Source is good but I think it would have been just as good if encoded as VCD. The quality is on par with TCF's VHS Screeners and you can kind of see a vhs type noise overlaying the image which isn't apparent in other VHS SVCD Screeners like ViPER's Freddy Vs. Jason. Sound is good though, gj CTP. 7/9/8

Last edited by psyche on 10-28-2003 at 01:54 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I hope this doesn't become some new found thing. If you don't want to use VCD, then use CVD, specially made for VHS sources. SVCD for VHS is a waste. Kill Bill SVCD was an exception as it was gorgeous.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

if this has been nuked for not being SWAT, WTf is it? is it still a decent enough movie to grab lol. i wouldnt expect a group like CTP to screw up like this.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i havent taken a look myself, but i notice it says its nuked cuz its not swat?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

swat is definetly not packaged inside

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

yup , didnt download it myself but seen Nuked : Reason - Both CD's are CD1 , STV , Actually the movie "together". Shit Happens .

ermm also heard it might be - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0332639/ . Either or , Still not S.W.A.T

Personally didnt download it , Just Seen alot of Nukes

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Last edited by firefighter on 10-28-2003 at 05:11 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

to be honest i don't think it was centropy that rls'd this at all. i think it's someone being stupid and trying to make centropy look like crap..

7/7/8 (whatever this movie is, its pretty good)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

wow lets all point at psyche for looking like a dumbass kids.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Yeah Psyche and Mystic Slippers should watch the "package" before commenting. Your right, they both look like dumbass kids who like to post first, even if its nonsense.

::edit- you mean like this post? -M$

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

So what movie is the JPG from?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

rofl psyche and yeh M$ didnt post anything about the "sample"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I'm sure there's a reasonable explanation

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

the sample is swat and it looks fine, ms owns u all neway so his post and psyche's both were legible. They probably just mispackaged the wrong mpg and got it all fuxored up or something...for the one person who said tcr is better then ctp, just cuz ctp hasnt rlsed a ts in a while, don't mean they r better. CTP has been putting out quality rips longer then you have even heard about vcdquality so just stop talking..sample is good 8/8/6 and the movie is iffy..waiting for a repack.

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

silly rabbits, tricks are for kids

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by psyche
Source is good but I think it would have been just as good if encoded as VCD. The quality is on par with TCF's VHS Screeners and you can kind of see a vhs type noise overlaying the image which isn't apparent in other VHS SVCD Screeners like ViPER's Freddy Vs. Jason. Sound is good though, gj CTP. 7/9/8

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

the sample pic on vcdq isnt swat, but i just dled and unrared the actual files and it is s.w.a.t. i would rate the vid an 8 sound an 8 movie a 9 good job centropy vcdq you need to update your pic, it is the real deal

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by commiewhore
the best part is you made this whole judgement, on a movie that isnt the right movie....man, thats fucking funny, nice job senor

---

Last edited by psyche on 10-28-2003 at 09:26 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

yes , and judging by a sample really tells you if the movies correct doesn't it. judging by samples = lame way to get on the forum first if you ask me.

oh and i didn't delete your post if you were wondering, but i saw it. you pointed out the wrong grammatical mistake tho, it was supposed to be "for looking like a dumbass, kids." i missed the "," rather than making a plural by mistake. i just couldn't be bothered to correct it.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i never said tcr was better that ctp, i highly respect ctp for all their extremely high qulity TS's, but recently they havent been doing so well, most of their releases havenmt been ts's and their aint been good really. but people always talk about waiting for a centropy release and that everything else is shit without checking them out. they need to give other groups a chance, VideoCD and TCR are doing really well as groups just now and deserve their respect

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I saw swat before so I knew I was judging the correct film. And the sample is suppose to be just that, a sample of the final encode (don't get mad at me for CTP packing the wrong release but the right sample). Don't give me that "judging by samples = lame" crap, as if you've never judged a release by it's sample. I'm sure you completely DL and watch every release in it's entirety before you give your comments right pHo? At least the first post in this thread is informative instead of the usual "oh, this is cool... ctp you rock" posts. Just admit I'm right for once and you had to retaliate before making a fool of yourself. I don't care about the previously deleted post as long as it was read

Last edited by psyche on 10-28-2003 at 09:55 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged