Nice colors, no angle, little pixelated but on tv i never notice that, good rls, i saw the movie in theatres, best movie ive seen all year for sure, prob going to be #2 to matrix 2 :O, sound is also pretty damn good too 8/9/9.5
__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit
looks a little dark, sound is good though, pic quality dosent seem that great to the 1st subbed cam rlz though..... maybe svcd is getting a little overkill ?
looks good, beats the est, sound seems a little low but extremly clear.. Almost liek a decent screener, i think they took a bad part of the movie to make the sample(not much action to seem theme, etc) but its good.. I watched the first est and this one is quite a bit better(no subs too )
yes does still have slight angle..... but get over it ......
very nice clear and sharp pic... dark sample should have chosen a better scene .... but if u know how it looks in the dark ,,,, u can pretty much tell the rest .... so wise choice i guess
7 for pic... 7 for sound and 8 for flik ..
Last edited by kalvaitis007 on 05-05-2003 at 12:32 AM
no angle and judging from disc 1, it looks just as good as Confidence. audio is great but not the best ive heared from them. 10/8 and ive just started watching the movie so i cant rate that yet
Nice sharp video, solid colors, decent audio, slight angle BUT butchered on the sides, top and bottom which I personally can not tolerate (you'd think they'd fix it for such a major release, guess not). If you can handle that then cool, this release is for you or else I'd recommend waiting for a telecine/screener (or catch it in the theatre, imo not worth it) if you want to do this movie any justice. 7/8/9
:: don't complain about your posts being removed. Just post better quality comments. -K::
Last edited by kalvaitis007 on 05-05-2003 at 12:52 AM
Thank you CTP. There is no angle on this! It is nice pic and sound (low but good). People just looking for reasons to bash a CTP release, I can side with you though, I look for reasons to bash a sWs release, but I dont have to look as hard.
05-04-2003 11:41 PM
)
