quote:

---

Originally posted by morco
P.s. who would want to watch this (no, this is not to make fun of people )

---

I've already seen it and am going to see it again , but not until a better release comes out.

This one isn't much better quality than FTF's, so I'll let it pass as well... 7/4/8

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

audio is blasting, that tinny TOO LOUD sound
video isnt SVCD quality
green line in the jpegs is also in the sample, like their release of the core screener (not a big deal tho)
nice try to bring a better release, TCF!
if you have FTF then dont bother with this one.
6/4/x

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i grabbed the sample and from the juding of it, it sux so much. the pic is better than the ftf release but the sound was so hollow and scrape that i couldn't understand what the seagulf was saying. i suggest u guys/gals just wait for a ctp rls (hey what happen to ctp awesome svcd rls?) or wait for a screener of this movie. my vote. 7/4/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I know this may sound sad but i have seen this movie 4 time...spending a total of $32. I like this movie alot..and i think i will wait for a better copy..i saw sample..pic is about a 6.5 but sound is good about a 7.5 but the movie overall is a 9. And the reason i saw it 4 times is because i went with different people...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Video is significantly better, what most of you fail to realize is that CBR vs. VBR doesn't necessarily mean the picture quality itself would be better (also depends on the source). In most cases that's all up to the encode settings, VBR shines best in motion compensation and distributing video bitrate where it's needed. I downloaded both copies and in FTF's copy every slight movement even a fish tail wiggling had blocks and pixelation around it. Well, to get to my point TCF's video is much better at compensating for motion and you barely see any pixelation even in high motion parts. Colors weren't overly saturated and video was much sharper and surprisingly less flickerish, Audio on the other hand left something to be desired It caused clipping I on loud scenes and it had this wierd echo which was worse than the one in their Matrix rip, it wasn't cammish hollow but definitely echoeish hollow (I dunno if you guys understand what I mean there but easily audible in comparison to real cams). Easily tweakable with a good audio setup but still annoying, if only we could merge TCF video with FTF audio then it'd be kickass TCF ya should left this internal but everyone drops a bombshell every once in a while, yall still kick arse! 9/5/10 Don't get me wrong, I'm a grown man but PIXAR toons kick ass.

Off topic but whoever said TCF was jealous of FTF must be kidding me right? LOL, that's an overstatement! I don't think any VCD groups feel threatened by FTF. Just my 50 cents.

Last edited by on 06-08-2003 at 11:35 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

not much different than the FTF release, quality does not warant usage of svcd, but since its TCF everyone will praise. just another dupe.

---

Last edited by brr8760 on 06-09-2003 at 12:14 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Not what you are used to from TCF, but slightly better than FTF's. But the world could have done without this release.....

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged