ATHiEST
Sep 2007
 Banned
|
quote: Originally posted by CATBOX
Thanks for the replies directly to my comments. I don't want to spam the forum, so this will be my last post in this thread.
Please read the NFO file before making comments that aren't true. Asteroids states THREE reasons for the proper.
"Pukka release has (1)packed bitstream, (2)bad audio and (3)should have been 2 CDs."
I only said i disagreed with the nuke because it is a well deserved proper. I understand that its undersized, but other than that the quality is better than PUKKA all the way around.
CATBOX
I think Ekno's comments sum it up well. :-)
Yes and thats the whole point, you cant proper a release because of quality reasons, Only if the original release is broken or breaks a scene rule. So its you who should do some reading before commenting.
This should have just been tagged internal not proper.
[EDIT] In response to the below comment: Nobody is saying that this isnt the best, it is the best quality. What is been said is regards to the scene nuke status.
Last edited by ATHiEST on 10-12-2007 at 12:24 AM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|