VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > VCD > Star Trek Nemesis - SCREENER - VERiTY
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Heflink
Nov 2002

SARS Patient

Quality is not the best. The sound is okay but the video is grainy. Looks like a vhs screener to me, but I dont know enough about telecine to say whether or not it is one.

Best release so far, thats all I can say.

5/7/6

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-10-2003 08:54 PM
Heflink is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Heflink Click here to Send Heflink a Private Message Find more posts by Heflink Add Heflink to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
buttheaduk
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by Heflink
. Looks like a vhs screener to me, but I dont know enough about telecine to say whether or not it is one.
5/7/6



Maybe it is a VHS Screener

btw who said it was a telecine?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-10-2003 09:07 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CaptainPooHat
Feb 2003


Captainus Poohatus

quote:
Originally posted by buttheaduk


Maybe it is a VHS Screener

btw who said it was a telecine?



CinapS did

im not gettin this rls simply because of the commercials ..'AS GOOD AS STARWARS' ..my ass. theres no way its that good, but i'm easily persuaded i suppose so ill wait for a better rls or...dare i say...the dvd ..might be worth the rental.

6/7/waaaaaiting~

__________________
Saving the world from danger with a piece of shit on my head.


Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-10-2003 10:52 PM
CaptainPooHat is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CaptainPooHat Click here to Send CaptainPooHat a Private Message Visit CaptainPooHat's homepage! Find more posts by CaptainPooHat Add CaptainPooHat to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
daz..griff
Not Yet

Guest

Unhappy

not bad alot better than the last 1.. thats about it.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 12:21 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
X400
Dec 2002

Registered

the last star wars sucked.. even phantom menace was eghhh but not as bad as this last one omg it was sad last 45mins was the only good part in the star wars flick


star trek on the other hand this isnt one of their stonger movies but its still a better watch then the last star wars movie

release kinda looks like it was recorded from a shitty vhs tape
but still worth it if you cant wait another month? for the dvd
7/7.5/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 01:25 AM
X400 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for X400 Click here to Send X400 a Private Message Find more posts by X400 Add X400 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
pHizZ
Jan 2003


Reggie loves tacos.

i'm pretty sure its VHS screener. Looks like a copy of a copy; the ripping could have been a lot better.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 01:33 AM
pHizZ is offline Click Here to See the Profile for pHizZ Click here to Send pHizZ a Private Message Find more posts by pHizZ Add pHizZ to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CcZ
Feb 2003

Advil Addict

This is, no matter what it is (ts, tc, scr, cam), the best release of this movie yet. It is not excellent quality and property signs get in the way and it's a little grainy, but it's definitly the best release yet. As for a dvd screener or rip, this movie is supposed to come out on dvd/vhs on May 13th as says this web site: http://www.trektoday.com/news/070203_01.shtml
The dvd rip and screener shouldn't be that far away so i'd suggest waiting (expect it late feb-early april) until a better one comes out unless your a die hard fan!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 01:54 AM
CcZ is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CcZ Click here to Send CcZ a Private Message Visit CcZ's homepage! Find more posts by CcZ Add CcZ to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
LiQuIdMuNkY
Oct 2002

Registered

I see that it has been nuked on numerous sites that i am on, but not all, very strange, I thought it was alright quality, definatly watchable.

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 05:56 AM
LiQuIdMuNkY is offline Click Here to See the Profile for LiQuIdMuNkY Click here to Send LiQuIdMuNkY a Private Message Visit LiQuIdMuNkY's homepage! Find more posts by LiQuIdMuNkY Add LiQuIdMuNkY to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
FOS
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by VCD_MAD
WOW about time we got a good release of this movie

keep up the good work .


p.s

can one of the vcdquality member fix my voting privileges out plz

Your voting privileges have been revoked for abuse...
click here to explain why you voted 1/1/1 or 10/10/10's..


NOT TRUE

cos i allways vote fair



fag.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 07:27 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
coathanger
Not Yet

Guest

Just saw the sample, If thats a screener then they need to let someonlse rip it

Last edited by coathanger on 02-13-2003 at 02:46 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 08:25 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
sickdick
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by CinapS



If you weren’t so stupid you would know telecines are also made by production companies and some do have property labels you idiot. Get your shit straight before you post.



lol what a dork
go read the definition of telecine
its a copy made digitally from the REELs!!
which stupid production company puts copyright messages on the REELS ? u have any idea how much that cost?
haha, idiot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 09:18 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
alundrety
Apr 2002


<3's Jack Valenti

quote:
Originally posted by TabascoJoe
You think we have a DVD screener by now


ditto

__________________
ehhhhh

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 10:30 AM
alundrety is offline Click Here to See the Profile for alundrety Click here to Send alundrety a Private Message Find more posts by alundrety Add alundrety to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
blacks
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by sickdick


lol what a dork
go read the definition of telecine
its a copy made digitally from the REELs!!
which stupid production company puts copyright messages on the REELS ? u have any idea how much that cost?
haha, idiot



No offence, but he is right. Production companies do make telecines.
What you fail to see is the bigger picture. the copyright messages are not on the reels, but rather a post-telecining addition. Btw, most screeners are made from telecine method. Just a data transfer.
And as for your costs argument, come on, we are talking about the big players here. Not some porn film production crew.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 12:56 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
sweetsour
Not Yet

Guest

I don't think that nowadays any production company makes telecines... The telecines around are pirate stuff.
So the property msgs mean that it is a screener..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 01:15 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
nikelrah
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by sweetsour
I don't think that nowadays any production company makes telecines... The telecines around are pirate stuff.
So the property msgs mean that it is a screener..



well, if they don't shoot the whole thing digital they have to transfer it from the reels -> vhs/dvd etc at some point

[general rant]

but i don't really see the fuss about the whole Screener/Telecine issue. Quality wise a Telecine can be better than a commercial Screener (JP3 anyone?) and vice-versa. Also in most cases Screeners are still made by telecining the reels, so it's technically the same.

I think VideoCD(?) just introduced the Telecine-Tag for low-standard/very early/heavy watermarked screeners. I also find it rather amusing that some people even claim a release is a Telecine just because it has a counter/serial. Some Screeners have counters, some don't, some Telecines have "property of" messages, some don't. So everyone please stop pulling things out of your ass when you obbiously don't really have a clue. Imho it's almost impossible to tell if something is a "real" Screener or "just" a Telecine just from the encode itself.

[/general rant].

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 04:02 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Mak Man
Not Yet

Guest

Who cares if it's nuked, it's still the best copy i've seen out there.

Good job VERiTY!

Mak.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 04:16 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
sickdick
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by aXs-SVCD
Just got the sample, this movie is alot better Quality then first and 2nd rls!!!!, sound got alot better, Quality is alright worth downloading....

( NUKED EVERYWHERE )

- Not VCD complaint


VERiTY repak it please

Thanx for bringing a good movie VERiTY



this is how i fixed it
extracted mpg from bin/cue using vcdgear then followed by extracting the mpg in tmpeg and remuxing in tmpg by selecting mpeg1 vcd compliant, then burning the mpeg in nero
works fine for me that way

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 07:07 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
WeBMaSTeR
Not Yet

Guest

VERY poor quality for a screener. Looks like a TS (I know it isn't).

While the best out there - it still sux !!!

Should have viewed it before I burnt it - just wasted a couple of CD's

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-11-2003 11:23 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
elmo
Not Yet

Guest

damn webmaster WASTED cds? geeze i aint seen you out on any street corners *flicks you 50p* i know i know cd's are oh so exp

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-12-2003 12:34 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
coathanger
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by WeBMaSTeR
VERY poor quality for a screener. Looks like a TS (I know it isn't).

While the best out there - it still sux !!!

Should have viewed it before I burnt it - just wasted a couple of CD's



Have you ever heard of cd-rw. If the quality is crap all you have lost is burning time.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-12-2003 12:50 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.