The quality of this is really bad, even for a cam. I mean I get that it's free and all but if you're going to release something then at least try to do it right.
Video=shit
Audio=shit
Movie=Couldn't watch it, quality too poor
I would say that I appreciate the effort but I don't.
Why do people thank everybody for these releases when they are so God damn bad,why release this crap at all,a big chunk of the film is missing,its so dark i thought i had gone blind,sorry but rubbish.
based on sample (cos dont wanna watch a whole cam)
v-4
a-4
m-? yet to watch (could barely see anything on the sample)
typical cam .... will wait for decent ts / tc.....
why does everyone hate it when someone says something good about maven. truth be told they are the only group that consistantly put out quality releases. i for one applaud their efforts and wonder how they get such good looking releases they use a cam dont they?? so maven shake them haters off!! and keep doing the damn thang
The camera man had a difficult time with this one, several times he covered up the recorder with his jacket, even so he still got what he came for.. Security must have been swarming...
Video 5 (cam)
sound 6
Movie 8
Check usernet there should be a xvid available after midnight (est) which will be same source but has been lightened a bit and sound is improved..
I don't know what the F*** you people want now days, a friggin' post production DVD??? Think about it! it's a cam! Besides, dump it into vdub & Audition, & in 45 min you got a decent film, for a early cam.
I thought vid=5
sound=4
Movie=10
Oh, have to kind of agree with isinginthebanned, who said "I remember when it was Centropy makin everyone's pants tight."
Maven need to release their info: on how to encode quality films to using certain hardware(s).... to their closest scenes. Why? So all of us can benefit and ofcourse safety issue for long term
btw man-boob with maven droopy letters across chest acceptable?
07-10-2006 01:59 AM
maven rocks!!!
props 4 the quick rls but....
pirates
