qubit
May 2003
Girl Geek
|
quote:
Originally posted by jp77
it's not as bad as everyone say's it is .very watchable.and maVen hasn't released or plan on rlsing a copy of this
video..7
audio..7.5
movie...it's a chick flick who cares
Why should maVen, or anyone else for that matter, bother releasing something clearly no one wants to see? Calling it a "chick flick" (in the way most people define the term) might be giving it more credit than it deserves. Can't say, cuz I ain't seen it, but I saw the first one. I think of it as a "manic-christian-aunt-flick," because my manically christian aunt loved the first one, saw it three times in the theater, and this is the woman who used to never see a movie cuz it was a "sin." Her rules have changed, somehow, but her taste has yet to develop. I can say without embarrassment that the first one was cute ... a little too cute, but not horribly bad. I'm stunned they made a sequel, but my aunt is thrilled. And, last, but not least because it is the reason I'm posting this in the first place, calling a film a "chick flick" is sooo lame. It's a cop-out for a person who doesn't want to have to think (that means using the brain) and/or feel (that means using the heart) while watching a movie. Sure, some films are just mushy and yucky, like a Harlequin Romance "novel" (nothing worse), but that doesn't mean women will like it. With that said, I'm sure I've broken all the posting rules since I'm not rating the movie; not going to d/l it either. I hope it didn't "slag" on anyone.
__________________
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
09-07-2004 10:38 AM
