is it againt the watermark all over the movie?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Another bogus movie.....TCF just isnt getting the good stuff lately Screw this gay ass cartoon, what it last in the theater...1/2 week? plus the holidays are long over, save it for next yr

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Don't flame TCF just because they arent on a roll now. I bet they will pick up soon. They are still one of the finest release groups out there. All groups (Most Anyways) deserve credit for what they do. Nobody else has the guts to release, so why flame?

__________________
[--Quality over Quantity always--]

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

nice release..

tcf shouldnt have made it internal.. althou this movie http://static.vcdquality.com:8080/sample/id8807.jpg
das been done before..

tcf rocks on this release.. and well

nice work people..

all u flamers.. no more info bout what ever from me..

i hate to see this stupid comments .. i used to do ratings.. but well now i only dropped by to give my respect to tcf..

and well thats all..

this board is goin down the drain cuase people are to lame to make a comment on the quality..



all u newbies get lost..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

^....that was a shitty telecine, and tcf's version rocks that piece of shit. videocd sucks. they should just leave the scene. the sound on that release (and maid in manhattan) is horrible.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i agree with what tcf said in nfo...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by slowbus
^....that was a shitty telecine, and tcf's version rocks that piece of shit. videocd sucks. they should just leave the scene. the sound on that release (and maid in manhattan) is horrible.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

im just saying, they can't rip thier audio first off. thats really only thing i have against them, they say they have telecine releases (which they are) but the shittiest audio in the world, sounds like they didnt plug their audio jack into the reel or something. =[

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Not needed. THe serial and Counter counteract Videocds bad points.

6 7 6

TCF, you should know, a few Good quality rlses outway Lots of so so ones.

PS There is no way a TCF Internal would ever stay internal

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

fuck the flamers, they internaled it cuz they knew it wasnt necessary to release when they had it, now they release it as another option for you to DL, quit whinin bitches

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

not one of tcf's greatest screeners even for a cartoon the movie also sux so i will not be getting this 7/7/4

annoiying ass watermarks suck

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

LOOK AT THESE ASS CLOWNS:
sanne123 10 10 10
Vtec 8 10 7

Someone wanna ban em ? gimme a break 10 for sound and 8/10 for vid its a joke have they even seen the sample???!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this movie was by far the worst adam sandler flick ever. Save your bandwidth for better downloads.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Someone wanna ban em ? gimme a break 10 for sound and 8/10 for vid its a joke have they even seen the sample???!

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Swimj
LOOK AT THESE ASS CLOWNS:
sanne123 10 10 10
Vtec 8 10 7

Someone wanna ban em ? gimme a break 10 for sound and 8/10 for vid its a joke have they even seen the sample???!

---

Someone wanna ban you for contradicting your own posts? Swinging off nuts of one group for a release when the retail was due even earlier than another? or even making a dumb statement about a group slacking and losing quality when they released a fine vhs screener (I-Spy) and only fucked up on 8 mile and punch drunk love as far as I remember? I did see the sample, and although I feel that this release was not needed it IS internal so that doesn't hurt. Vivid colors and motion compensation is alot better than the TC, sound is also 100x's better and there's no doubt about that cause we all know VideoCD can't encode audio. Maybe you should download the sample instead of looking at jpegs, from your voting history you give shitty groups with shitty quality high markings. I mean come on 8-9's on FTF/A-Team TS's and also on iNTENSE's crappy STV FS DVD Screeners which look like they've been mastered from a a paper bag when you vote lower for every other group's DVD Screeners. Put on some glasses and examine who really has the eye problem.

quote:

---

Originally posted by SeeDee
Not needed. THe serial and Counter counteract Videocds bad points.

---

The last one had a counter also and black including white screens, pop up watermarks, and bad sound. But I agree that this release isn't needed for those who watched the TC. Sample was a funny scene though

Last edited by on 01-14-2003 at 11:33 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Good Point Vtec... Very well put.

the movie itself was not that great but the release was good.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Vtec you made absolutley no point, make a point then post you didnt even post about anything releated to the movie.....

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Swimj
Vtec you made absolutley no point, make a point then post you didnt even post about anything releated to the movie.....

---

wow, great comeback once again. I guess I see that I've pushed the limits of your intelligence so now we're playing the blame game This site should be called titlequality.com! since most users DO judge a release by it's title not by it's quality (which I always determine by a sample, never by the jpeg). If it's a good film with good labeling it'll get good marks to most of yall, a film like this which is not good yet encoded well gets a 4 for video from swimj (it's that bad? why? no pixelation, smooth motion, etc.), a 5 for audio (I don't recall any hissing, distortion, muffled, etc.), so as you can see... morons and the REAL jpeg viewers expose themselves.

Last edited by on 01-15-2003 at 01:57 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged