wickedsun
Aug 2002
Registered
|
Movie/music companies (monopoly is illegal, so the RIAA/MPAA arent companies, right.. not like they would rig prices on CDs, or movies) have a control of what's being played on the medias. Radio, TV, you name it.
You will also see that they say "IT HURTS THE INDUSTRY". While it is true, they might not be able to suck up every cent they used to get before the net became popular, they are not losing money. It's easy to say that IF a movie they made was crapy, and that lot's of people downloaded it and never bought it, it hurt them. But maybe making a bad movie in the first place was bad?
Let's look at it from another angle. The only traded movies on the net (I mean heavily traded) are movies that are in theatre, making lots of money anyway. Now, would I take the risk of *MAYBE* watch a crappy movie (with 20mins of commercials/previews) for $9, in a theatre, where the food is more expensive than a house? The movie industry has been sucking every dollars they could over the last 20-30 years, and they've been doing it on the fact that we cannot know if we're gonna like what we paid for (i.e. I loved the LOTR, seen them all in theatre, bought them on DVD.. yet I downloaded them).
And one fun twist that's been around for ages about music.. why are CDs more expensive than tapes? Quality? Vinyl has a higher quality, actualy, and when you "buy" a tape/cd, you buy the license that allows you to listen to it, and it's not a "if (%quality >= 22kHz) = %total * 2" license.
I don't post often, but seeing that the director of a movie agrees with me on movies (like, DOWNLOAD MY SHIT, ITS COOL WE'RE ALL BROS AND SHIT), it makes me very happy. Seeing someone in the industry itself agreeing is a very nice feeling 
My 2 cents.
PS: I'll make sure to download it, too :P
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|