Vtec
Not Yet
Guest
|
Re: right.......
quote:
Originally posted by b00bie
This is lame ,UTi beat them......
However the reason for proper isnt far fetched , they still should have internalled it, also the quality is not as expected from TCF, they didnt utilize about 200megs which would have highered the quality by a significant amount , but as i said TCF have been getting hammered this oscar season after owning all year, as i said lame proper .......sound is ok though :P
How is this lame? Uti's version was good no doubt but compared to this release with absolutely no watermarks (especially since Uti's had watermarks which covered half the screen during the entire time). Quality is great from what I've seen in the sample and if you grabbed the nfo fix you would see why CD2 is small, Uti's release was 2x53(2x74min CDR) = 106 x 15mb total. TCF's is 1x57(80min CDR) plus 1x48 = 105 x 15mb total, basically the same size with a reason as to why. Do the math, and although they haven't released consecutively as TDi/OBUS they're still releasing as many (or more) DVD Screeners this season (14 since october from what vcdquality lists if you click on the group name and some of my favorite titles such as 007, Bowling For Columbine and Rules Of Attraction).
Last edited by on 01-10-2003 at 09:34 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
01-10-2003 08:30 PM
