Leigh^
Not Yet
Guest
|
quote: Originally posted by Mike[dk]
5/6/9
I'm new in here (Well, have been visiting daily for a long time, but new to posting), so please correct me if I'm wrong here: How do you guys rate? Do you download and rate the first crappy release that gets out, and afterwards you rate compared to that release? That's the only way I can understand how this release is rated so high. I admit this is the best release so far, but the picture and sound is crap if you compare to a dvd rip so how the f*** can it climb to 7.1 for pic and 7.6 for sound? If this rls is worth this high score, the crew in here must make it possible to rate higher than it is now when the screener comes out to be fair ot that release....
Well, that was my first post. Don't take it personal. I just don't get it
It's not on one huge scale. Some people do vote like that, but they shouldn't. Rate on the source, ie: For a telesync, this is probably about a 6.5, and the audio 7.5. So for example, I have two vhs screeners, one s excellent quality, the other is inferior, I'd rate the inferior one say for example, 4 for video, 5 for sound. That doesn't mean a telesync is better than it. It's because we're voting on the quality of the source, and how it's encoded.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|