horizonstar
Dec 2002
$uXor
|
Re: genetics hmmmm maybe
quote:
Originally posted by jason591
but he also has nutritionists chefs dieticians trainers oh yea and of course.......time!! and (maybe) steroids lol
and regards to macs sure they look better but pcs have taken them over in speed and performance and i can only imagine how hard it is to find mp3s on a mac cos theys only about 100 mac users in the world right?
pcs win everythime cos how can you use a computer without a right mouse button or a scroll wheel??? it must be painful!!!
lol
those poor mac users it reminds me of the old betamax user guys telling you how much better betamax was than vhs lol
Wow, so many idiotic points in one post. However do you manage it?
First of all, Arnie doesn't use steroids. If you read any of his biographies, you'll see multiple chapters devoted to his anti-steroid stance.
Second, only a person who knows absolutely nothing about processors, caches, and instruction pipelining would say that PCs are faster than Macs. I've compared my 867MHz G4 chip and a 1.8GHz Intel chip at DVD ripping and encoding to DivX5 AVI, and the Mac blows the PC out of the water cuz of the G4's vector arithmetic hardware. There are tons of sites online where you can go to see similar speed tests.
Third, what does "performace" mean if you've already said the word "speed" in a sentence? Be precise.
Four, what does an operating system have to do with the availability of MP3s? Are you so ignorant that you don't understand the concept of a "computer network"? See, there's this thing called the "In-Ter-Net" that doesn't care about your hardware, software, or operating system. Everything available online is available to any user running a network client that obeys the standards. I download dozens of MP3s a day onto my Mac. On Macs there's even a new program called iCommune that interfaces with the standard MP3 player (iTunes) to make the downloading of MP3s from other Mac users over the "In-Ter-Net" as easy as clicking a link.
Five, in my previous post I pointed out that 5-button mice are easily available on a Mac, but that I rarely find a need for any extra mouse buttons. The scroll wheel is also there, but I don't need that either. In fact, for almost everything I want to do on OS X, I just use the keyboard. I rarely touch the mouse. That was true on my Mac Plus 10 years ago and remains true now.
Six, how limited is your intellect? Just because someone claims that one technology is better than another, it must automatically be the same as another not-at-all-similar debate that took place over a decade ago?
Seven, my Mac never crashes.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
- 
04-21-2003 11:58 PM
hahaha
