llewhtork
Jul 2005
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by override2k3
right, so you tell me why, because you do not have technology good enough to view the release at its full potential, you give the release a rating based on the b grade playing capabilities of the technology you do own even though theres no way you'd know its full potential? they could make the best dvdr rip ever made in the history of the scene...but because one fag only has a B&W tv and £3.99 dvdplayer you grade them down? my fair rating (because i do have the technology to view this release at its FULL potential) is 9/10/8 (9 being because the video is not untouched, but perfectly mastered)
OK...So by your argument, if you don't have a state of the art system typically owned by ubergeeks, don't rate or pass comment. If I gave the audio a ten because the flick came with 5.1/ DTS (whatever), yet I hadn't actually heard that 5.1/DTS, how can I comment on it? That would make me a fraud as well as giving misleading comments. I comment on what comes out of my tv (3" b+w wind up thing!). The main point of the last statement was more about the abusive terms actually, for example...pHo put his point across well and sounded informed...whereas you came across like a tool.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|