Why the *read nfo* ? If you're gonna proper someone then you're nfo will be read anyway. I tough *read nfo* was only supposed to be used if you had some sort of annoucment to make, but lately its just being used to bash other groups and their releases .

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

true , ReadNFO is often used without sence.

__________________
no idea

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

It think it was better to replace ReadNFO with PROPER

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

It's terrible, disgusting and out of order. Seriously, there should be a law against it. I am sickened by this continual use of *ReadNfo* Even typing this now I feel like a could chunder over my keyboard. I feel my life energy draining away... arggggg.. help....

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Proper means better right ? Maybe someone assumes that and doenst read the nfo, well unless of course its labeled READ NFO ,right? Everyone does read the nfo when they are labeled like that I would hope.

Anyways to the point... I think this is the part they wanted everybody to read below.

we do hope you enjoy this release and stop bitching about the releases.remember they are free if you dont like it dont download

Amen to that xv, but this is vcdquality you know.
Not that this messsage was just to us but i think it is ok to say wether or not we liked it and why here.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

The term read nfo is simple its for the site ops b4 they auto nuke
it since there is a (ftf ts) teg(subbed) some kiddies may just nuke it waiting for the dvd screener
And b4 anyone says check the sample out ,anyone with intellegance will tell you its easy to make a film look better than it is with selected parts of the movie

__________________
I was never caught!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Has anyone actually seen this rls or a sample??

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

ok the jpg looks good what r u bitches complaining about i know u r not supposed 2 judge by the jpgs but they help me decide 2 get the release or not i have not yet downloaded this release i think im gonna get this one unless its that bad can anyone give an actual review on this ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i have seen the sample to this,

the picture forom what i can see seems to be a bit blurry, FTF's rls was Crispy but quite block. there are 2 downfalls to this rls. the ennoying J on teh left and about 50-75 pixels of black on the right side.

i cant really jusdge it fully. it woudl of been better to see the action scene. but i am happywith the ftf rls for now.

although i do think it should be nuked for bad labelling. in the NFO it says that it is better than any other rlses all pointing to it being a proper but it is not. really it shoudl be considered as a dupe.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Just saw the sample..
Picture is good.. but a bit blurry, but good anough to watch.

Sound is a bit hard.. and not that clear tho but good anough to listen too.

There was only some singing and talking in the sample so could be that with explosions etc the sound will be very bad.. but other then that.. its good anough to watch... and its only 2 cds....

but i do get a feeling that there will be a better one soon.. but that can be said about every release hehehe..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

the quality of the video is just as good as ftf, this is no proper, if you look closely at the video it seems it was from a vhs source... the audio is mildly better however... but still quite a pointless release, should of done internal imho

__________________
cC.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

maybe we should only be allowed to vote between 2/2/2 and 9/9/9 because i havent done all 10's or all 1's but allegedly i have done this and have been banned from voting?.
could somebody explain to me what is the point of having the out of 10 voting system if we are not allowed to vote for some releases how we see fit-it kind of renders the whole thing pointless?.
i await the usual mature replies
however- 3/4/3

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by strawhair
maybe we should only be allowed to vote between 2/2/2 and 9/9/9 because i havent done all 10's or all 1's but allegedly i have done this and have been banned from voting?.
could somebody explain to me what is the point of having the out of 10 voting system if we are not allowed to vote for some releases how we see fit-it kind of renders the whole thing pointless?.
i await the usual mature replies
however- 3/4/3

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

again with the goddamn read-nfo's. read-nfo should only be used to explain something specfic about the release. maybe the audio is fucked for 2 mins on cd 2, but it's worlds better than previous releases. that's when you put in a read-nfo, dumbasses, not to explain lame proper reasons..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by cofferscuffs
if you look closely at the video it seems it was from a vhs source...

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Natural
again with the goddamn read-nfo's. read-nfo should only be used to explain something specfic about the release. maybe the audio is fucked for 2 mins on cd 2, but it's worlds better than previous releases. that's when you put in a read-nfo, dumbasses, not to explain lame proper reasons..

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Xiphi



ahum... then it should be a vhs screener. but according to the sample its a cam.. a good cam...


about the sample:

there is a R in the screen on the left that stays there and its missing something on the left or its filmed too much to the right..

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr_Grinch


Maybe it was Cam'd, recorded to vhs and then converted to mpg.

---

everything is possible these day's

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I think this movie sucked really bad, so if you REALLY REALLY like stupid fucking Star Trek maybe you will like this, but I fell asleep when I went to see it in the theatres.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Nuff is Nuff!!

I happen to be one of THOSE who like the ST series, and have been waiting for the screener to come out. It's been long enough for a release, and the CAMS/ SYNCS are just there to mellow the masses when a movie first comes out. It's been out long enough, and no other cams or syncs or even propers are really needed, just a screener, and be done with it. But I guess someone has to try and get a very small piece of the 15 min fame thing trying to release a movie that did poor in the box office, and seems to have no interest even in the VCDQuality community even. But we all do love bithing about the poor quality of this release, it seems to give us a purpose here on the boards....sheeze!

Ragin!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged