VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > VCD > Bewitched - TELESYNC -
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Jrobi7114
Jan 2005

Registered

Group ???

N0Gr0up

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-30-2005 07:22 PM
Jrobi7114 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Jrobi7114 Click here to Send Jrobi7114 a Private Message Find more posts by Jrobi7114 Add Jrobi7114 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Mollins
Jun 2005

Registered

hmmm, not the best TS ive seen

Audio - 4 WAY too quiet
Video - 6 too bright, and orange tinted
Movie - 7 tis ok, nothin excellent though

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-01-2005 09:44 PM
Mollins is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Mollins Click here to Send Mollins a Private Message Visit Mollins's homepage! Find more posts by Mollins Add Mollins to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
DocVW
May 2003

Member

After watching full release on big screen:

Video quite bright and visisted the pixel palace quite a few times.

Audio was as mentioned, very tinny-hollow-echoy, quite annoying but you could listen to it.

Rating on full release:

V:6
A:5
M:8 Decent remake with good casting.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-02-2005 03:34 AM
DocVW is offline Click Here to See the Profile for DocVW Click here to Send DocVW a Private Message Find more posts by DocVW Add DocVW to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Fordirelifesake
Jun 2005

BANNED

The sound did seem sort of like a CAM, but it was still very good. Video is really good, a little too bright, and noticeable angle. Best release that I've seen, I suggest picking this up.

8/7/?

__________________
Return to the womb (new life).

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-03-2005 06:20 PM
Fordirelifesake is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Fordirelifesake Click here to Send Fordirelifesake a Private Message Find more posts by Fordirelifesake Add Fordirelifesake to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
acme420
Feb 2003


-¤-wèèdwhø®ê-¤-

from sample.

video very bright colors are oversaturated, its watchable i give it a 7.

audio is hollow, sounds like a cam i havent heard any laughing in the background but still pretty hollow. i give it a 5

movie i havent watched it yet. ill let you know later .

7/6/?

__________________
eat me balls!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-04-2005 01:44 AM
acme420 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for acme420 Click here to Send acme420 a Private Message Find more posts by acme420 Add acme420 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
BLUE-NEO
Jan 2004


In the mind of reality!

This is a good release...colors got back and forth about twice in the film also the contract jumps a few times...overall looks great on t.v. I watched full release....

8/8/7 movie was actually good.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-04-2005 04:10 AM
BLUE-NEO is offline Click Here to See the Profile for BLUE-NEO Click here to Send BLUE-NEO a Private Message Find more posts by BLUE-NEO Add BLUE-NEO to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
verse
Jul 2005

Registered

mpaa..

Is this the repack by oFFEND?
Is this the repack by oFFEND? It sure does look like it. I'v played them both at the same time, one on my standalone, and one on the puter, and they both look like the same video,ie. motion blur, cig burns. And both have the coughing in the same spots. So either this group stole the audio and got an identical video, or this is the oFFEND repack release without the name. Don't know why they wouldn't post here with a name, unless, and no flaming intended at all, since they release on b*tt*****t sites they aren't considered sceneworthy. Don't know but something is definitely amiss here.

I smell MPAA? keke

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-04-2005 12:32 PM
verse is offline Click Here to See the Profile for verse Click here to Send verse a Private Message Find more posts by verse Add verse to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
T2U
May 2005


Member

Very good quality..looks great on tv...sounds not to bad....movie wasnt to bad either....8/7/7.5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-07-2005 03:47 AM
T2U is offline Click Here to See the Profile for T2U Click here to Send T2U a Private Message Find more posts by T2U Add T2U to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
yukichigai
Mar 2005


Video Tech Geek

Meh, okay

Certainly could be worse, but not too horrible.

Video: 6

It's not unwatchable, not by any means, but whoever had the camera didn't know how to prevent it from auto-adjusting contrast between scenes. The best example is the credits right at the beginning; I was only able to read them as they faded out, for a span of about a half-second. It also makes the film seem a little blurrier. The cropping on it is mostly unnoticable, though there's minor screen distortions at the top corners; the camera position must have been towards the front of the theater. Motion blur -- that lovely symptom of recording a 23.976fps film with a 25fps cam -- is a bit worse than most releases due to the contrast issue.

Audio: 5

My rating is based on the assumption that it's a true TS, though the audience sounds seem to indicate that it isn't. There's a constant hum sound throughout parts of the film, particularly towards the end. The sound comes out tinny with very little bass, though this is to be expected from Cam audio. A few times I had trouble understanding the quieter lines, but this was very rare. 95% of the time the audio was perfectly audible and understandable, if tinny.

Movie: 7

I didn't really hate it, but I didn't really like it either. There were a lot of funny bits in the film -- easy to do with Will Ferrel in the flick -- but the plot was really badly executed. The basic premise was pretty good, but there was far too much time spent on little side-jaunts and setting up later events that the really good part of the film was only in the last 20 minutes of it. If there'd been less time concentrating on wacky setups -- oh, and some freakin' explanations of what the hell was going on with Aunt Clara and "rewind" and all that -- and more wacky witchery then I think the film would have turned out much better. It certainly wasn't a performance problem; everyone carried off their roles great. Just in a "this is a badly-written script" way.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 07-09-2005 02:35 PM
yukichigai is offline Click Here to See the Profile for yukichigai Click here to Send yukichigai a Private Message Find more posts by yukichigai Add yukichigai to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.