VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > VCD > Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones *RECODE* *iNTERNAL* - TELESYNC - XPD
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
gnosis
Not Yet

Guest

dont worry about GOP settings.
as for the color go to simple or custom color correction in the advanced settings

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 04:55 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Jeff
Not Yet

Guest

hahhahah

quote:
Originally posted by gnosis
i knew it!!!!!

i hope they release this internal!
i have been waiting for this one!!

looks nice xpd



HAHAHAH why do u hope they release it internal? so its twice as hard to find?
lmao n00b

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 05:17 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bithevn
Jan 2002

Registered

PAL?!

Is this version also in PAL?

I'm really starting to hate CTP. If it's a re-code of the CTP rls, I hope it isn't. Sure, they're good ... but why the f*** are they releasing all this shit in PAL? My DVD player (Pioneer DV-440) won't even play it!

Okay, I know this shouldn't be the place to rag on CTP.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 05:29 AM
bithevn is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bithevn Click here to Send bithevn a Private Message Find more posts by bithevn Add bithevn to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dystopian
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by napalmfuzz

obviously you know nothing about encoding... you can very easily take an svcd and make a vcd thats better quality simply by taking out the camera glare thats in all of ctp's releases... svcd does no justice what so ever to telesyncs. if youll look at resident evil and then look at spiderman youll notice its a big fucking waste.

EXACTLY. everyone points at the fact that ctp releases the best TS's, as a rule, and uses that as justification for this SVCD nonsense. But they are forgetting that CTP already was releasing the best TS's, as a rule, when they were releasing in VCD. It's just that, because that is true, they get away with pushing this ridiculous idea that SVCD will make a lower quality source, like TS, better somehow.

The Resident Evil is a good example of a VCD that looked at least as good as these recent SVCD's, and that proves that it's the source & the encode, not the format, that makes the difference with TS's.

In fact, I have seen VCD's that were much better than these SVCD's (vcd's that were capped from TV broadcasts, for instance); which again shows, if the release can not even use the full potential of VCD, why are they bothering with the added potential of SVCD?

Now, I'm not putting CTP down for releasing these movies... they are a quality group, and I'm glad to have their releases. Nevertheless, I do not agree with this decision to create this new catagory of release. It is needlessly inconsiderate of those with bandwidth or volume d/l restrictions, causes more congestion / strain on sites & the entire scene infrastructure, and forces lower retention on sites, pushing older releases off more quickly... all for something that serves no good purpose whatsoever.

IMO, there is potential benefit from using SVCD on SVHS, Digital Television Broadcasts, and DVD ripping. There is NO benefit to using SVCD for VHS, TS, CAM, or analog broadcast television captures.

When you rave about how good their latest SVCD release of (whatever) is, try to gather up enough short-term memory to recall that you were doing the exact same thing when they were releasing VCD TS's, which were better than anyone else's. Do you think that if FTF could simply encode their releases as SVCD, and have them be great TS's, they wouldn't be doing it?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 05:44 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
gnosis
Not Yet

Guest

jeff shut your pie hole you fucking gay smut leecher ill kill you right where you stand, who the fuck are you calling "n00b" you bitch you got 10 posts eat some fucking goat shit and enjoy some left overs

dont be classifying whos new and whos not, i beleive eveyrone has thje right to freedom of speech, maybe not where you are from you damn paki, so stfu befoer you classify anyone


you obviously have no clue what i am talking about, what i mean if you understand english text is that i hope they release this internal, which i was referencing the god damn title dumbass
you thinking you all hardcore hahah

Last edited by on 05-28-2002 at 07:04 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 06:56 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
PenisXX
Not Yet

Guest

if you guys think you can improve glare or blockiness with a reencode, you're pretty stupid. you can change colours a bit, but the rest can be adjusted on your TV as well. And a reencode is always worse than original.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 10:26 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
gnosis
Not Yet

Guest

we dont think we can improve the glare and blockiness with rencode, we just want 3 cds instead of 3 with the same quality of the svcd......
people generally like to customize things themeselves.

so i dont think anyone is stupid, i dont know why i btoher anymore...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 03:29 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
reallyill
Not Yet

Guest

trying to convert

Ok, if anyone could help me out here, I'd really appreciate it. I've reencoded numerous vcd's in tmpgenc before, but I can't even get it to open the mpg files of centropy's release. It always tells me it cannot open or is unsupported. I've tried numerous ways of extracting them from the bin, but none of them seems to create an mpg that tmpgenc will open. If anyone has some insight into this, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 06:54 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Diezel
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by gnosis
we dont think we can improve the glare and blockiness with rencode, we just want 3 cds instead of 3 with the same quality of the svcd......

3 cds instead of 3

lol

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 09:43 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
theBlaze74
Not Yet

Guest

buy an Apex please

All of you, please go to K-mart and buy a $50 apex, and then delete this whole thread.

The reason why a reader of this forum would buy a DVD player that does not play an SVCD is amazing.

And as far as re-encoding an SVCD in to a VCD to get "better quality" that is simply funny. Ok, fine, you adjusted the contrast. Wow, that's Great!

If you do it for yourself terriffic, but someone re-encoded the first cd of the ctp release, and uploaded it to the ng BEFORE THE ORIGINAL CTP POST WAS EVEN FINISHED!!

The reason for a multi day post, is to cut the bandwidth so that everyone can get it.

That is why this release is internal.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 10:46 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Hipnotik
May 2002

Registered

i'm with dystopian, i think it's rediculous that CTP can release fuzzy color fucked movies and call them SVCD's. when i think of SVCD i think of dvd quality, not sync problems or blockiness or anything that comes hand in hand with regular VCD's.
just because they release some highly anticipated titles in top VCD format, they think they are preserving something by encoding in SVCD?

maybe i'm just confused but i don't think that CTP should even be in the same catagory as SVCDs.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2002 11:40 PM
Hipnotik is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Hipnotik Click here to Send Hipnotik a Private Message Find more posts by Hipnotik Add Hipnotik to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
gnosis
Not Yet

Guest

i mean 2 jackass

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2002 04:24 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
nddf
Not Yet

Guest

SVCD is a format not a quality type you jackass. Fucking ignorant newbs will whine about anything. For fucks sake watch the goddamned FTF if nothing centropy ever does is good enough. Good luck finding a group that does perfect in theater releases every release.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2002 05:24 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dystopian
Not Yet

Guest

Re: buy an Apex please

quote:
Originally posted by theBlaze74
If you do it for yourself terriffic, but someone re-encoded the first cd of the ctp release, and uploaded it to the ng BEFORE THE ORIGINAL CTP POST WAS EVEN FINISHED!!

The reason for a multi day post, is to cut the bandwidth so that everyone can get it.

That is why this release is internal.

LOL

yeah, it must really piss off all of those CTP members who are uploading their releases to Usenet when that happens

nddf, as i said, i respect CTP and think that they do phenomenal work... the quality & reliability of their TS releases is second to none.

but that doesn't mean that i have to agree with them on this particular issue. i simply do not think that even the best possible TS warrants the use of the SVCD format, and especially not a 3-cd SVCD.

again, VCD's taken from better source material can look better than the best SVCD TS that CTP has ever done. that fact alone is proof enough, to me, that there is no need for them to encode these as SVCD.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2002 03:22 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
nddf
Not Yet

Guest

As ctp states from their nfo, the Telesyncs come from a DV source. Very high resolution, very big size. They are encoding into svcd to keep more of the resolution so that you get a better picture. Encoding a TS into svcd does not a screener make. I think all you nay-sayers are missing the point entirely. Also groups that steal other group's releases and encode them into a different format are fucking lame and have no place anywhere.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2002 08:28 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
themikej
Not Yet

Guest

It cracks me up that you *(gnosis) or anyone else would be angry about anything here. This bootleg sub culture thing is pathetic. Its a fucking movie assholes. A movie that you downloaded free, and cost you nothing but bandwidth. The only part you had in this, was a download. Don't take so much credit for your so called contribution. I don't brag about buying Nacho Doritos when I got to Safeway. Isn't this forum for reviewing bootlegs? It doesn't take more then an idiot to download a movie, but it takes less of an idiot to get worked up over nothing. Don't take is so seriously, nobody cares about you, or your so called leech happy unoriginal sub culture.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-30-2002 01:13 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Faceman
Not Yet

Guest

i don't care about the bickering, i just like to read it (no comments from me on it).

about the SVCD to VCD re-encodes....in some cases it can improve the source in colour and aspect ratio, but quality..not so much. it can keep the same or even make it worse. if people want this for their own reasons, good for them. no reason to disown it. seems to be enough demand for it. who knows, could be CTP doing it under a different name.

i hear their source is DV, that kinda sucks for them for the reason DV to SVCD is tricky. it's not easy to get the quality you normally can from MPG2 to SVCD or video cap to SVCD.

they release great stuff in great time.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-30-2002 05:42 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Metallifux
Not Yet

Guest

quote:
Originally posted by nddf
Encoding a TS into svcd does not a screener make.


Hehe well said Yoda

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-30-2002 08:31 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bbrain
Not Yet

Guest

:(

i am just sad because i can not find this.. anywhere .. also my dvd player plays svcds.. i just want another version also my cousins dvd player will not play them

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-01-2002 06:36 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Odaiba2
Not Yet

Guest

Viewing from different players

Its funny but WINDVD does a very good job in showing most vcd or svcds. In case of StarwarsII and *BRIGHT* recorded pictures, WINDVD is the *BEST*. However, DivX players work just as well and you can adjust the contrast and brightness. I dont understand but Windvd locks thoses controls so you can only watch is *AS IS*.

I think WINDVD for this version is the *BEST* to watch it.

-Odaiba

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-01-2002 01:36 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.