video is total sh!t....worst than the first release as said many times alrdy. also, it would be nice to see a release by this grp without heads poppin up in front of the camera....repositioning the camera might eliminate this...but what do i know


4/9/x

still waiting for a better release..even if i have to wait for the dvdrip

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

bravo,
read pot nfo for king arthur & the proper ts of i robot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bravo
Originally posted by bee_nutz
hey bravo,
did you know (s)\vcd's can totally be authored with DTS audio?you blithering idiot.

Bravo-OK i'm an idiot, SO! And can you post a link to back up your statement?

bee_nutz-obviousely it is encoded to mp2.

Bravo-And what was the argument again?
CASE CLOSED!!!!

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by garvey100
Obviously you don't feel the need to know where the audio is sourced from. I personally think that knowing where audio is from gives us a better opportunity to discuss the release. Still you can't get it through your thick skull that it has to mentioned that its from DTS, as this is different to other forms of direct sound. MP2 encodes from different sources are obviously gonna sound different. We ALL know that it is MP2 sound, the group don't insult our ignorance by stating the blatantly obvious, and mention therefore where it is sourced from. You are sounding more ignorant in every post bravo, so now's the time to stop.

---

Gotta love the insults, always leads to a more honest and constructive conversation . True i don't care where the source is from. As long as it is clean. And i can see where knowing what the source is may mean alot to some of you. But calling the audio on the svcd DTS is still wrong. If you call it audio from a DTS source that is different and correct. There are alot of noobs who won't understand your lingo and think they have DTS on a disc.
And don't say it won't happen cause i have seen people who think mono in two speakers is stereo. Let's just call it what it is and nothing more. It is great sound. Probably one of the best released on svcd, but it is not DTS. It's mp2 audio from a dts source.

Last edited by Bravo on 07-20-2004 at 05:25 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This is the worst release i have ever gotten. I see ppls heads leaving to go to the bathroom n then i see them come back. Colors are horrible, screen is blury, it freezes after cd1 n cd2 and i cant even watch the ending.

I give it a 3 or video and a 7 on audio

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

did i grab the wrong rel? audio is awesome. video is all green toned. it was labled the internal svcd rel

?/9/6

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bravo
Gotta love the insults, always leads to a more honest and constructive conversation . True i don't care where the source is from. As long as it is clean. And i can see where knowing what the source is may mean alot to some of you. But calling the audio on the svcd DTS is still wrong. If you call it audio from a DTS source that is different and correct. There are alot of noobs who won't understand your lingo and think they have DTS on a disc.
And don't say it won't happen cause i have seen people who think mono in two speakers is stereo. Let's just call it what it is and nothing more. It is great sound. Probably one of the best released on svcd, but it is not DTS. It's mp2 audio from a dts source.

---

Yeah and I can agree with that. Sorry we had problems........like a fairytale ending eh mate
Maybe they should relable SOURCE in fact.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

It's weird to see 2 releases that needed each other so bad. The FRA cam had a pretty nice pic and bad audio. And this is exactly the opposite. I don't see how anyone can say this video is good. It's green, blurry and washed out. The audio is pretty nice except too quiet. So you take this audio and turn it up and take FRA cam you have a nice release. That's what I did. I've only watched half so far but the movie seems ok to me.

4/8/?

__________________
"with great power comes great responsibility."

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Wow you guys didnt remind me to bring the underwater diving googles so everything else in the room would look as green as the video... Video also a little bit grainy, but not cropped too bad.
And unless I am losing my mind the sync is off a little bit in the first cd (round 15 mins in).

6/8/6

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mystic Slippers
Considering I, Robot was written about 900 zillion years BEFORE The Matrix, someone needs to get their bold statements right.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

6/8/4

Decent release, Not worth a blank CD imo. Not because of the quality, but because I thought the movie was trash.

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

After watching the full vcd, i have to say nuke this one. it is not a ts, people are walking though the screen as it plays, and the picture is shaky/blurred. I do have to agree the audio is excellent

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This one should be nuked for the fact that there's a chunk of film missing in between cd1 and cd2.

:: I have watched this release. There is NOTHING missing. Whatever problems you are having are yours and yours alone. - 404notfound

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Film was worth a watch
Quality was average, Shame about the couple of heads when people were going to the restroom.
Sound was a bit low, but the quality was not 2 bad once the volume was cranked up.

http://storeage.s5.com/store/qbanner.gif

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged