VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > VCD > Finding Nemo *SVCD* - TELESYNC - Centropy
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
deathspal
Jun 2003


Registered

I was a little shocked
Lot of people been saying "best rls ever"


lot of camera motion...not like CTP to adjust so much after the start...

Think Spider-man was better....

but still a K A Rls....

7v
9a

8m

DeathsPal

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-14-2003 06:24 AM
deathspal is offline Click Here to See the Profile for deathspal Click here to Send deathspal a Private Message Visit deathspal's homepage! Find more posts by deathspal Add deathspal to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
sleeper0
May 2003

Registered

wasnt going to grab a version of this fliuck but wanted to see what the buzz was about. Video is great, color is amazing and very sharp, sound started out a tiny amount over driven but is corrected early on. Great release but i'm not going to watch the rest of it.

9/8/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-14-2003 09:12 AM
sleeper0 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for sleeper0 Click here to Send sleeper0 a Private Message Find more posts by sleeper0 Add sleeper0 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
jacobtf
Not Yet

Guest

I was thinking the same. I checked the release and there was constantly camera movement! That's not exactly what I'd call a super ts.

Also, sound isn't really that good. I've seen far better svcd ts from ctp.

If I were to judge this without knowing where it came form, I'd have labeled it CAM. A good cam, but a cam nevertheless.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-14-2003 10:43 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AceOvArts
Not Yet

Guest

7.5/7/9

there is some camera movement and the usual slight bleeching in the video. Also, Ive noticed a drop in Centropy audio quality from previous releases, wonder why that is, just didnt seem as clean as some of the older rls.
Still a great TS and way better than even some groups screeners so keep up the great work guys !! (I appreciate it heaps)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-14-2003 11:01 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
spdabbs
Nov 2002

Registered

quote:
Originally posted by jacobtf
I was thinking the same. I checked the release and there was constantly camera movement! That's not exactly what I'd call a super ts.

Also, sound isn't really that good. I've seen far better svcd ts from ctp.

If I were to judge this without knowing where it came form, I'd have labeled it CAM. A good cam, but a cam nevertheless.



You're right, it is a CAM, but one with direct sound, as all TS's are!

CAM - Recorded in a cinema using the cameras microphone
TS - Recorded in a cinema using a direct sound connection (i.e. a headphone socket)

Just thought I'd clear that up for you.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-14-2003 07:05 PM
spdabbs is offline Click Here to See the Profile for spdabbs Click here to Send spdabbs a Private Message Find more posts by spdabbs Add spdabbs to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
pHo
Oct 2001


pjeer?

having the password as "heh" was kinda pointless. it would take a bruteforce cracker about 20secs to find the password out of a 3 character pass

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-14-2003 07:45 PM
pHo is offline Click Here to See the Profile for pHo Click here to Send pHo a Private Message Visit pHo's homepage! Find more posts by pHo Add pHo to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
sam_I_am
Not Yet

Guest

The video was great, but the sound had a slight buzz. So I'll rate this 9/7/8.

The movie was pretty good (as judged by my four year old daughter).

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-15-2003 11:08 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
frak
May 2002

Senior Member

I watched this release tonight.

This is quite possibly the best TS release I've ever seen.

Centropy is just out of control these days.

video: 9.5
sound: 8.5
movie: 8

-frak

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-15-2003 11:39 AM
frak is offline Click Here to See the Profile for frak Click here to Send frak a Private Message Find more posts by frak Add frak to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
stall
Not Yet

Guest

just burned it to cd and tested it out on my bigscreen.

it looks like ass, colors are very washed out. 4.0

sounds is your typical CTP quality(too much bass, not DVD clear) 6.0

movie?



it looks good on the pc but not on tv for some reason.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-15-2003 04:14 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bryehn
Feb 2003


1111011011

it's probably not "dvd clear" cause it's NOT FROM A DVD...

looked fine on my TV too, not sure what the hell you were watching...

other than the slight camera movement, most fantastic indeed.

pretty funny movie, too...my only complaint is that pixar spends so much time & effort on making thier characters act human, but make thier human characters as cartoony as possible...

8/9/7

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-15-2003 07:03 PM
bryehn is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bryehn Click here to Send bryehn a Private Message Visit bryehn's homepage! Find more posts by bryehn Add bryehn to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
LOLobo
Jan 2003


Canis rufus atheist

quote:
Originally posted by AceOvArts
7.5/7/9

there is some camera movement and the usual slight bleeching in the video. Also, Ive noticed a drop in Centropy audio quality from previous releases, wonder why that is, just didnt seem as clean as some of the older rls.
Still a great TS and way better than even some groups screeners so keep up the great work guys !! (I appreciate it heaps)



About 3 or 4 people mention camera movement. Let's be a little more specific to vq readers.

This release contains a on old pixar film created back in 1989 called "Knick Knack" (which is quite amusing). During this short film (could be the way I burned the CD) I noticed a slight glich that lasted for about 1/2 second. No biggie.

The so-called "camera movement" that keeps getting brought up.... OCCURRED ONCE. This happend at the beginning of the film and lasted for about 1 second. It just looks like someone bumped the camera, however, the picture did not suffer because of it afterwards.

If you're going to take the time to post at this forum, might as well read what you write afterwards, see how it makes the release sound. No point in being vague and just saying there was "camera movement" when it makes the release sound like the person in charge of the camera (which would be on a tripod anyways) was going through heroin withdrawls during the film.

Oh, and I didn't notice any "sound quality drops". Compared to the shit audio of some of the other group's releases, ctp has no issues there, with this flick or any of it's last couple. The audio is fine, no hollowness and easy to understand. WTF? Drop in audio quality? Whatever, no reason to nit-pic a good release just because most of their releases are superior to that of other groups. Other groups are coming up, they are taking note. Quality over quickness.

Last edited by LOLobo on 06-15-2003 at 07:40 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-15-2003 07:35 PM
LOLobo is offline Click Here to See the Profile for LOLobo Click here to Send LOLobo a Private Message Visit LOLobo's homepage! Find more posts by LOLobo Add LOLobo to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Air1
Jan 2003


In the Cockpit

is this a CLASSIC example where the JPG's make the release look alot better than it really is or what?

7.5/7/x

alot of colors, so that's nice. motion blur is really bad and any and everything on the screen is pretty damn blurry. even the sample looks alot better than it does when it's burned and playing on the 'tube.

i've seen much better from CTP.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-15-2003 08:48 PM
Air1 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Air1 Click here to Send Air1 a Private Message Find more posts by Air1 Add Air1 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ember
Not Yet

Guest

The centropy rls is MUCH better than the ftf--the only way I can see it being any better is the DVD. The first release was watchable, but you lost all of the finer nuances in facial expression and backgrounds that were visable here. There was only ONE camera movement that I saw toward the beginning and only one appreciable glitch in the sound, also early on in the movie. Not at all as bad as some of you are saying--did you watch the whole movie? And, if you think the colors are bleached out, than perhaps you are used to the many darker rlses and you need to adjust your tv back? And let's face it--if you're watching ANYTHING on a bigger screen, it's going to lose a bit of clarity--that's the nature of it. I just wish that more rlses were this good.
9/9/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-15-2003 09:12 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
deathspal
Jun 2003


Registered

quote:
Originally posted by lolobo21


About 3 or 4 people mention camera movement. Let's be a little more specific to vq readers.

This release contains a on old pixar film created back in 1989 called "Knick Knack" (which is quite amusing). During this short film (could be the way I burned the CD) I noticed a slight glich that lasted for about 1/2 second. No biggie.

The so-called "camera movement" that keeps getting brought up.... OCCURRED ONCE. This happend at the beginning of the film and lasted for about 1 second. It just looks like someone bumped the camera, however, the picture did not suffer because of it afterwards.

If you're going to take the time to post at this forum, might as well read what you write afterwards, see how it makes the release sound. No point in being vague and just saying there was "camera movement" when it makes the release sound like the person in charge of the camera (which would be on a tripod anyways) was going through heroin withdrawls during the film.

Oh, and I didn't notice any "sound quality drops". Compared to the shit audio of some of the other group's releases, ctp has no issues there, with this flick or any of it's last couple. The audio is fine, no hollowness and easy to understand. WTF? Drop in audio quality? Whatever, no reason to nit-pic a good release just because most of their releases are superior to that of other groups. Other groups are coming up, they are taking note. Quality over quickness.




I must have watched another CTP rLS of Nemo...cause

! yes it isn.t like "heroin withdrawls" but it wasn't the 1/2 a second once, as you stated either... it hapens like 4-5 times as late in the movie as the second disk.

2. Yes CTP is the best... But their not GOD either... so when a bunch of people whom have only seen the .jpg (not saying you lolobo2 havent) are saying it is the best rls the they have ever seen...well.....

3.I thought the audio was fine... but that's just my $.5x4

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-16-2003 04:25 AM
deathspal is offline Click Here to See the Profile for deathspal Click here to Send deathspal a Private Message Visit deathspal's homepage! Find more posts by deathspal Add deathspal to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
JTMON
Not Yet

Guest

nice colors
pixelation on fast motion
bleh

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-16-2003 05:25 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AceOvArts
Not Yet

Guest

lolobo21

quote:
If you're going to take the time to post at this forum, might as well read what you write afterwards, see how it makes the release sound. No point in being vague and just saying there was "camera movement" when it makes the release sound like the person in charge of the camera (which would be on a tripod anyways) was going through heroin withdrawls during the film.

Oh, and I didn't notice any "sound quality drops". Compared to the shit audio of some of the other group's releases, ctp has no issues there, with this flick or any of it's last couple. The audio is fine, no hollowness and easy to understand. WTF? Drop in audio quality? Whatever, no reason to nit-pic a good release just because most of their releases are superior to that of other groups. Other groups are coming up, they are taking note. Quality over quickness.


If you want to suck ass all the time when you post then thats fine, but it wont help groups improve thier own standards.
Ive heard better sound from centropy in past releases and there was camera movement. I dunno whats so vague about that comment, unless you want me to provide you with the timecode this happens ?
This forum is for posting your marks on the quality of audio and video of releases, the way this forum is setup allows you to justify your opinion by stating why you gave those marks. Thats what I did, so dont sit up there on your high horse trying to slag off people you disagree with, thats no way to discuss a release.
Just give your marks, tell everyone why and then let people judge for themselves, its not rocket science...is it ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-16-2003 09:50 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
psyche
Jun 2003

Liberal Activist

Movie OWNED! Don't hate, I enjoyed it and I'm not 5 years old. The release was good but quality was way overhyped by alot of you. Nice colorful image BUT OMG! the constant camcorder movement was really getting to me, it didn't just happen at the start. It happens everytime I think it's about to go away! Sound was sweet though, kind of loud at times but good. This is nowhere near the best TS though. 7/8/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-16-2003 11:29 AM
psyche is offline Click Here to See the Profile for psyche Click here to Send psyche a Private Message Find more posts by psyche Add psyche to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
tha_realist_one
Not Yet

Guest

Gotta agree with psyche ...."quality was way overhyped by alot of you". Very true it's no where near as good as the jpg looks! Picture was just as good as ftf and they were both TS but yet ftf got a lower rating. Some of you idiots need to watch the movie before you give it a rating. I'm not in any way saying I could do any were near as good as Centropy with all the good releases they have out there but come on you guys be fair to the other rls out there. Centropy ownz for TS.... hands down!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-17-2003 06:52 AM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Phreaker47
Feb 2003

BANNED

It's not the best TS ever, it just translates better from the cam because it's not a traditional film. It's a good one, but yeah there was some focusing and jittering and crap. CTP still owns anyway.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-17-2003 07:12 AM
Phreaker47 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Phreaker47 Click here to Send Phreaker47 a Private Message Find more posts by Phreaker47 Add Phreaker47 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
gokou
Apr 2002


want to get laid

8/8/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-18-2003 07:14 PM
gokou is offline Click Here to See the Profile for gokou Click here to Send gokou a Private Message Find more posts by gokou Add gokou to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.