K-FurY
Apr 2002
 Senior Member
|
quote: Originally posted by alundrety
but there are quality groups out there other then ctp that IMO have better suppliers
ie: UTI, TCF
though Tcf has not really been distributing TS's thier VCD realese of 8 mile far exceeded IMO quality of any ctp SVCD
and yet IMO, centropy seems to get this super big hype for making thier ts in svcd
and UTI has done the best period
think of LOTR, HP:COS, etc, plus they have realese far more quality realeses in the past 2 years then ctp
meh, i just dont agree with you. tcf has had 3 public rls' spanned over a 3.5 month period (well actually they were all internal but anyways..) and 8 mile was the only one that had very excellent quality. dont get me wrong the hot chick and kangaroo jack were above average, but there was just too much flickering, u just cannot compare that too ctp's rls' of insomnia, scooby doo, swep3, spiderman, etc, etc. and uti, omg, i dont see what u ppl see in this group. their ttt rls was ass, the idiot dropped the camera like 3 times, picture was grainy and insanely dark in dark scenes and insanely bright in bright scenes. not to mention the constant coughing/popcorn chewing in the background. and altho ctp isnt releasing stuff with the same quality that we're used to seeing from them, its still 10x better then the shitty silvers we get from groups like esoteric, pv, sws, etc, etc. but i do agree with what the above person said, svcd is not necessary for these releases. unless they can get up to the quality they were releasing at before, i see no need for svcd. not the whole cd thing (altho that is an issue for longer movies) its just the damn bandwidth issue. some of us have shitty ips with caps etc and just cant afford to waste it on a 1.6 gig svcd when we could have had a 1 gig vcd. anyways thats my rant, call me a ctp cock sucker, i dont care.
Last edited by K-FurY on 02-10-2003 at 12:42 AM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|