bcool2k
Feb 2004
Senior Member
|
quote:
Originally posted by SHaKiNGBRaVe
shame shame shame
you'd think a group would try and pass something like this off for a lesser release, but no, they go and do it for a huge blockbuster. have some pride in your work if nothing else!!!
video : 6, cropped to hell like all the other reencodes (xvid comes to mind). and if you think this is a real tc, i've got a news flash for you.
audio : 6, dunno if it has to be direct for a telecine per scene standards, but throw me a bone. non-direct audio doesn't surprise me considering their video source
movie : 6, didn't impress me (besides the cgi)
sorry for the harsh review, but certain groups that label ts's and audience audio as tc's and direct should just label properly. i'm not knocking the effort and risk they go to to provide these releases, JUST BE HONEST!!!
U want Honest HEar ya GO!!
... Dude the scene has NUKERS to determine source and none of em question the source as TC..Its a Telecine and the crop is minor and the auido has a slight hiss at high volume, but is very direct and has good bass.. Certainly NOT audience audio LOL whatever that means. As for the film, .the movie is just too long.. How bout u let NUKERS do their job and stop wasting ppl time bout what u think this source should be..ITS A TELECINE and a damn fine one !!
7.5 A tad cropped but clean pic
8 Mostly direct audio looses connect right as end credits roll
7 It takes way too long just to get to see King Kong
Last edited by bcool2k on 12-30-2005 at 05:45 AM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
12-30-2005 01:09 AM
