VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DIVX > Shrek the Third - TELESYNC - maVen
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
alkamist
Dec 2006


Member

v:7.5 ( alittle dark in areas)
A:7.5 ( didnt like the cam audio at the end, someones laughing)
V:8 funny, but stupied

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2007 10:21 PM
alkamist is offline Click Here to See the Profile for alkamist Click here to Send alkamist a Private Message Find more posts by alkamist Add alkamist to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
six six six
Jul 2006


Who?

Does anyone else sense something a little fishy about this release? The email address is not the same as the one in previous releases, and the note seems a little... umm... well you know... I have a feeling this isn't really maVen. Same as I did with those VideoCD releases awhile back.

Good release anyway

v8
a7.5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2007 11:08 PM
six six six is offline Click Here to See the Profile for six six six Click here to Send six six six a Private Message Find more posts by six six six Add six six six to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
BIOHazard87
Aug 2006

Senior Member

After figuring out how to do the audio fix....


V: 9
A: 4 (with no fix)
A: 10 ( with fix) - MUCH MORE BASS, and both left and right channels are even now, its great except some reason it doubled the final file size from 700 to 1400..... and I dont know why
M: N/A

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-28-2007 11:57 PM
BIOHazard87 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for BIOHazard87 Click here to Send BIOHazard87 a Private Message Find more posts by BIOHazard87 Add BIOHazard87 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
six six six
Jul 2006


Who?

quote:
Originally posted by BIOHazard87
except some reason it doubled the final file size from 700 to 1400..... and I dont know why



Because you're using a wave file not an mp3 file

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 12:01 AM
six six six is offline Click Here to See the Profile for six six six Click here to Send six six six a Private Message Find more posts by six six six Add six six six to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
betelgeus
Sep 2005

Member

8/8/?

so what exactly has been duped?just the final audio,because it blantaly clear by opening titles this isnt cameras russian version.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 04:00 AM
betelgeus is offline Click Here to See the Profile for betelgeus Click here to Send betelgeus a Private Message Find more posts by betelgeus Add betelgeus to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
okstcowboys1
May 2007

Registered

Help...

::ModEdit: Post your request in the Encoding Help forum :: ~L

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 04:08 AM
okstcowboys1 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for okstcowboys1 Click here to Send okstcowboys1 a Private Message Find more posts by okstcowboys1 Add okstcowboys1 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
pjfan0281
Oct 2005

Member

quote:
Originally posted by GRiMREEFA-2k
Just noticed another watermark at 00:14:46 as Prince charming is talking to barmaid. theres probably more.


actually at 14:59. not sure why this was nuked to begin with. if anything call it mislabeled ts with the very little cam audio at end. but the audio, even the cam, is a different source, so not a dupe. watermark at end is insignificant, and even in the movie it is no more than 2 frames long

Last edited by pjfan0281 on 05-29-2007 at 07:07 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 07:03 AM
pjfan0281 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for pjfan0281 Click here to Send pjfan0281 a Private Message Find more posts by pjfan0281 Add pjfan0281 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
nitemare
Jun 2002

Senior Member

Video - 8
Audio - 5
Audio with Fix - 7
Movie - 7

Fix worked great. Definately needed. Without fix - it is barely watcheable. Thanks for the fix instructions. File size was 1.4GB in size. But, who cares when watching on xbox with a 250gb HD.
Movie was good overall. Better than reviews. Not as good as 1 or 2, but def funny parts.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 07:15 AM
nitemare is offline Click Here to See the Profile for nitemare Click here to Send nitemare a Private Message Find more posts by nitemare Add nitemare to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AssKing
Jul 2005


Registered

Looks better on my 20" television than on my 19" widescreen HD computer monitor.

9/10/7

Video is excellent, rarely have I seen better cam video.

Sound is phenomenal, no hissing, static or anything else. The cam audio with laughter at the end is way at the end of the movie and not worth bitching about. After all, who the hell is going to save this release forever even after the DVD rips are out?

I hope maVen sticks around.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 08:50 AM
AssKing is offline Click Here to See the Profile for AssKing Click here to Send AssKing a Private Message Find more posts by AssKing Add AssKing to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
OSH
Sep 2006


WHO IS JOHN GALT?
*Smashes seal skull*

Great work, pretty dark. Major improvement over the last.

V-8
A-?
M-?

__________________


I'm gay. <3 <3 <3

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 09:59 AM
OSH is offline Click Here to See the Profile for OSH Click here to Send OSH a Private Message Find more posts by OSH Add OSH to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
pjfan0281
Oct 2005

Member

just noticed, this release is missing at least one scene. when arthur is talking to merlin. right when he starts crying the scene cuts out and is missing about 38 seconds (54:28). pretty obvious

Last edited by pjfan0281 on 05-29-2007 at 06:56 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 06:32 PM
pjfan0281 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for pjfan0281 Click here to Send pjfan0281 a Private Message Find more posts by pjfan0281 Add pjfan0281 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
crashiz
Feb 2006


Registered

V-9
A-8
M-7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-29-2007 08:23 PM
crashiz is offline Click Here to See the Profile for crashiz Click here to Send crashiz a Private Message Find more posts by crashiz Add crashiz to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dragon26
May 2006

Registered

also missing 43 secounds from 54:24

but still damne fine release

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-30-2007 02:00 PM
dragon26 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dragon26 Click here to Send dragon26 a Private Message Find more posts by dragon26 Add dragon26 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
pjfan0281
Oct 2005

Member

quote:
Originally posted by dragon26
also missing 43 secounds from 54:24

but still damne fine release



?? its 54:28 and i already posted that =P and really its right around 38 seconds. i compared it to the other release

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-30-2007 05:59 PM
pjfan0281 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for pjfan0281 Click here to Send pjfan0281 a Private Message Find more posts by pjfan0281 Add pjfan0281 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
inplainsight
Apr 2007


VCDQ Updater

quote:
Originally posted by pjfan0281
actually at 14:59. not sure why this was nuked to begin with. if anything call it mislabeled ts with the very little cam audio at end. but the audio, even the cam, is a different source, so not a dupe. watermark at end is insignificant, and even in the movie it is no more than 2 frames long


Just because its a different source doesnt mean no one already did it. As it says on the FAQ here, if it already exists there is no need for it again. And if a group thinks its better than the others it needs a proper tag otherwise its bad... Also there are watermarks throughout this release, which gets annoying to say the least.

Lastly, i don't see what the big fuss is on this, the dark scenes are still horridly dark and you cant see anything. If it was any other group they would be getting bashed over this release.

V:6
A:6
M:still waiting for a better version

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-30-2007 10:26 PM
inplainsight is offline Click Here to See the Profile for inplainsight Click here to Send inplainsight a Private Message Visit inplainsight's homepage! Find more posts by inplainsight Add inplainsight to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
matey9
May 2007

Registered

Video - 8
audio - 7(excluding the cam audio at the end)
Movie - 8 okay movie

Heres a snapshot of the watermark
http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/...11413641qx8.png

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-31-2007 05:01 AM
matey9 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for matey9 Click here to Send matey9 a Private Message Find more posts by matey9 Add matey9 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
pjfan0281
Oct 2005

Member

quote:
Originally posted by inplainsight
Just because its a different source doesnt mean no one already did it. As it says on the FAQ here, if it already exists there is no need for it again. And if a group thinks its better than the others it needs a proper tag otherwise its bad... Also there are watermarks throughout this release, which gets annoying to say the least.




this is often the case when no-name groups release. the group "propering" sometimes doesn't label it as such b/c no one really acknowledges the other group to begin with. such is the case here. it was called "dupe: CAMERA" and nuked, which his wrong since CAMERA release was already nuked for out of sync. only other XVID TS release was by HortonQuality. when you see that you say "who" and when you watch it you say "wtf?"

so yeah maybe it technically should have read "proper" or "really really real proper". anyway, the rls is nice, and the watermarks In the film are literally two frames long so if that annoys you gimme your zip code and i will recommend a movie theatre

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-31-2007 07:12 AM
pjfan0281 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for pjfan0281 Click here to Send pjfan0281 a Private Message Find more posts by pjfan0281 Add pjfan0281 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
wrist
Dec 2004


Senior Member

Video 9
Sound 8
Flik 6

In the current climate this is a good release. Superb pic - good in light and dark scenes. Sound is ok after being doctored. Edit the bit missing with the wizard and it still makes sense to the run of the film. Slap the camera release audio over the silly laughter at the end and you have a great release. I don't know if the end audio was deliberate or what but to me it sounds like that laughter is 'put on'. If this truly is maven great to see you back boys. Its been a really shit couple of months on the scene. Cheers.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-31-2007 07:17 AM
wrist is offline Click Here to See the Profile for wrist Click here to Send wrist a Private Message Find more posts by wrist Add wrist to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
boi xx
May 2007

Registered

::ModEdit: Enable overburn and it will fit::

__________________
!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-06-2007 07:14 AM
boi xx is offline Click Here to See the Profile for boi xx Click here to Send boi xx a Private Message Find more posts by boi xx Add boi xx to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
paul:MASSACRE
Feb 2007

Registered

Dam good release, highly watchable.

v. 8
a. 7 (slightly hollow but no problems)
m. ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-13-2007 09:06 PM
paul:MASSACRE is offline Click Here to See the Profile for paul:MASSACRE Click here to Send paul:MASSACRE a Private Message Find more posts by paul:MASSACRE Add paul:MASSACRE to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.