quote:

---

Originally posted by reverend
It's great to see Centropy well and truly back and striving for quality again. However, is the mission statement of the *new CTP* to only release the worst in mall-rat fodder hollywood flicks? They seem to be concentrating on releasing only the most mindless drivel that the movie industry has to offer.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

holy shit! Boner!
Thanx ctp, I watched sample and it pwned like the last 4 ts' but i must say this movie is soooooo shitty, its not worth the dl!
8/8.5/0.0005

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

personally, i'd take a little grain over funny angles. i don't know. at least with a grainy picture you don't really notice it after a while, but that angle thing is really persistent. heh. doesn't ever start to blend really... naw mean ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i agree. CTP is fucking up largly with the angle. the quality of the video is very good, everything is readable/viewable. the sound is great, but that angle just fucks everything up. even the old spiderman and star wars II were a little grainy, but i perfered that over bowed picture. scoot back guys or get the camera higher. or better yet, take some pointers from TCF. their bringing down the house was pretty much the best i've seen as far as a TS.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Natural
personally, i'd take a little grain over funny angles. i don't know. at least with a grainy picture you don't really notice it after a while, but that angle thing is really persistent. heh. doesn't ever start to blend really... naw mean ?

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by phoR20


what are you saying?

u must have not seen CTP's releases from last summer ...NO BLUE TINTS, NO ANGLES, NEAR PERFECTION.

judging from sample
7.5/8/?

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

6/6/8

nice rls

personal i'd rather watch it with a blue tint, than the angle, but i'm grateful either way


Update:

After watching this for a second time, that angle thing is alot more off putting thatn the blue, it looks like the opening credits to star wars throughout the film.

I think CTP should change there blue intro to :

Long time ago in a Far away galaxy......

Bring back the blue fellas

Last edited by SeeDee on 03-28-2003 at 06:00 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by phoR20


what are you saying?

u must have not seen CTP's releases from last summer ...NO BLUE TINTS, NO ANGLES, NEAR PERFECTION.

judging from sample
7.5/8/?

---

__________________
hah- kids want violence- get them sick of it at a young age, then they won't be looking for it when they're older- providing them with panzy-ass kangaroos and other shit like that just makes them want to beat the shit outta the homos that make it..... well maybe the kids dont, - but i sure as hell do!
From {Kangaroo Jack - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC}

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I am glad I waited. I knew someone will be able to do a better job than the one released by FTF.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This Is Madd Fucking Nice Much Better Then Their The Hunted I Love This Release Thanks Centropy 9/8/10 - Movie Kicks Ass

__________________
Children Of Dune RULED

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I think the angle is very annoying. But I do agree it is still a good release and I appreciate them being on the scene again. The colors on this one look a little faded (it looks like the whole thing was filmed on a rainy day). The sound is great, and it is a pretty clear copy (much much much better than the FTF version). Sometimes you don't notice the angle at all, but then they show a close up of something, or there is something in the foreground and it is awful. This is definatly watchable though. Prolly the best copy you'll see until there is an unwatermarked screener. Thanks again guys. Move that guy back a few rows and we'll be back in business.
MrSin

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

great for a TS by far. picture bothered me because it was like it was shot from the front row.

sounds was superb for a TS

The Hunted was better

7.5/8/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Grabbed the sample and it looks great.
8.5/ 8.5/?

Getting the movie now.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Not bad at all..very watchable and hopefully enjoyable

Just popped it in the ole DVD player..so far the rating is

7/8/?

__________________
"If somebody said to me, in twelve years you’ll be in a band with your brother and two carrot munching geezers who don’t like football, I would've said 'fuck off, I’m not joining the Bee Gees." -Noel Gallagher 2005

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

you sure the angle prob aint from hooking up a cam to the projector for the t/s and not taking into account the super 35 format this film is in?

the jpeg looks exactly like an anamorphic dvd that hasn't been "stretched" ..... on an anamorphic tv .....

or more like an anamorphic dvd on a non-anamorphic tv that the dvd player hasn't been set to 4/3 lbx, but left at 16x9 - - i.e., the peeps on the screen are tall and skinny.

im going by the jpeg, and comparing it to Tears in the Sun, where the actors heads tapered at the top which made Tears look like a distance from the screen capture problem for CTP, this one - TheCore - looks like a prob with cam settings .

just my stupid 2c worth.

but keep em coming, CTP, no body does it bettah !!

gotta luv those colors in the jpg, and besides, what's not to like about a phallic ship penetrating the hot molten core of mutha earth ? ..... hehe science fiction fantazy rUleZ

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this is not really a big complaint... this rls was definitely watchable. but what's up with the framerate? i'm surprised it's at NTSC, considering it doesn't really have a flicker to it... but i can't see them doing a PAL>NTSC conversion, when there's no need to...

also, what's up with the field mismatch? if you notice, all the scene changes have mismatched fields, you can see both scenes at once. i almost want to say 'bad ivtc', but i just can't figure out why they'd ivtc a cam, unless it was filmed at NTSC rate to begin with... but if so, i'm very surprised that there's no flicker to speak of...

hrm... well, to my mind, this is one of the lower quality ctp releases i've seen, even from this year. the angle is bad, it makes it look like the AR is way off.. and the weird field matching is distracting, to me.

nevertheless, it is certainly true that a ctp "bad" release is better than the best release of many groups. if you want to see this one, this release is very watchable.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Atleast give some leeway toward the tint to try to fix the angle.

6.5 Vid
8.0 Audio
6 Flix

I mean look at Swank's leg shot......Alien look

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by lo.pro
this is not really a big complaint... this rls was definitely watchable. but what's up with the framerate? i'm surprised it's at NTSC, considering it doesn't really have a flicker to it... but i can't see them doing a PAL>NTSC conversion, when there's no need to...

also, what's up with the field mismatch? if you notice, all the scene changes have mismatched fields, you can see both scenes at once. i almost want to say 'bad ivtc', but i just can't figure out why they'd ivtc a cam, unless it was filmed at NTSC rate to begin with... but if so, i'm very surprised that there's no flicker to speak of...

hrm... well, to my mind, this is one of the lower quality ctp releases i've seen, even from this year. the angle is bad, it makes it look like the AR is way off.. and the weird field matching is distracting, to me.

nevertheless, it is certainly true that a ctp "bad" release is better than the best release of many groups. if you want to see this one, this release is very watchable.

---

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

the picture is superb, but like it has been said, the view is bad. its obvious at times, but if you just looked and glanced at the right time, it isn't noticable.

__________________
going by the jpg, i will take a little dull video over the last release anyday.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

about boom mics..

The problem with boom mics on rips isn't the groups fault its when the film isn't loaded up perfectly on the projector and it shows too much of the top of the film thus letting the boom mic into the shot a little. So the group isn't really to blame.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Good lookin TS, one of the worst movies I've ever seen. My friends thought it was hysterical though. 8/8/1

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged