IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Report this post to a moderator |

cd2 dont look like the same source as cd1 but other than that its dark like every other telecine sound is not the best seems like nbp does a lot of drive in audio.



7/6/5 it was ok.

__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world."
-Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by dwayne
cd2 dont look like the same source as cd1

---

&

quote:

---

Originally posted by austin64
Was it just me or did anyone else's cd 2 overlap cd 1 and then there is a missing gap between cd 2 and cd 3. The video from cd 2 is clearly different than cd 1 and 2.

---

Ill try and clear this up and make sence of what happened (from what i seen).

Wedding.Crashers.TC.SVCD-NBP
CD1 = nbp-wctc1.part01.rar
CD2 = nbp-wcts2.part01.rar
CD3 = nbp-wctc3.part01.rar

Wedding.Crashers.TS.SVCD-NBP
CD2 = nbp-wcts2.part01.rar

See what happened ?

Some idiot somewhere along the line traded CD2 of Wedding Crashers TS into the TC folder which then started a chain reaction.

Find the CD2 folder with nbp-wctc2.part01.rar

------------------------------------------

As for this copy, The picture almost reminds me of a Cropped Wastedtime Screener , picture is really grainy. Dark like most the TC's latley have been , there seems to be flicking or glitching on the top 1/4 of the screen. Colors are faded. On a side note at least you can see the screen artifacts unlike most the "TC"'s latley. Sound is a bit muffled.

Best Copy out to date.

:: EDiT :: Just burnt CD1 of the ASTEROiDS XViD and popped into the standalone , and i do gotta say this , although its watchable and best copy out to date ... that doesnt say much. As a TC this looks like ubber crap on the standalone.

As a TC:
4/6.5/9 found it hilarious

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by betelgeus on Fantastic.Four.2005.SCREENER-TUBE
i know exactly what a screener is and have done for 20 years.

screener should be dvd quality with hallmarks and trust me on this

so ask next question!

---

Last edited by Airhead2 on 09-18-2005 at 07:04 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Picture is grainy... Audio is passable... NBP release another TS under the guise of a TC.

How the heck does NBP have the nerve to mislabel what are obviously TS's? They should be punished.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Was it just me or did anyone else's cd 2 overlap cd 1 and then there is a missing gap between cd 2 and cd 3. The video from cd 2 is clearly different than cd 1 and 2.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

3 disc's????

why the 3 disc's

ok the movie great but 3 disc's

simple to encode to kvcd or vcd on 1 disc

encode then encode again you lose the quality.

any1 that says "oh what you winging about" or "shut up it's free" pi*s off

it's doin me head in!

1 disc!!!!!!!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this is the same source as the deuce bigalow ts by prodigy. it has the same sharpness to the picture, the same faint vertical lines going down the picture, and that bloody green tint to it. my guess is that it isnt a tc, but a ts.

as a ?:

8/7/10

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this is definitely a ts
v/8 a/8 for a ts
Too many ts's are being labeled telecines what a shame.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I dunno why these groups feel the need to lie about the source like we wont find out anyways lol .. based on a TS 8/7/9 good flick i had some laughs for sure

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Not a TS in my opinion, theres far too much dirt and artifacts on the video, no way a Cam could pick this up from a Cinema screen, it looks more like a very bad TC done with pretty poor equipment.

Sound is ok, but not very good.

As a TC

7/6/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

TC/TS who cares what the lable is anymore , the end of the day this still looks like ubber crap for both standards on standalone.

Ive seen silvers that looked nicer then this "TC"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

where is chakra now theres a group thats been doing top notch telecines for years now

as for this release haha half decent TS but not the best

7/8/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

just watched this release don`t know if its a ts or a tc but very watchable release colours are faded but very clear and no motion blur sound was not excellent but ok film not as good as i was hoping

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This is a definite TS. Just look at the New Line Cinema logo at the beginning. It is way to the left. Crop is really bad on the left side. Just the overall look of the video is reminiscent of a TS. Super grainy, dull colors. The audio, if direct, is shite. It sounds so hollow to me, as if they took the good cam audio off the SILVERS release and filtered the shit out of it. Worst of the "TC" releases as of late. If only they would label correctly, everyone would be praising them, but I guess they don't care. Just trying to get props. Not to say that I don't appreciate the release. I just don't appreciate the mislabelling. Keep it up NBP, just learn how to label those silvers.

Video: As a TC: 5 As a TS: 7.5

Audio: 4 (Just sounds so cammish and filtered.)

Movie: 7 (Decent, for a movie with no plot. I laughed, I cried, I smoked a... errr... cigarette, yeah.)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

you people are idiots that do not know the difference between a TS & TC

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

how come when nbp rls's something, asteroids rls the same thing xvid though? is theres the same rip jus encoded to be less cds?

hmmm so im thinkin asteroids is the ts then too???

might have to give nbp's a pass since all the bad ratings for it.

bla

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

:: I AM A GIGANTIC FLAMING RETARD THAT FILLS THE MOD QUEUE WITH UTTER SHIT

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This is definitely a TS.

As a TS: Colors are great and video is clear. The sound kind of sucks to me. It's a little hissy/poppy/muffled. 8/5/8

As a TC: AR isn't right, it's croppped, it's dark and not as clear as a TC should be. Sound blows. 4/5/8

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by gunitnucca
how come when nbp rls's something, asteroids rls the same thing xvid though? is theres the same rip jus encoded to be less cds?

hmmm so im thinkin asteroids is the ts then too???

might have to give nbp's a pass since all the bad ratings for it.

bla

---

__________________
"Signatures Suck"

Last edited by protekt0r on 09-20-2005 at 02:01 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by protekt0r
Asteriods just re-encodes/transcodes other groups releases into XVID.
-protekt0r

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged