planetsmasher, you are saying this is better than anything released to date. are you slightly insane? the silvers cam was waaaay better than this copy. the colors on this copy are fucked to high heaven, this is obvious even from the jpeg (and yes i did see the sample) look at that guys face, its bright pink and white and she looks like an albino. its also kinda blurry.

if you actually watched the silvers copy (or the original dvdr of it like i did) you will see that is a million times better than this heap of trash.

5/7/10

/me walks away

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Well, with all the mislabeling lately... can you blame people? Just about every other release is mislabeled. If groups want to play stupid games like that then they deserve to get bad mouthed.

Like I said in a different thread, I'll give props to a group that does a good job. But I'm not about to sit here and say "OMFG, thx for this awesome release. thanks for risking your tails camming!" on an unwatchable release. The scene has to have standards. And if we all give mad props to groups on crap releases then we just lowered the standard. And that's what's wrong with the scene right now- low standards.

Basically what I'm saying is this: if a group mislabels a release, does a horrid job camming, or whatever... I believe they deserve every ounce of criticism.

Anywho, I'll shuddup now. No one cares about my opinion either. :-)

__________________
"Signatures Suck"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by mattmatt02


if you actually watched the silvers copy (or the original dvdr of it like i did) you will see that is a million times better than this heap of trash.

5/7/10

/me walks away

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this is just plain a pathetic rls.. even the sample is unwatchable, video is waaaaaaaaay too bright and the sound is out of sync + it sounds like ass. terrible rls..

3/2/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by pjfan281
i guess you didnt notice the sync issues...esp on cd2 where its off by like 2 seconds at times

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I dont know why people have rated this release as low as they have the video all though bright in light parts of the movie is still far above average. My critical remarks are to the sound. For direct audio ( if it really is) is very poor. In some parts of the movie it sounds almost ambient, in all of the movie louder speech and sound effects sound muffled. Ive heard much better audio from fm sources. Yeah, it sure is late to see a ts of this movie especially because of the great silver that was released but on quality alone I would rate this movie at 7/5/8 (rating as ts, as should be done).A little of topic but still relevant;I was able to take this audio and mux it with the video of the silver release with very little a\v sync problems.I had to slide the audio around a bit but thats all.If you have the time and enjoy that type of thing ide recommend you give it a try. Unlike most of my other redubbing adventures where I had to work out huge gradual a\v synch issues I didnt have that problem with this.

Last edited by zerobyte on 09-07-2005 at 11:47 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

:: *snip* Shut up

6/6/5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Video is bad for 39 min. then the brightness cuts down some and it looks more like a ts and audio is better than cam



6/6/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by mattmatt02
i was only going by the sample, didnt get full rls, i noticed a sync problem but i thought it was my comp going slow. i had nero, tmpgenc and bt all running at once so things do go out of sync under those conditions for me...and i was mainly going off the picture.

but silvers rls was fine, and better than this by far imo, so i cant think why this was even needed. im gonna wait till a dvdrip to replace this kickass movie!

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

why do people babble on about things other than the quality of the movie. i thought this was was ok to watch but as said the picture was very bright if i had got this in the reviews i would not have waisted the bandwidth good try though keep it up ;-)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by pjfan281
i meant sync issues in the silvers rls.

---

Last edited by mattmatt02 on 09-08-2005 at 11:30 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i watched this rls last night. let me say first off this is the same exact video as the silver rls. you can tell when the guy is adjusting his screen for the whole first 3 minutes or more of the movie. colors are a bit off and too bright on lighter skinned people faces, etc. i filtered it a bit and it helped, but not a great deal

audio is good, weird at some points (sort of hollow)

didnt notice any sync issues

7.5/7.5/7.5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Well a great big THANK YOU to this loser group for re-releasing a higher bitrate and resolution (SVCD) encode of the same source as the VCD everyone already had, but somehow managing to make it look worse.

THANK YOU SO MUCH for wasting everyone's time and bandwidth, and for putting in the bare minimum effort to earn some kredz on some dumb topsite that obviously doesn't nuke for shit quality.

1/1/8

__________________
- paf -

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged