VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DIVX > Miami Vice *XViD* - TELESYNC - PUKKA
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
nwoidaho
May 2005

Member

quote:
Originally posted by nwoidaho
Actually if PUKKA records the CAM source in PAL, the movie would be shorter in time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time. NTSC has more frames per second so by nature would be a longer TRT because of the frame count.

More than likely during this PAL release, over the time of the movie, you could loose 10-13 minutes in NTSC realtime.
Without the credits, maybe 6-8 minutes, loosing 20 minutes of time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time is possible.



Actually I've worked in TV for nearly 10 years and like it or not, a PAL release (IN REAL TIME) will technially be shorter in standard time than an NTSC release.

25fps is not real time, 30fps aka NTSC is in REAL TIME. Since 25fps in PAL equals a second and 30 fps in NTSC (REAL TIME) by capture process you will loose 5 frames per second, over the strech of a minute, you will loose 300 frames per minute (or 9 seconds in real time) using the PAL Standard. Over the time period of an hour, you will lose roughly 9 minutes of time.

There is no missing scenes in this movie. The shortened TRT Time is explained by the usage of the capture format being in PAL compaired to a TRT time from an NTSC reel.

The Pukka release of "Lady in The Water" was internal, that is why it is not indexed on this tracker.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-11-2006 02:00 AM
nwoidaho is offline Click Here to See the Profile for nwoidaho Click here to Send nwoidaho a Private Message Visit nwoidaho's homepage! Find more posts by nwoidaho Add nwoidaho to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
frak
May 2002

Senior Member

watched this verison on the TV last night (liking the xvid/divx dvd player)

quality is pretty good, especially considering it's a relatively dark movie to start. Color is good as is the sharpness. The audio is good as well, didn't sound hollow on the 5.1, no hissing and the dialog was clear

movie was decent.. didn't really have a desire to see this film, but being bored can change things. Colin doesn't really work as sonny crocket, but jamie foxx does a good job as tubbs.

v: 8
a:8
m: 7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-11-2006 10:09 AM
frak is offline Click Here to See the Profile for frak Click here to Send frak a Private Message Find more posts by frak Add frak to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
The Leather G
May 2006

Member

Best Release,,bad flick,,,,,,,for those of us old enough,, and there not many here on this forum,,,,,who remember sitting at home, watching Miami Vice, before heading out to the clubs, this falls way short.
Don Johnson made straight white men stop wearing socks and started them pushing up their peach, white, yellow, mint, lavender, colored jackets. Don Johnson made Ray Bans the THING way before Tom Cruise danced in his underwear.

First: Jamie Fox's original character, RICARDO Tubbs, was Puerto Rican. Fox obviously can't do a PR accent.

Second: PLEASE, a perixoded Colin Farrell looking like he doesn't know what shampoo is for..muchless soap. And the mustache.

Third, Miami: so dark and dank, it could have been filmed in New York City in the Bowery.
Only thing swank about this remake was the car and boats.......where Colin Farrell's greasy, bleached out hair hardly moves.

V=8
A=8
M=4

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-11-2006 04:40 PM
The Leather G is offline Click Here to See the Profile for The Leather G Click here to Send The Leather G a Private Message Find more posts by The Leather G Add The Leather G to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Mr Anarchy
May 2006

Junior Member

quote:
Originally posted by coriy
mono right goldwave sorry i just havnt been able to figure this out could you please be more descriptive


Open the file up in goldwave,
Select effect (across the top),then select stereo,channel mix,
Select mono right or left.
press ok....(wait while it changes audio)
then save as a wav file
then mix it with your video using etc tmpgenc express.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-11-2006 06:32 PM
Mr Anarchy is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Mr Anarchy Click here to Send Mr Anarchy a Private Message Find more posts by Mr Anarchy Add Mr Anarchy to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
chateau
Jul 2005

Member

quote:
Originally posted by nwoidaho
Actually I've worked in TV for nearly 10 years and like it or not, a PAL release (IN REAL TIME) will technially be shorter in standard time than an NTSC release.

25fps is not real time, 30fps aka NTSC is in REAL TIME.

The Pukka release of "Lady in The Water" was internal, that is why it is not indexed on this tracker.




Must have been a pretty crappy TV station you were working at. But hey, maybe you were actually in advertising.
NTSC is no more real time than PAL. If you capture something at 25fps and play it back at 25fps, it's real time. This movie was captured by a guy sitting in a theatre at 25ps and it's getting played back at 25fps.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-14-2006 03:38 AM
chateau is offline Click Here to See the Profile for chateau Click here to Send chateau a Private Message Find more posts by chateau Add chateau to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
wayne89
Mar 2006

Junior Member

i thought this release was shit

V4
A5
M8

__________________
LoL

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-15-2006 01:47 AM
wayne89 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for wayne89 Click here to Send wayne89 a Private Message Find more posts by wayne89 Add wayne89 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Squidman
Jun 2006

Member

V 8
A 7
M 8


Thanks to PUKKA thanks for making a release that could be watched. Yes us ole geezers remember the days of Don Johnson and if the 2 trailers didn't clue you into what kind of movie this was then shame to you.

It was worth the ten-cents I spent converting this to a dvdr, to watch on my 27" old tv. Was it short? maybe because there is 2 scenes missing from the copy. Go see it in the theatre and you will know which scenes, but 2 hours is more attention than most teens can handle.

To the other members : Thanks for pointing out that Jamie fox isn't puerto-rican, that was almost as obvious as Colin having bleached hair and no five o clock shadow. /Me shakes his head and wonders..

Carlos Mencia say: dee dee dee.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-19-2006 06:00 AM
Squidman is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Squidman Click here to Send Squidman a Private Message Find more posts by Squidman Add Squidman to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
porntogo
May 2006

Junior Member

There is no way you would lose 15-20 mins over the course of a movie just cause the fps are different. If you want proof check every ntsc/pal retail release where one or the other(ntsc I think) is nearly always a minute or so longer over 2 hours but thats it.

And just to highlight how daft this point is, ive seen the movie in the cinema and this version is missing at least 3 scenes. A whole dance sequence before the sex scene, a sequence before the caravan explosion and a scene in the boss' mansion.

Thats why the running time is missing minutes.

7/7/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-31-2006 02:59 AM
porntogo is offline Click Here to See the Profile for porntogo Click here to Send porntogo a Private Message Find more posts by porntogo Add porntogo to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdquality.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.