If the rest of the movie is the same as the sample I give it an 8/8 great job

__________________
Hay

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by likwid8


Ya, thats why it was pointless to make it 3 CD's when extracting the first CD led out to 394 MEGS!!!!

It boggles my mind why they couldnt fill up the rest of the space.... let alone 3 cds? errrrrr

---

Lay off the new guy ... WTF does 394mb have to do with a vcd!?! Your like the ppl that cant figured how you fit a 805mb svcd on a 700mb CD. You'll notice the movie couldnt be put on just 2cd's as is.

Anyway nice source TcS! IMO should have used a SVCD format... maybe next time. Video has some artifacts but is much better then any other rls. Sound is good too. The movie itself isnt as good as I was expecting but maybe I just got too siked up for it beforehand.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

looks damn good...keep up the good work http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/ec18d59d/bc/Yahoo!+Photo+Album/roach1.jpg?pfCvOG.AAQvSickP

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by DJD4566
just letting you guys know the two towers has been nominated for shit for the academy aways crap so theres a dvd screener made

---

probably, but i'm guessing someone at the academy got their shit pushed in for letting that one slip last year. i don't really expect a repeat, but hopefully, i'm wrong

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

just burned this nice rls! i plan on watching it tomorrow. although i think the svcd sample was far superior, i'm very gracious for the great rls from TcS! thanks guys! the svcd sample had MUCH less macro/micro blocks, it looked very clean.

the vcd rip has a shitload of micro blocks all over the movie, and HEAVY macro blocks in dark scenes. in the future it'd be nice to have svcd, but it's free so thanks for taking the time/energy/risk in puttin this flic out!!

__________________
retired from the scene, but still leechin!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Nice rip for a vhs screener to vcd, thanks tcs.

For the cry babies out there this movie could have been done on 2 cd's but then it would have been out of standard and then lots of others would have cried "you didn't do it right". It's one of those damd if you do and damd if you don't things. Also I can tell you it takes more effort to do such a long movie that way when your gonna have to split it dead in the middle to make it work.

Keep up the good work

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Video could have been better, audio is typical for a screener, good movie but not great.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I was gonna reencode the audio as 192k (for myself) so I could just put it on 2 cd's, and when I was looking at the length of the movie I noticed the only reason this doesn't fit on 2 cd's is the 3 minutes of credits. So cut the credits off, and you can get it down to 2 cd's and keep it vcd-compliant.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I saw a few jerky moments on my standalone, but nice quality overall. Audio (treble mainly) seemed distorted at certain points.

Good release overall.

8/7/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

personally i thought this movie did not live up to its potential .. or how should i say could have been a lot fuckin better

it could be just me i was really eager to watch this looking forward to it since late 2001

at least it did not 'blow goats' but not so great

this is an awesome scr esp considerin theatre release date was waht 2 weeks prior?

im a lil puzzled why it was not done svcd as well

8/8/7.5 is my rating based off vcd scr

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Great release but I had some wierd problems with this release which were also apparent in their Adaptation rip, some parts seemed jerky not really a ghosting effect like those in VideoCD TC's but like bad ivtc style jerks but I don't know if that's possible on vcd's. Otherwise, nice quality.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged