actually this is very very nice. logistics was good, but this is much much better.

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

next time lads BEFORE you vote
watch the full film ...

cos cd1 is totaly fucked at 30min into the film it breaks up
till the end of cd1

---

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

y should it be a proper? i was under the impression it gets propered if another version is out that is the same (with something wrong i.e mono sound whatever) since log`s was 3 cd`s and the other was vcd there is no reason to proper.

and to everyone who keeps bitching everytime ctp release something, wots ur problem?
before they were very impressive, svcd ts the only group to release them, awesome quality - whats wrong with that?
now we have a few other groups venturing into it, but at the moment theres normally a few problems that need sorting out.untill thats done, and nox/log start releasing ctp quality releases, well, i dont know what to say, is it cos u want divx reencodes of ctp releases, but they dont release them as early as other groups or what?
i mean really think about it, most people prefer quality (i know i do) so u`d get the best version u can befor a dvd release is out.which is ctp. just deal with it.

as for release. best so far. recomended

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Yeah, CTP sure is the best at what they do...

...filming a goddamn angle.

I'll take the logistic any day.

Seriously, though. Color, sharpness, audio is DEAD ON. Why can't they just fix one little thing.

And in response to the literally millions of SVCD TSs released for each individual movie, there's an old saying: "Do it once; do it right." Hopefully groups like VCDCentral, who are already very close, will overcome the other competition, so we won't have to suffer the torture of these angles.

6/9/2

Last edited by temp0 on 06-19-2003 at 07:25 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

7/8/9

Good movie to watch w/ the gf. Although cd1 has some problems, a repack would be nice, but not expected at all, we can live

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

not bad guys...a little dark..but i think its just my computer screen cause ever one i download is mad dark. Great Audio and Video looks good...keep it up. Maybe we could get a bad byz like this...

8-9-6

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

angle? granted i'm only flipping through the sample, but, i see no angle. another fine centropy release for another summer to fill the gap inbetween fall dvd screeners =)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

yeah i dont know about the repack there buddy it definitely didnt mess up on my player, although for like 3 seconds in the middle of cd1 it does go a little dark and the sound goes too, but other than that right up to par with ctp. (after watchin full version)

movie was pretty good, not great, but decent.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by thejackal2000
y should it be a proper? i was under the impression it gets propered if another version is out that is the same (with something wrong i.e mono sound whatever) since log`s was 3 cd`s and the other was vcd there is no reason to proper.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I agree, much better than loGisTics.

8/8

Thanks again CTP..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

very good, just saw it. gj ctp, still, next time lable it right. OBEY!!

9/9/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

good 7/7/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Are you guys kidding me? CTP's last 3 releases have stunk including this release. CD1 looks damn good but when you pop in CD2 it's horrific! Dark, Red, Grainy!!! Sound is always top notch though 5/8/8, Seriously ppl... stop being fanboys and rate properly. I saw the same voting method with CTP's How to lose a guy in 10 days vs. DiAMOND's PROPER. How can a 2-pass 3CD x 74 minute get an extremely higher score than a 5-pass 2CD x 80 minute, it's not only about the bitrate ya know, motion compensation is in the amount of passes.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

damn fine release

8/8/6

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

good enough, 8/7/6. if this was christmastime video would be a 7 but it's summer and releases are shitty so it's an 8. sound coulda been better centropy, but whatever.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

hasnt anybody said anything about the scene where the screen goes green? for about 3 seconds, other than that nice release

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

not quite up to par with recent, but good none the less...

should be labeled internal, imo...def. not proper...

logistics was fine aside from 3 discs...

6/8/7

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kalpz
hasnt anybody said anything about the scene where the screen goes green? for about 3 seconds, other than that nice release

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tweezer


yeah i just watched the whole movie last night, came on here to post about that....For about 5-6 seconds on the first disk the screen just completely morphs to green, cant see a thing....and if i remember correctly audio goes out

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

7/6/6

Saw no green, just an encode breakup that could be the fault of the player. No chunk missing on mine, the opposite - there is (properly) a 10 second overlap from disc 2 disc. Sound was normalized at 20 over normal, prolley in response to the echo whiners. The normalize added distortion, but not too bad.

Camming was above average, but barely. WAY bloom on colors, oversaturated in post/encode, or from cheap cam (I'd guess the cam, because of the moderate parallax from the lens on it = cheap lens).

On a side note, and on the off chance that someone actually reads this far: Dear scene, can we PLEASE get back to 790-810K KB bins? You that push to get that extra 2.3% of bitrate are shutting out a LOT of people that have very fine old SCSI burners that they NEED for other purposes. These folks don't need a NEW burner if we could just get back to 800K KB bins again. In my case, I'd appreciate being able to burn cams(TS, whatever, it's ALL parallax city) to a CD-RW. There is no possible way I'd watch one of these twice, and why waste the plastic/create the garbage for a lousy 2.3%. Didn't intend a rant or a whine but...

anyway, decent rls - go state...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged