VCDQuality Forums - Scary Movie 3 To be given an PG-13 Rating!

VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0

VCDQuality Forums > Off Topic > Movie, movies and more movies! > Scary Movie 3 To be given an PG-13 Rating!

Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Last Thread Next Thread

Author

Thread

napalmfuzz
Feb 2002

bannable

quote:
Originally posted by teen_wasteland
If you watch a softened version of Scary Movie 3, you have no one to blame but the makers of the movie. Shit, the MPAA didn't go to them and say "We want this movie to be PG13 so you better damn well make it that way!" Don't give me this stupid move by the MPAA shit, that makes absolutely no sense.

this is obviously not the case.. but im willing to put money down on the fact that it wasnt the production team that decided to shoot for a PG-13.. it was the damn distributers.. new line or whoever gave the greenlight for this piece of shit.. decided they wanted to cash in a little bit more.. so made it so more people can get into the theatres.. allthough it makes sense for this movie to fucking flop.. who knows..

i mean after i witnessed goddamn jeepers creepers 2 become the number 1 movie in america.... i have no hopes for american movie viewers.. apparently theyre a bunch of easily led douchebags... so who knows..

but yeah.. sequels to parody's dont work.. naked gun.. great.. it sequels.. bleh..

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-02-2003 07:55 PM

Click here to Send napalmfuzz a Private Message

platinum_bomb
Not Yet

Guest

I know that Scary Movie wasn't aimed at kids. Come on. A guy busts his nut so hard in Scary Movie 2, it blows the chick sucking his dick back onto the freakin wall. Yeah, i dare someone to try and get away with aiming that towards 13 yr olds. lol

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-03-2003 12:39 AM

teen_wasteland
Not Yet

Guest

When you say young teenagers, I'm thinking in the age group of 15-19. If that's not what you meant, then fine. But I sure as hell know that most adults aren't as entertained by the nut-busting that you mentioned as teenagers are.

Napalm, I agree. There's no question that the distributers very well could have had influence in pushing a pg-13 movie in order to make more money from a younger crowd. My point was simply that the MPAA only gives a rating, it doesn't influence a movie's content.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-03-2003 01:27 AM

XeroFightsAlone
Dec 2002

Registered

quote:
Originally posted by teen_wasteland
My point was simply that the MPAA only gives a rating, it doesn't influence a movie's content.

that sure didnt happen with american pie, or the south park movie.

__________________
soda box

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-03-2003 08:10 AM

Click here to Send XeroFightsAlone a Private Message

platinum_bomb
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by teen_wasteland
When you say young teenagers, I'm thinking in the age group of 15-19. If that's not what you meant, then fine. But I sure as hell know that most adults aren't as entertained by the nut-busting that you mentioned as teenagers are.

well 15-19yr olds arent young teenagers, they are young adults. I guess i mean like 12- 14 something like that.. the content of these movies would be inappropriate for them. 15-19 sounds much better, but then that averages to about 17 which is the regular R rating, ya know so.. i mean if it has a pg-13 rating they might lose sales if the last 2 movies targeted an older audience. Then again, it might not be that big of an issue.. provided they advertise well, and still include crude sexual humor. Man, in the trailer they make fun of the infamous Pam and Tommy video.. lmfao... fawkin classic

http://www.apple.com/trailers/miramax/scary_movie_3/

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-03-2003 12:17 PM

teen_wasteland
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by XeroFightsAlone
that sure didnt happen with american pie, or the south park movie.

Forgive me for not being familiar with these two examples, but please explain how so? The only thing I see that might've happened was that the MPAA was going to give these movies NC-17 ratings based on the content, and thus the film makers cut out certain parts in order to obtain the R rating.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-03-2003 09:49 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:53 AM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Last Thread Next Thread

Show Printable Version |

Email this Page |

Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >