i hate people who rate by picture

i got the sample and it looks only a little bit better then the ftf, better color but the picture is kinda out of focus as if it is a auto focused cam...

the sound is of a cam and not of a auz hookup(ts)

whatever

__________________
ehhhhh

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by ScabbyDoo


they are not stating proper reasons because they didnt lable is as a proper

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by backoff
I think this movie sucked really bad, so if you REALLY REALLY like stupid fucking Star Trek maybe you will like this, but I fell asleep when I went to see it in the theatres.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr_Grinch


Maybe it was Cam'd, recorded to vhs and then converted to mpg.

Anyway, I didn't like this film much but judging by the sample it looks like the best release yet. As someone said though, sample's can be missleading.

---

ok ok non-dv cam then.... but look closely it does look like its been cammed with a non-dv cam

__________________
cC.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Natural


it's implied. there is no other reason for their read-nfo, other than to explain why it's better than the other ts'

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Serpentor


Implied Natural, or implode?

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

why are you fools arguing about polotics? WHO CARES WHAT THE DAMN TAG IN THE RLS NAME IS??!?! maybe some anal jerkass nuker cares, but nobody else does. they just like quality releases. they're not gonna care whether someone put readnfo or proper.

i just checked the sample. great silver XV... the colors are almost perfect, it's much crisper than most telesyncs, there's no bleeding, and the sound is audible although a bit "tinny." thanks XV, i'll be downloading this for sure. and anything is better than an ftf cam. thanks!

8/7/haven't watched movie yet

__________________
retired from the scene, but still leechin!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by strawhair
maybe we should only be allowed to vote between 2/2/2 and 9/9/9 because i havent done all 10's or all 1's but allegedly i have done this and have been banned from voting?.
could somebody explain to me what is the point of having the out of 10 voting system if we are not allowed to vote for some releases how we see fit-it kind of renders the whole thing pointless?.
i await the usual mature replies
however- 3/4/3

---

__________________
-- Kaz

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Ya this release sucks pretty bad. Don't bother.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

::::::The source is from a cam cuz there's peoples head in front of the screen during the movie.. On the 1st and second cd's, the last 20 minutes, the audio went out of sync and the video kept screwing....... I rate this 4/4/9::::::::::



(b) This makes sense to take time viewing what people take for granted.......

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

The whole thing is messed up - shame, cos went to see this in the Cinema and it's rather good.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

for the record it also has the same audio gaps that the ftf version had. well not gaps really, more like missing sfx...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged