firefighter
Sep 2002
BANNED
|
quote: Originally posted by Bullet
It's a nuke and a waste of bw. POT has the ego of ctp and videocd but the results of fra.
stop rlsing crap pls pot
when i d/l a ts...i know it's just a cam with direct sound. But i always expect and hope the video is also better. Videocd, maven, ctp etc give me that pleasure. Pot just first rls a shitty cam and then arrange dts and rls the same cam with direct sound.
pffffff,....bring me quality pls
4/8/6
LOL
quote: POT has the ego of ctp and videocd but the results of fra.
For starters , if POT had the ego of Ctp/VideoCD this would be SVCD TELESYNC (mpeg2), just like FRA, SG18 etc try and do. POT always does VCD TELESYNC (mpeg1) im pretty sure for two reasons; leave the door open for a better copy ie SVCD TS from Ctp/VideoCD , or their the only silver grp who realises that when they buy the Silvers its already MPEG1 (VCD) and video is pretty screwed by the cammer and by coverting it MPEG2 (SVCD) , it doesnt make that much of a quality difference .... rather screws the next grp from releasing a possible better copy.
quote: It's a nuke and a waste of bw.
Sure , as they said in nfo ... kiddie nukers will nuke for dupe. As far as i seen FRA isnt "recognized" as it was nuked everywhere for "absolute crap quality". The quality of this not only is it 1 CD , but much much better quality. If any were a waste of bw it was the shitty FRA SVCD TS Copy , rather then the good encoded 1 CD POT copy.
quote: Videocd, maven, ctp etc give me that pleasure.
Well , Seeing there is no VideoCD, maVen , Centropy copy out there .... i guess your SOL
As for this copy, much better encoded ... yes its still a bit blurry but its not bright as hell like FRA's. This is MPEG1 (VCD) like it should have been in the first place. Small crop to take those glitches around the screen out , unlike FRA's , this would be the copy to pick up ..
6/8/?
__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|