VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > VCD > Minority Report *SVCD* - SCREENER - TCF
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
The Booker Man
Aug 2002

Bet ya cant guess

Yea ok movie sucked badly

7/7/3(sound is better then telicine)

__________________




Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 05:23 AM
The Booker Man is offline Click Here to See the Profile for The Booker Man Click here to Send The Booker Man a Private Message Find more posts by The Booker Man Add The Booker Man to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CharlyTuna
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz


ROFL Charly ur a stupid fuck man or shall I say 27_7 or Gallonfreak just an FTF dicksucker u suck their dicks until u can suck no more. Anything that is good u say sucks quit sucking dick u underaged Kazaa dling fagget!




arnt you gonna relize the westside homboy kid was that gallon guy, can you please wake up


and yes when someone rates somehting, its an opinion on quality, and assholes like you are why threads get huge with nonsense, cause you feel you have to reply to anyone and that dont agree with you, forgive me, but i didnt know the king VCD judge died and appointed you in his place..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 06:33 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
a1catraz
Jun 2002

Registered

quote:
Originally posted by CharlyTuna




4/4/2 most boring movie i ever seen, i think country bears has an edge on it,lol

and like i said 4in vid/4in aud

p.s. this is what i gave tcf on there last release

ok i burned the 1st cd so far and watch 4 minutes of it, its nice

the last reign of fire you couldnt see shit, this one is very watchable

8/8/? havnt seen whole movie, cause last release was unwatchable..

good work tcf

so im very honest when somehtings great and when its not...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Originally posted by CharlyTuna
last release was better.


4/4/2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


and like i said 4in vid/4in aud

p.s. this is what i gave tcf on there last release
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ok i burned the 1st cd so far and watch 4 minutes of it, its nice

the last reign of fire you couldnt see shit, this one is very watchable

8/8/? havnt seen whole movie, cause last release was unwatchable..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

uve posted twice, and we already know ur a fuck head..

Reign Of Fire?? bad quality, who da fuck are u kidding??

MAYBE THE SCENES WERE DARK, but the RiP was PERFECT..

tuna U DEF have to be 24/7 u have like 90 posts in in 2 1/2 weeks..

jezz stop postin..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 07:01 AM
a1catraz is offline Click Here to See the Profile for a1catraz Click here to Send a1catraz a Private Message Find more posts by a1catraz Add a1catraz to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
OzZyOz
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
arnt you gonna relize the westside homboy kid was that gallon guy, can you please wake up


Ok first of all hmm gallonfreak sucked FTF's dick just like u Gallonfreak posted just like u and Westsideboy posted o say a few times and they weren't that stupid. So stfu and quit denying it. I'm not the moron filling up posts with 4/4/2 FTF rules if FTF would release this FTF would rule it. U provide us with useless info Gallonfreak just fricken quit signing up wit diff names. You waste are time just shut the hell up and die! as for this release no offence TCF its kew but not ur best work. As for u Charly Fuckhead u can go ask ur mom why she didn't have a condom handy the night u were made.

Last edited by OzZyOz on 09-21-2002 at 07:39 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 07:11 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
brr8760
Feb 2002


Chief Phil Ossoffer

Except for a couple of you-- Redemption, ebeats-- this is a damn sorry thread. I dumped a better version of this movie (the workprint?) only to get a newer version (TC- with a f**ked framerate), which left me with nothing. Hope this is a step up from the workprint. Can't really tell from these comments so far.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 08:01 AM
brr8760 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for brr8760 Click here to Send brr8760 a Private Message Find more posts by brr8760 Add brr8760 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CharlyTuna
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz


Ok first of all hmm gallonfreak sucked FTF's dick just like u Gallonfreak posted just like u and Westsideboy posted o say a few times and they weren't that stupid. So stfu and quit denying it. I'm not the moron filling up posts with 4/4/2 FTF rules if FTF would release this FTF would rule it. U provide us with useless info Gallonfreak just fricken quit signing up wit diff names. You waste are time just shut the hell up and die! as for this release no offence TCF its kew but not ur best work. As for u Charly Fuckhead u can go ask ur mom why she didn't have a condom handy the night u were made.




you realy need to lay off crack, its bad for you and you lose teeth,

how am i sucking anyones dick?

the highest rating i gave to esoteric, and tcf, to me there one of the best, not every release could be 8's. ozzy is starting to sound like a member, notice he was my best friend when i gave all 8's on last tcf release, and now looks like i struck a nerve. hehe

didnt know i was the only one who liked ftf, try reading ftf's threads, more DICK SUCKERS then me


back off the crack




p.s. also you guys must judge every movie in the same category, when i judge a screener, its for screeners only, when i gave this a 4/4, its judging for screeners, when i gave a ts a 6, thats judging for ts's.

i dont judge every release as same catergory, how can u compare a screener with a ts, makes no sense, there 2 seperate, like oil and vinegar..


so when i judged MINORITY REPORT, this was judging on every screener i ever saw and how i rate screeners only


geeez

Last edited by on 09-21-2002 at 08:24 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 08:14 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
[RaZoR]
Jul 2002


Registered

i just totally agree with OzZyOz . this charleytuna is a dick sucking dumbass . look , he always give 4/4 or something like that
(exept for FTF releases)

havnt watched this , but hope its the first watchable copy of MR.
movie rox . i only watch shockvcd's ts yet

__________________
no idea

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 08:26 AM
[RaZoR] is offline Click Here to See the Profile for [RaZoR] Click here to Send [RaZoR] a Private Message Find more posts by [RaZoR] Add [RaZoR] to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CharlyTuna
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by [RaZoR]
i just totally agree with OzZyOz . this charleytuna is a dick sucking dumbass . look , he always give 4/4 or something like that
(exept for FTF releases)

havnt watched this , but hope its the first watchable copy of MR.
movie rox . i only watch shockvcd's ts yet




ok let me shut you up not once, not twice, but three times!
simply read below on recently releases


"ok i burned the 1st cd so far and watch 4 minutes of it, its nice

the last reign of fire you couldnt see shit, this one is very watchable

8/8/? havnt seen whole movie, cause last release was unwatchable..

good work tcf






7/8/4

great work Eso

im judging by whole release, not jpg or sample.

the only way 2 judge.
keep em coming




7/5/? i saw 1st few minutes, no time to watch, ill watch later


great pre. talk baout kick ass release

esoteric and tcf on top of the game now"


time to shut up now

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 09:24 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Whrswoldo
Not Yet

Guest

CharlyTuna i think you might want to get your eye prescription checked b/c the TCF release of reign of fire you rated a 4/4/2 was a very nice rip at least, CERTAINLY not below average... People like you make things very difficult; when you bash a rip like reign of fire and give this rip (which several others have also thought is bad) the same rating it really shits on your integrity.

I don't care how many people you are or who's dick(s) you suck, but for this forum to be of any help to people you can't give shit ratings without justification. Same for high ratings... if you REALLY like the new dvdrip of land before time IX but the screen is tilted at a 45 degree angle with inverted colors and the audio echos in spanish, don't influence some poor idiot into wasting his time downloading it by giving it a 10/10/10 with a million "!"'s and "***rules!".

If you really think a rip's vid and audio are 4's, you might consider explaining your decision with more than "this movie sucks."
peace out
</rant>

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 09:43 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Whrswoldo
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by CharlyTuna



ok let me shut you up not once, not twice, but three times!
simply read below on recently releases


"ok i burned the 1st cd so far and watch 4 minutes of it, its nice

the last reign of fire you couldnt see shit, this one is very watchable

8/8/? havnt seen whole movie, cause last release was unwatchable..

good work tcf






7/8/4

great work Eso

im judging by whole release, not jpg or sample.

the only way 2 judge.
keep em coming




7/5/? i saw 1st few minutes, no time to watch, ill watch later


great pre. talk baout kick ass release

esoteric and tcf on top of the game now"


time to shut up now


You focking wanker you edited your previous posts. NE1 else notice this?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 09:47 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
WiggoMan
Aug 2002

Registered

7/8/9
good job TCF!
but i think i will wait for the dvdrip!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 11:59 AM
WiggoMan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for WiggoMan Find more posts by WiggoMan Add WiggoMan to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
faheem
Not Yet

Guest

8/8/8

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 01:11 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CharlyTuna
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by Whrswoldo

You focking wanker you edited your previous posts. NE1 else notice this?



geez another new member.
notice after 5 posts he is on my case

just another group member ,or group whore posting browny points for the group


damn smoochers

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 01:33 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
desertboy
Jul 2002

Senior Member

Talking

7/7/7

Like this film TCF do ya, 'cos you don't seem able to stop releasing it, Best of the bunch though, if only the TC didn't have frame rate issues and hollow sound.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 01:39 PM
desertboy is offline Click Here to See the Profile for desertboy Click here to Send desertboy a Private Message Visit desertboy's homepage! Find more posts by desertboy Add desertboy to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
djkoolaide
Not Yet

Guest

this was... ehhh... unneeded, perhaps?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 07:23 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
KevN2002
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by Redemption
Let me get this straight, i dont have this yet, not even a sample, but the workprint was watchable looked like a Cam at times but apart from the glitches the sound was perfect.

The TC was pure shit, horrible framerate, Bad Aspect Ratio, and worse than TS sound, come on guys be honest, the TC only looked good from the jpgs, i want a good version of this, at least VHS quality, is it worth me getting this.



Edit:Just re-read the nfo, i thought TCF knew how to encode, or is that a typo, it says 480x480 25fps, thats a NTSC resolution with a Pal framerate, thats a XSVCD, no problem for my DVD player but some might moan.

Hey Asterisk get a Widescreen TV, when is Fullscreen high quality.



Exactly, there is still not a good release of this movie...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 07:28 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
crapper
Jan 2002

Senior Member

nice release//
look alot like the tc..
quality a bit the same./.
adn well source svhs..
nice one..
to bad the source wasnt a screener dvd
CANT WAIT FOR THAT ONE!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 07:40 PM
crapper is offline Click Here to See the Profile for crapper Click here to Send crapper a Private Message Find more posts by crapper Add crapper to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
goatboy
Not Yet

Guest

shutup u lot
even if its only slightly better quality than the last release, its worth it... plus... releasing has slowed down over the last few days and i ran outa things to download
thanks for keeping the bordom away fellas... keep up the good work

TCF ownz j00 you know it.
/me does a little more sucking to TCf and goes on his way... but really... i love you guys

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-21-2002 08:57 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MrBoogedy
Not Yet

Guest

Great release

I can't believe everyone has a problem with this release. TCF has released this movie 3 times before, and did an excellent job every time, but it went workprint, then telecine, and now a screener. With each release the quality of the movie is getting way better, and I for one welcome each release. It's not like this is the 3rd screener release, that would be dumb.

And anyone who says this is the same quality as the TC obviously just looked at the jpegs, because TC has a fucked up framerate, wicked detail SVCD, but it gets jumpy, and not smooth motion. Anyone who watched the whole release will agree. And this is by far way easier to watch, although I'm not 100% sure it should've been a SVCD instead of VCD, but I personally prefer the SVCD.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-22-2002 12:29 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redemption
Aug 2002

Senior Member

Got bored here and re-read most of the posts, now come on guys, yes this movie could of been better but its not that bad.

The quality is better than all the last releases, if you judge by jpegs then the TC is better, so now you know who the jpeg people are, the picture isn't perfect and probably doesn't justify 3 CD's, but its still good and the sound is as normal for a VHS rip, so where are all these 4 coming from, by doing that people dont value your opinion.

And i think you read Charly's posts a bit wrong, he never gave Reign Of Fire a 4/4/2.

__________________
Don't knock it if its free, if you could do better why are you downloading it

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-22-2002 07:49 AM
Redemption is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redemption Click here to Send Redemption a Private Message Find more posts by Redemption Add Redemption to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:33 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.