VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > VCD > K-19: The Widowmaker *PROPER* *uNSuBBeD* - SCREENER - TCF
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
mew
Oct 2002

Senior Member

Unneeded dupe, got nuked on most sites too. Looks like TCF is doing everything they can to cover up the fact that VideoCD owned them on 3 screeners in a row. BTW this one got watermarks all over it too...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-14-2002 04:18 PM
mew is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mew Click here to Send mew a Private Message Find more posts by mew Add mew to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
nokia
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by mew
Unneeded dupe, got nuked on most sites too. Looks like TCF is doing everything they can to cover up the fact that VideoCD owned them on 3 screeners in a row. BTW this one got watermarks all over it too...
Barely nuked anywhere except VideoCD affils, check again for yourself. VideoCD owned TCF on 1 screener which is K-19, a dvdrip owns a screener anyday so VideoCD got owned on that release. As for Serving Sara, I don't know if TCF had that but it was a weak movie anyways. Yes, TCF said it had watermarks (blurred out) they didn't deny it but it's definitely a seperate source, different colors and quality. If VideoCD's was really a 1st gen tape then it is one of the worse 1st gen tapes I've ever encountered. Mono + worse quality than TCF's

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-14-2002 11:47 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mew
Oct 2002

Senior Member

Nuked on alot of eu non-VideoCD sites, ranked ones. Sound is maybe a bit worse than TCF but picture isnt, and mono sound is acceptable on a VCD, which is probably why the sites nuked TCF for unneeded proper. People cant release 10 screeners just because they are somewhat better than the earlier one when it was good enough for scene standards. And just because VideoCD won Serving Sara you come with some shitass excuse like "weak movie"? Please...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-15-2002 04:13 AM
mew is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mew Click here to Send mew a Private Message Find more posts by mew Add mew to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
nokia
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by mew
Nuked on alot of eu non-VideoCD sites, ranked ones. Sound is maybe a bit worse than TCF but picture isnt, and mono sound is acceptable on a VCD, which is probably why the sites nuked TCF for unneeded proper. People cant release 10 screeners just because they are somewhat better than the earlier one when it was good enough for scene standards. And just because VideoCD won Serving Sara you come with some shitass excuse like "weak movie"? Please...
And your sarcastic great "movie" TCF in the master of diguises comment wasn't the same? you like to contradict yourself. Did VideoCD get owned on that? O wait, it's not available on hotel screener systems yet

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-15-2002 11:23 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mew
Oct 2002

Senior Member

My remark doesnt diss the release, just the movie. And if we'll be ranking releases by the movie's quality like you suggest then serving sara sure owns master of disguise.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-15-2002 02:09 PM
mew is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mew Click here to Send mew a Private Message Find more posts by mew Add mew to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
blacks
Not Yet

Guest

Most (actually all) of my sites nuked the VideoCD release even before TCF propered (packing mpg was the main reason...i dont really know what sites accept VCDs in mpg format)

So when TCF's proper came out, the sites that didnt nuked the VideoCD release before, decided to do so (stereo reason now).

I am not on millions of sites like some u guys, but based on ratio, VideoCD was nuked, not TCF.

On a side note, I feel that VideoCD should have hurried up with the repack(even though i doubt they can repack a stereo release) instead of dragging it along and allowing other groups a chance to proper. Once other groups propered it, there is no use whining about it since it is their fault you didnt do it right the first time and/or could be bothered to rush a repack.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-15-2002 06:27 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mew
Oct 2002

Senior Member

quote:
Originally posted by blacks
Most (actually all) of my sites nuked the VideoCD release even before TCF propered (packing mpg was the main reason...i dont really know what sites accept VCDs in mpg format)

So when TCF's proper came out, the sites that didnt nuked the VideoCD release before, decided to do so (stereo reason now).

I am not on millions of sites like some u guys, but based on ratio, VideoCD was nuked, not TCF.

On a side note, I feel that VideoCD should have hurried up with the repack(even though i doubt they can repack a stereo release) instead of dragging it along and allowing other groups a chance to proper. Once other groups propered it, there is no use whining about it since it is their fault you didnt do it right the first time and/or could be bothered to rush a repack.



Most ranked eu sites nuked TCF and not VideoCD, thats a fact. I dunno about US sites or unranked sites. Unranked sites tends to have less experienced nukers which results in nfonuking, they just read nfo and nuke by what they read without checking anything for themselves.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-16-2002 12:38 AM
mew is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mew Click here to Send mew a Private Message Find more posts by mew Add mew to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
blacks
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by mew


Most ranked eu sites nuked TCF and not VideoCD, thats a fact. I dunno about US sites or unranked sites. Unranked sites tends to have less experienced nukers which results in nfonuking, they just read nfo and nuke by what they read without checking anything for themselves.



Theyare ranked yes. And the ratio i mentioned is all in EU/US/ASIA. (pretty widespread imo...and no, im not talking about 5 - 6 sites.)
I am quite surprised that your sites accept this.
I mean seriously, what ranked site accept mpgs for movie videocds?
It is a scenewide rule. Everyone knows that.
It is like releasing divx in cbr. Sure I can watch the movie, but its still a scene nuke. Even without a proper, it will get nuked to hell.
What kind of sites are yours? Unless you so happen to be on VideoCD affil sites which of cos will not nuke their own affils.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-16-2002 03:55 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mew
Oct 2002

Senior Member

quote:
Originally posted by blacks


Theyare ranked yes. And the ratio i mentioned is all in EU/US/ASIA. (pretty widespread imo...and no, im not talking about 5 - 6 sites.)
I am quite surprised that your sites accept this.
I mean seriously, what ranked site accept mpgs for movie videocds?
It is a scenewide rule. Everyone knows that.
It is like releasing divx in cbr. Sure I can watch the movie, but its still a scene nuke. Even without a proper, it will get nuked to hell.
What kind of sites are yours? Unless you so happen to be on VideoCD affil sites which of cos will not nuke their own affils.



I can mention at least one 3.0 eu site and a few 2.0+ who nuked tcf for dupe. Also I know the videocd was mpg, but you're exaggerating this. There was a fix released that could make it bin/cue in 5 min, just like any crackfix for isos or sync/badframe-fix for divx, and all those are accepted since its easy to use and little work, so why shouldn't this? Comparing it to CBR is just late, CBR cant be fixed and affects quality, this can be easily fixed and doesnt affect quality or viewing at all if you watch on your computer. Its a rule yes, but most siteops got brains to think with themselves so they see that 5 min of patching is better than waste more bandwidth on a useless repack.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-17-2002 04:20 AM
mew is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mew Click here to Send mew a Private Message Find more posts by mew Add mew to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
blacks
Not Yet

Guest

Well, I am not lying and VideoCD was indeed nuked on all of my sites. Maybe my sites were the only ones that nuked that way, I dont know, I am just reporting it.

I would however like to point out that telling people where to find an imaging program in nfofix is hardly a fix imo. A view shared by most nukers on the sites I am on.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-17-2002 09:11 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mew
Oct 2002

Senior Member

quote:
Originally posted by blacks
Well, I am not lying and VideoCD was indeed nuked on all of my sites. Maybe my sites were the only ones that nuked that way, I dont know, I am just reporting it.

I would however like to point out that telling people where to find an imaging program in nfofix is hardly a fix imo. A view shared by most nukers on the sites I am on.



There was an iND fix released by GRiSO that contained vcdimager and a .bat file so all you had to do was to unpack and run the .bat, like most other fixes. And come on, every one can or can easily learn how to use vcdgear if they dont get the fix, it got a very straightforward interface a ten year old could understand.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-18-2002 12:14 PM
mew is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mew Click here to Send mew a Private Message Find more posts by mew Add mew to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
flipp0r
Sep 2002


Professional Cow Tipper

Thumbs up

Video 7
Audio 7
Film Qual 8.5

Not a bad watch at all. It kept me up till 2am. I really wanted the 1.5 megatons to blow.
And you gotta wonder about a boat that leaks from the start of the movie }:-)

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-18-2002 03:03 PM
flipp0r is offline Click Here to See the Profile for flipp0r Click here to Send flipp0r a Private Message Visit flipp0r's homepage! Find more posts by flipp0r Add flipp0r to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
VCDz
Mar 2002

Senior Member

Nice release VideoCD...

Worth the dwonload if you liked U-571. (Well, by now you might want to wait for a SVCD DVDRIP) .

Video: 8.5
Audio: 8
Movie: 6.5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-20-2002 07:36 AM
VCDz is offline Click Here to See the Profile for VCDz Click here to Send VCDz a Private Message Find more posts by VCDz Add VCDz to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
blacks
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by mew


There was an iND fix released by GRiSO that contained vcdimager and a .bat file so all you had to do was to unpack and run the .bat, like most other fixes. And come on, every one can or can easily learn how to use vcdgear if they dont get the fix, it got a very straightforward interface a ten year old could understand.



That is not the point of it all. Do you agree that it is site rules that vcds have to be packed in mpg format?
If you say it is not scene/site rules, I think it is best you learn more about the scene before posting again. I am not trying to be offensive here.

Same theory as uploading the movie in mpg/dat/zip format instead of rars. Or mp3 groups releasing in rar/zip format. Or XXX groups deciding to rar it in 200meg rars. Or if game groups decided to tag their groupname in front of their release names instead of the back.
Do you know how retarded it would be if everyone in the scene chose what format they like to pack into?

Last edited by blacks on 10-20-2002 at 02:34 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-20-2002 02:25 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mew
Oct 2002

Senior Member

quote:
Originally posted by blacks


That is not the point of it all. Do you agree that it is site rules that vcds have to be packed in mpg format?
If you say it is not scene/site rules, I think it is best you learn more about the scene before posting again. I am not trying to be offensive here.

Same theory as uploading the movie in mpg/dat/zip format instead of rars. Or mp3 groups releasing in rar/zip format. Or XXX groups deciding to rar it in 200meg rars. Or if game groups decided to tag their groupname in front of their release names instead of the back.
Do you know how retarded it would be if everyone in the scene chose what format they like to pack into?



Those kind of mistakes you point to are worse and cant be fixed easily, and a more stupid mistake. Forgetting to do bin/cue is a mistake easily made, and easy to fix. Its not like they will continue to release in mpg format, just a one-time misfortune that people should be able to have oversight with.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-22-2002 04:22 PM
mew is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mew Click here to Send mew a Private Message Find more posts by mew Add mew to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
blacks
Not Yet

Guest

Just answer the question, does it break the scene rules?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-23-2002 02:02 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mrnoregard
Aug 2002


MOVIE GOD

Mew........ please STFU............ who are u trying to sell your bullshit to........... if a site nukes a release that is obviously better and is packaged correctly then thats a site we dont want to hear about anyways.............. gimme a fuckin break...............

__________________
If yo daytons got a lil' mo shine than the ones i got, ama get my nine and yo shit is mine.......

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-23-2002 06:27 PM
mrnoregard is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mrnoregard Click here to Send mrnoregard a Private Message Find more posts by mrnoregard Add mrnoregard to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:00 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdquality.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.