Jesus, allot of you bitch ! ! !
ctp rules
Great Work!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

bottom line is that the svcds are definitely superior to the vcds. but 3 cds for a ts can be excessive. for a major release such as spiderman, i am sure that most people wouldn't mind burning an extra cd. if the release can fit on 2 cds, then i'm all for the svcd. but for any old movie, i would prefer not to use 2 gigs of hd space.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by hpv


Actually I could care less about whether it's VCD or SVCD. But your zenith dvd player is a piece of shit if it can't play the Spiderman SVCD. And as you've already made abundantly clear, you have no where near the required knowledge to make a statement on quality. And btw, I never said anything about an SVCD making a TS better than an VCD. You're the moron who implied that.

---

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by napalmfuzz

just give up man.. give up... ill sum up my argument in 2 words
Junior Member
maybe you werent ready to be winged from kazaa yet

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

oh i see.. we're basing knowledge on post count?... cuz i always thought the guy w/ all the posts.. was the guy w/ too much time on his hands.. and nothing else.

as for this svcd argument.. i think it should be worked out like this:
SVCD TELESYNCS should be standard.. as long as it doesnt take 3 CDs[or 113+ minutes].. if so u go w/ VCD and leave it at 2 CDs.. cuz i dont care enough to burn 3 cds.. of some TS thta WILL have a screener later on.

3cd rls's and up... should only be allowed w/ digital sources..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

There is NO reason why these movies are released as a SVCD...there origin is from a vcd so stretching it out to 480x480 really makes no sense, look at spiderman there faces looked fat and dunst legs looked real fat in that waitress dress....waste of time having to dload another cd, and dont give me crap about encoding ive been ripping shit when most of u were still in diapers...which isnt more than 10 yrs ago

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Im fucking sick of reading this god damn forum. All I hear is bitching and fucking VCD is better than SVCD. Jesus A Christ. No should care so fucking much over something so gay.

If your going to post something, make it a review. And whoever is moderating this forum should post a rule about no gay buttsex flamming about video format. No one wants to read it. Whenever a movie comes out. Someone has to make the same stupid arguement about VCD or SVCD. God im sick of this n00b shit.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

way to be stupid.

quote:

---

originally posted by Bud-Man
there origin is from a vcd so stretching it out to 480x480 really makes no sense

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bud-man
There is NO reason why these movies are released as a SVCD...there origin is from a vcd so stretching it out to 480x480 really makes no sense, look at spiderman there faces looked fat and dunst legs looked real fat in that waitress dress....waste of time having to dload another cd, and dont give me crap about encoding ive been ripping shit when most of u were still in diapers...which isnt more than 10 yrs ago

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Long time reader, first time poster.

Guys sitting here and talking about someones sexuality is not posting a review about the movie. Take a look at the forums of isonews and see what happens when thats how people talk. Lets sit here and talk about the movie (of which there is probably 5 reviews out of 50 posts). Thanks for your time

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Trickster.. i agree.. the movie should be talked about..

but .. u DO realize u did the same thign?.. u didnt mention the movie quality either.. that and.. i dont think there is gonna be much more discussion involved w/ these svcd ts's.. since they will most likely always be of an acceptable quality to those who swing the way of the ts :P

and.. please dont compare this to iSONEWS.. the quality of flame here.. is much higher heh.. but yea.. im done.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

What is the deal with the mikes in this? Where did they get this copy from? I saw it in the theater an i'm sure i would have seen the mike one of the 12 times that are in this release.

No bitching i think it's funny like that.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Has anyone else noticed that this film is unedited(noted because the mic booms are still in the movie)...meaning the CTP is getting it directly from source...Interesting

Good job CTP!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I don't understand why all the complaints. Since Centropy has
been releasing the TS in this format the quality is much better.
I really appreciate the difference in quality. I don't care about
the extra cd(cost about 10cents a disc). Now I can enjoy the
movie at home. I think this format makes them very watchable.
I hate that FTF shit! When I see that group associated with a
release I don't even bother to download it. Waste of time and
a disc. I'm off to the theater to watch "Enough" because I've
had enough of FTF's Shit!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

booms and their mic's

I just wanted to mention something about the microphones in the movies.

A couple years ago I was able to enjoy the only NC-17 version of Jerry Maguire...the reason was because the projector that was used to view it was old school and the filters(to crop the picture, can't remember the actual term) had to be set manually. The projectionist failed to put the proper filter on, so instead of having Cuba Gooding Jr.'s penis cropped out of a shot in the lockerroom, it was there in plain view. The same goes for microphones...

For some reason CTP does not have access to a properly cropped projector, or something to that effect...I have no idea.

So, the copy of Unfaithful they had was most likely no different than the one's released to theater after theater, other than the projector wasn't setup properly.

I am surprised this information isn't more commonly known. The film reel shows more than is actually presented on the screen...I believe pretty much any movie has the boom and all visible, just that they are cropped out by the projector.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

yep.. id bet ur on the mark for sure luckifer

but some movies dont work that way.. this one however probably does.. years ago i used to run projectors for a local theatre [99cent.. theatre w00t].. and they had some of the same problems.. but i have never gone to a real theatre and seen this.. so im wonderin how they managed to find such a poorly setup reel :P..

funny storry about Jerry Maguire by the way

oh and greeneyes.. not to flame.. but u DID manage to contradict urself :P

quote:

---

Orginally posted by Greeneyes:

I don't care about
the extra cd(cost about 10cents a disc)........
I hate that FTF shit! .....Waste of time and
a disc.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

[edit] NO REQUESTING[/edit] -cx

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Your comming on the forum and asking for a movie !
WHY ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Boom Mic

I watched the centropy released of Unfaithful and I enjoyed the movie but the one thing that just racked my nerves what the boom mic showing in like 90% of the movie...... is this a workprint release or something? If this is a telesync shot from a theatre I can pretty much bet people were exceptionally ticked off if they noticed it.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged