VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DIVX > 3 10 To Yuma *PROPER* *R5* *XviD* - R5 - ASTEROiDS
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
X69
Aug 2001


Administrator


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED



*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Report this post to a moderator |

Old Post 10-11-2007 02:04 AM
X69 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for X69 Click here to Send X69 a Private Message Visit X69's homepage! Find more posts by X69 Add X69 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
j0zj0z
Apr 2007


God member

[NUKE] [ 3.10.To.Yuma.PROPER.R5.LiNE.XviD-ASTEROiDS ] [ invalid.proper_both.cds.undersized_packed.bitstream.not.forbidden_qualitative.should.be.internal]

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 02:05 AM
j0zj0z is offline Click Here to See the Profile for j0zj0z Click here to Send j0zj0z a Private Message Visit j0zj0z's homepage! Find more posts by j0zj0z Add j0zj0z to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
s01o
Jun 2005

Junior Member

I don't care if it's nuked I've missed ASTEROiDS.

Great quality as usual.

V/9
A/9
M/?

Welcome back.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 02:38 AM
s01o is offline Click Here to See the Profile for s01o Click here to Send s01o a Private Message Find more posts by s01o Add s01o to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Bhart
Aug 2006

Member

much better than Pukka

V: 9
A: 10
M: 9


...what a stupid reason to be nuked....

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 03:26 AM
Bhart is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Bhart Click here to Send Bhart a Private Message Find more posts by Bhart Add Bhart to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
X400
Dec 2002

Registered

bah shoulda held out on getting pukka


8/8/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 05:54 AM
X400 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for X400 Click here to Send X400 a Private Message Find more posts by X400 Add X400 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
vcdslut
Jul 2007

Member

first poster was right this is nuked everywhere for unneeded qualitative proper.
tdx rules clearly allow for 116min runtime on a one cd release with a 128bit mp3.
as the others say, 2cd is spam and creditwhoring it adds nothing to the quality

V:9
A:6
M:8 was a damn fine persentation
PUKKA rls was fine, asteroids expected better from a comeback rls than this garbage

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 06:34 AM
vcdslut is offline Click Here to See the Profile for vcdslut Click here to Send vcdslut a Private Message Find more posts by vcdslut Add vcdslut to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CATBOX
Jul 2002

Senior Member

A well deserved proper

I don't know if anyone who posted here actually compared this to Pukka's release, but its a big improvement. Video bitrate is higher, and the sound on this release is 100x better than Pukka's. Pukka's had a horrible hiss to the audio the entire time that occassionally crackled. Asteroids release is clean with no static at all, and nice bass response.

I can see where this could be nuked for undersized discs, but thats just for following a technical scene rule. As for being an "invalid proper" i disagree. Thanks for this much improved release Asteriods!

V - 9
A - 9
M - 7

CATBOX

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 02:18 PM
CATBOX is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CATBOX Click here to Send CATBOX a Private Message Find more posts by CATBOX Add CATBOX to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bi0h4zard
Sep 2007

Registered

V:9
A:9
V:?
Audio is better than Pukka Release.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 04:39 PM
bi0h4zard is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bi0h4zard Click here to Send bi0h4zard a Private Message Find more posts by bi0h4zard Add bi0h4zard to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ATHiEST
Sep 2007


Banned

Re: A well deserved proper

quote:
Originally posted by CATBOX
I don't know if anyone who posted here actually compared this to Pukka's release, but its a big improvement. Video bitrate is higher, and the sound on this release is 100x better than Pukka's. Pukka's had a horrible hiss to the audio the entire time that occassionally crackled. Asteroids release is clean with no static at all, and nice bass response.

I can see where this could be nuked for undersized discs, but thats just for following a technical scene rule. As for being an "invalid proper" i disagree. Thanks for this much improved release Asteriods!

V - 9
A - 9
M - 7

CATBOX



Well if you disagree then you dont really understand.

Its a invalid proper because of the reason they gave, If they had give bad audio as the reason then it would have been valid, but they gave 2 incorrect rule breaks as reasons for proper so it got nuked.

The scene nuke aside asteroids release is allot better quality wise then pukkas due to good audio and higher bitrate video

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 05:13 PM
ATHiEST is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ATHiEST Click here to Send ATHiEST a Private Message Find more posts by ATHiEST Add ATHiEST to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
vcdslut
Jul 2007

Member

CATBOX

you are complaining that it sounds better which don't matter if first rls is fine and real line, pukka won and all reasons in asteroids nfo for reason for proper are bs (yes that's why scene/forum and dupe nukes everywhere) the grp you are supporting doesn't even agree with you they know the audio isn't bad enough to be properable on the 1st rls

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 05:26 PM
vcdslut is offline Click Here to See the Profile for vcdslut Click here to Send vcdslut a Private Message Find more posts by vcdslut Add vcdslut to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Ekno
Apr 2006


Senior Member

AND THE CONCLUSION IS:
grab this rather than PUKKA's release, ASTEROiDS release has better quality.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 06:49 PM
Ekno is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Ekno Click here to Send Ekno a Private Message Find more posts by Ekno Add Ekno to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CATBOX
Jul 2002

Senior Member

Thanks for the replies directly to my comments. I don't want to spam the forum, so this will be my last post in this thread.

Please read the NFO file before making comments that aren't true. Asteroids states THREE reasons for the proper.

"Pukka release has (1)packed bitstream, (2)bad audio and (3)should have been 2 CDs."

I only said i disagreed with the nuke because it is a well deserved proper. I understand that its undersized, but other than that the quality is better than PUKKA all the way around.

CATBOX

I think Ekno's comments sum it up well. :-)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 07:29 PM
CATBOX is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CATBOX Click here to Send CATBOX a Private Message Find more posts by CATBOX Add CATBOX to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
split710
Apr 2003

Member

ehehe

audio of this release is STEALED (as usual for lamers asteroids) from GENUiNE Telesync release, audio is exactly the same, asteroids are more stupids of what all says, they haven't equalized, exactly same graphic at 100% with all most important editing audio programs, some defect also. same not normal rumors.

PUKKA release is OK.

packet bitstrem is prefered to don't use but allowed NO VALID REASON FOR PROPER
PUKKA audio has no problems NO PROPER QUALITATIVE ARE ALLLOWED
2 CD are not valid proper reason

what's this proper considering stealed audio and banned group (for stealing)?

Last edited by split710 on 10-11-2007 at 09:04 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 08:50 PM
split710 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for split710 Click here to Send split710 a Private Message Find more posts by split710 Add split710 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
gezzer
Dec 2005


I smell fish ???

Great release, nice to see asteroids back ,dont give shit about all the bullshit ,9/9/8

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 10:35 PM
gezzer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for gezzer Click here to Send gezzer a Private Message Find more posts by gezzer Add gezzer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ATHiEST
Sep 2007


Banned

quote:
Originally posted by CATBOX
Thanks for the replies directly to my comments. I don't want to spam the forum, so this will be my last post in this thread.

Please read the NFO file before making comments that aren't true. Asteroids states THREE reasons for the proper.

"Pukka release has (1)packed bitstream, (2)bad audio and (3)should have been 2 CDs."

I only said i disagreed with the nuke because it is a well deserved proper. I understand that its undersized, but other than that the quality is better than PUKKA all the way around.

CATBOX

I think Ekno's comments sum it up well. :-)



Yes and thats the whole point, you cant proper a release because of quality reasons, Only if the original release is broken or breaks a scene rule. So its you who should do some reading before commenting.

This should have just been tagged internal not proper.


[EDIT] In response to the below comment: Nobody is saying that this isnt the best, it is the best quality. What is been said is regards to the scene nuke status.

Last edited by ATHiEST on 10-12-2007 at 12:24 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2007 10:43 PM
ATHiEST is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ATHiEST Click here to Send ATHiEST a Private Message Find more posts by ATHiEST Add ATHiEST to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
RipBlippley
Aug 2006

Registered

quote:
Originally posted by gezzer
Great release, nice to see asteroids back ,dont give shit about all the bullshit ,9/9/8


I agree. I could care less about the bullshit... I just download and watch what's best. This one's the best.

v9
a8
m9 (It's no Unforgiven, but still a pretty good western)

__________________
Why pay?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-12-2007 12:14 AM
RipBlippley is offline Click Here to See the Profile for RipBlippley Click here to Send RipBlippley a Private Message Find more posts by RipBlippley Add RipBlippley to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Tork
Mar 2002

Registered

V: 8.999
A: 8.899
M: ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-12-2007 03:45 AM
Tork is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Tork Click here to Send Tork a Private Message Find more posts by Tork Add Tork to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
DexterGr
Oct 2007

Registered

It seems to me that the problem is the "proper" tag in the title? What I'm trying to say is that, if ASTEROiDS didn't post that release as a "proper", it wouldn't be nuked right?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-12-2007 06:17 AM
DexterGr is offline Click Here to See the Profile for DexterGr Click here to Send DexterGr a Private Message Visit DexterGr's homepage! Find more posts by DexterGr Add DexterGr to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
eboskie1
Mar 2004

Registered

quote:
Originally posted by DexterGr
It seems to me that the problem is the "proper" tag in the title? What I'm trying to say is that, if ASTEROiDS didn't post that release as a "proper", it wouldn't be nuked right?


I believe it would have been nuked anyways as a DUPE so there arent doubles of the same thing ie two R5s, there has to be a reason to release a video on the scene that someone else has already released. They could have releaesed it as an internal which cant be nuked.

Last edited by eboskie1 on 10-12-2007 at 08:13 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-12-2007 08:08 AM
eboskie1 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for eboskie1 Click here to Send eboskie1 a Private Message Find more posts by eboskie1 Add eboskie1 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Cr-critic
Jan 2007

Senior Member

quote:
Originally posted by DexterGr
It seems to me that the problem is the "proper" tag in the title? What I'm trying to say is that, if ASTEROiDS didn't post that release as a "proper", it wouldn't be nuked right?


naw its called invalid proper because the pukka wasn't nuked [ a nuke is required before a PROPER is allowed] although pukka has poor audio [on computer] R5 can have perfect Video and even have the shittiest cam audio[as the R5 had russian audio so they used a different audio source] and it won't get nuked.....so asteroids did everyone a favor they made 2 cd's because max decent video is 105 minutes per cd and this movie is closer to 120 also they used a superior audio source.......so yea its nuked and yes its a far better release.......... funny eh lol [ Asteroids could have done an internal release instead of proper to avoid the nuke ]

3:10.To.Yuma.Internal.R5.XviD.ASTEROiDS

Last edited by Cr-critic on 10-12-2007 at 11:30 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-12-2007 09:58 AM
Cr-critic is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Cr-critic Click here to Send Cr-critic a Private Message Find more posts by Cr-critic Add Cr-critic to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.