[NUKE] :: sub.par.video.quality

Last edited by PRiNT on 04-07-2003 at 10:26 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Video looks awful .

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

well.. looks good 4 me.. i would give it 7.5/7.5/x.x

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I wouldnt say "awful" its a little blurry and pixelated, but pretty good, im gonna watch with anyway, sound is always good fro a scr and is in this case, ugly watermark, but that aint nothing!

7/9/?

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

if ppl bitch about watermarks and blur.. i would say.. buy the retail dvd or watch it at cinema..:>

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

just watched the sample..not great qual but decent enough to watch

7,5/8/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

ZaeroNIX
10 9 9

Are you sure you watched the right sample? The video is blurry and has a counter and a watermark. A 10? more like a 7 for video.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

not too good ;(

well i watched the sample and this isnt any great stuff at all, blurs on the left, counter on the upper right and big text mark on the bottom, not really sharp picture, well well its maybe watchable for some but not that good for a screener, still big thnx for the release, keep it up

6/7/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

BLURS on the left = coverd serials..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Yep, the video is awful, and now its nuked to..

lol

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

:: Another TS mislabled to SCreener from VideoCD ::

realized:

i dont think u watched right sample.. heh.. since when did TS had fat watermarks..? this u have to realize what u are talking about before u open your mounth..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

hmm this wasnt nuked on any of my sites, the quality is quite nice, the tcf version was better i think...

7/8/8

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

grainy motion movement the ts was better then the screener.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

the video is not good cuz of all the watermarks
audio is not so good ether
movie has its funny parts

6/7/7

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

---

Last edited by kalvaitis007 on 04-07-2003 at 11:22 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This is not the quality ya expect from a screener. video quality looks more like a TS to me then a screener, audio aint that bad, not great either.
5/5/?
better luck next time

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

6/7/7

Last edited by kalvaitis007 on 04-08-2003 at 05:00 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by B16A2
If dog shit was free, I'd still complain about it.

---

you pay for dog shit? thats fucked up dude

as for this thread, its gonna have to get a cleanup due to the usual bullshit between people, so expect posts to disappear.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Cleanup finished. Listen up people, if you start talking about which users are in what group, TRUE OR NOT, I will ban you with the quickness.

-K

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quality is ok but the movie is garbage.. sound is okay too...

this movie blows big time..

the property thing is mad annoying!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

my vote!

i give it a 5/7/3!
it is watchible but not the best in quality
good rls

__________________
~morning glory dreams~

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged