VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > Off Topic > Computer and Audio/Video help > diff between + -?
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
kingcyrus
Jan 2003

the king

diff between + -?

I guess I never noticed when they started coming out with +r's.. whats the difference?

reason I'm asking is that I'm getting a dvd burner and probably going to buy a 50 pack of dvd-r's, but they have 50 pack dvd+r's for the same price, the burner im getting will burn both, my dvd player is a couple years old so im thinking i should get dvd-r.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 11-20-2005 04:45 PM
kingcyrus is offline Click Here to See the Profile for kingcyrus Click here to Send kingcyrus a Private Message Find more posts by kingcyrus Add kingcyrus to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
The CandyMan
Dec 2002


Motherfucker!

From www.answerbag.com:

quote:
DVD+R is a dvd disc that allows multiple layers for one disc where as dvd-r only allows one layer. They will not compete to become the de Facto standard, because they are both here to stay. Multi layer DVD+R can allow extra capacity per disc than DVD-R hence its high cost!


quote:
DVD-R:
Benefits: Better DVD playback compatiblity within home DVD players.
Drawbacks: Older technology and less money behind the format means that they come out with faster media and burner technology slower. You will frequently see DVD burners that will support (for instance) 16X DVD+R and only 8X DVD-R.

DVD+R:
Benefits: Faster speeds, more inovations like Double Layer discs (8.5 GB)
Drawbacks: Will not play is some home DVD players. If you know your home DVD player will play DVD+Rs then there is no reason to not use them.



I've always have used -r as I was told they play better on most dvd standalones, which seems to be true from the above statement. Your best bet is try them both and see which one you prefer.

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 11-20-2005 05:46 PM
The CandyMan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for The CandyMan Click here to Send The CandyMan a Private Message Visit The CandyMan's homepage! Find more posts by The CandyMan Add The CandyMan to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
pHo
Oct 2001


pjeer?

that second quote box makes me laugh... what utter rot!

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 11-20-2005 05:54 PM
pHo is offline Click Here to See the Profile for pHo Click here to Send pHo a Private Message Visit pHo's homepage! Find more posts by pHo Add pHo to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
The CandyMan
Dec 2002


Motherfucker!

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
that second quote box makes me laugh... what utter rot!


I wondered about that too, since the dvd burners maintain the same burn speeds for either format, ie. a newer 16x will burn both at that speed, not -r at 12x and +r at 16x. So more than likely, that is bs. As for +r, I've never tried them, but then I've had nothing but great results with -r in all my players.

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 11-20-2005 06:18 PM
The CandyMan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for The CandyMan Click here to Send The CandyMan a Private Message Visit The CandyMan's homepage! Find more posts by The CandyMan Add The CandyMan to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
marshallar
Dec 2004


Newbie

the first quote made me laugh, since both formats are available as dual layer. My preference is -r because they never fail me with my set top player

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 11-27-2005 11:02 PM
marshallar is offline Click Here to See the Profile for marshallar Click here to Send marshallar a Private Message Find more posts by marshallar Add marshallar to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
sailorboy
Jun 2003

Junior Member

Having been the proud owner of the first DVD burner for my PC (a whole whopping 1 speed and +format) i have seen this debate echoed in all forums. Which one is best? Well. I used to be an avid supporter of the plus format as the discs could be burnt at 2.4 speed and the minus at 2 speed (going back a few years here guys :-) ) but the real problem with plus is that the home DVD players generally turn their nose up at them. As most cheap players use Panasonic parts the cheaper players tend to perform with minus format. (panasonic were the proud inventers of plus and phillips coined in on the plus). BUT for all round PC/DVD Domestic/PS2/XBOX compatability the minus wins hands down.

For whatever reason you need to burn to disc, i would say that the minus format rocks and the plus format sucks big donkey dicks.

The real debate should be which speed is the most reliable for burning DVD Data. If i burn at 12-16 speed i get terrable results yet at 6-8 speed i get fantastic results.

Datawrite forever

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-17-2005 07:49 PM
sailorboy is offline Click Here to See the Profile for sailorboy Click here to Send sailorboy a Private Message Find more posts by sailorboy Add sailorboy to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:01 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdquality.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.