yet

Guest

made up .nfo

thats not the original nfo, prob edited buy an upset admin..


real nfo:

code:
Û Rip-Info Û ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ Video Bitrate - 2095 Audio Bitrate - 224 Video Resolution - 480 x 480 Standard - NTSC * Please Do not Mind the Screw up On the SFV for CD1 we checked it and extracts just perfectly, enjoy the film* Û Group Information Û ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛ Wazup!! You think you can be in V4F? Here is your chance, we are looking for people that live in Malaysia/Asia/USA and have access to Un-Released TS, SCR, and DVD's. We are also looking for T3+, 20+ gig dumps!! We DO NOT need any couriers at the moment so please, do not ask. If you think you can be helpful to us, or can donate computer equipment, please email us at [email protected].

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 12:30 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
|sw1tch|
Not Yet

Guest

v4f wouldnt post something like that in their nfo.
they are not that stupid

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 01:01 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dvdmatty
May 2002

Junior Member

If V4F did say that well its not gonna get them the respect that TCF have built up.

On the NTSC thing. coming from the UK and being in the PAL Region i was very grateful for a PAL Release not that it bothers me, i have a convertor neway.

BiG_Uk

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 01:18 PM
dvdmatty is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dvdmatty Click here to Send dvdmatty a Private Message Find more posts by dvdmatty Add dvdmatty to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dEEKAy
Nov 2002

Junior Member

Lightbulb

that sucks that there is no jpeg but i guess since its a screener we dont really need one.....

dk

__________________
Keep It Brutal

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 05:40 PM
dEEKAy is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dEEKAy Click here to Send dEEKAy a Private Message Find more posts by dEEKAy Add dEEKAy to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
manwh0re
Not Yet

Guest

FOR THE LAME ASS PERSON WHO TOOK V4F'S NFO AND RE-WROTE IT IS PRETTY PATHETIC. THE CENTURIES THAT V4F HAS BEEN HERE, THEY HAVE NEVER BASHED ANYONE, OR HATED ON ANOTHER GROUP. FOR AL THOSE THAT CONTINUE TO SUPPORT US THANK YOU. AND IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE *REAL* NFO, YOU KNOW WHERE TO FIND IT.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 07:49 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
vorbis
Not Yet

Guest

not sure there was much of a reason for another release. the tcf one was ok. Oh well I suppose its internal. As for the divx issue, i didn't think pho was a troll. Divx/xvid is a superiour format to the bitrate hungry svcd. I've always found divx movies look quite well. Also watching a widescreen movie on a 19" monitor makes little difference to watching it on the 21" tv we have. Svcd is handy for dvd players but mpeg 4 ones will be afforordable pretty soon. Also pho, divx can have multiple audio tracks and removable subtitles (ever heard of dvobsub).

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 08:24 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
your name her
Jul 2002


A.K.A OrGaZm

why this????? the tcf version was fine

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????


Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 09:59 PM
your name her is offline Click Here to See the Profile for your name her Click here to Send your name her a Private Message Find more posts by your name her Add your name her to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rvwinkle
Not Yet

Guest

CENSORED

Well apparently in the rush to get all the flame wars over divx removed from this topic my previous comments concerning the inflammatory remarks in this .nfo were removed. I see several comments that those remarks were fake and that this nfo has been altered. If that is the case then why is the fake nfo still linked off the main page ?

Get us the right nfo linked before more people read this and get pissed over something that is not even real.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:28 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
SiKzNuGz
Not Yet

Guest

TCF's encode was pretty good I watched it last night and didnt notice anything other then minor imperfections. I saw the sample of V4F and didnt think it was any better but I saw it on the monitor not the 52" that I watched TCF version. BTW thats fucked up what was done to the nfo, whats the point just drags your REP down when you deface a groups nfo!

V4F Vid Bitrate - 2095 Rez - 480 x 480 NTSC
TCF Vid Bitrate - 2190kbit avg. 2450kbit max. Rez - 480 x 560 PAL

P.S. Jebus! STFU, all of you! The last like 10 post have had nothing to do with the rls at all. Why do you give a damn about what format others use. Each format has it's own pluses and minuses so pick whats best for you and let others do the same or make a new thread (Divx/Xvid vs X/SVCD).

Last edited by SiKzNuGz on 01-06-2003 at 11:26 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:36 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
SiKzNuGz
Not Yet

Guest

Timing...

Ignore my P.S. comments on the post above. The thread has been cleaned since written. TY

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 10:39 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
backoff
Not Yet

Guest

Unhappy

I wouldnt diss TCF they have always given us good stuff. I have never gotten a release by you guys, other than this one of course, but all of the TCF movies I have are great quality and always encoded nicely. Your internal rip is not bad, but dont diss the other group just because they got it before you. You could have just said you think yours is better because it is NTSC or something, but saying their encodes are shit is pretty gay.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 11:50 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ArchdemoN
Not Yet

Guest

TCF owns the SVCD scene easily.

DVL owns the DIVX scene easily.

nuff said.

this was not off their own source, they re-encoded.
lamers, flaming tcf, when they recoded ;-/

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-06-2003 11:54 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdquality.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.