VCDQuality Forums - Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix (2007) *NTSC* - DVDRIP

VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0

VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DVDR > Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix (2007) *NTSC* - DVDRIP - CuriousJotos

Last Thread Next Thread

Author

Thread

X69
Aug 2001

Administrator

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Report this post to a moderator |

10-21-2007 01:25 AM

Click here to Send X69 a Private Message

Extractor
Mar 2002

1

V 7 - quite some compression artefacts visible, rating based on avg bitrate and the fact no extras on the disc (even the menu is still)
A 9
M 7.5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 01:28 AM

Click here to Send Extractor a Private Message

beetlejelly
Aug 2007

Registered

yup, tons of artifacts. flat screen? don't bother.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 02:30 AM

Click here to Send beetlejelly a Private Message

Lagwagon
Apr 2005

Registered

Nice Job
all extras removed
only kept English audio
layer break removed
burns and plays well.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 02:55 AM

koby66
Feb 2007

Member

quote:
Originally posted by Extractor
V 7 - quite some compression artefacts visible, rating based on avg bitrate and the fact no extras on the disc (even the menu is still)
A 9
M 7.5

Get a real TV and DVD player!!!!!
I have 47" and the pic is perfect!!!!!

V-9
A-9
M-7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 03:03 AM

Click here to Send koby66 a Private Message

ricdog266
Jan 2007

Registered

nice very nice good quality voice and image..thanks..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 09:31 AM

Click here to Send ricdog266 a Private Message

wrist
Dec 2004

Senior Member

Whats with that fkn menu. If thats the best Warners could do someone needs a kick up the fkn arse...it fkn blows.

Pic 7ish no better than the R5. A shit load of aliasing.
Sound 10

Lets hope the PAL release is way better.

__________________
It's Not Who I Am Underneath…But What I Do That Defines Me

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 10:56 AM

Click here to Send wrist a Private Message

blobbyrob
Oct 2006

Member

Some of you are fussy fuks

V = 9.5
A = 10
M = 5 Dosen't float my boat

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 01:12 PM

Click here to Send blobbyrob a Private Message

ersatz
Aug 2006

Member

v:6
a:8
m:6

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 06:32 PM

Click here to Send ersatz a Private Message

JohnnyboyD12
Jun 2004

Junior Member

Watching it on My 42" 1080P TV through a HDMI upscaler......

There are defintaly some sort of encoding / quality issues with the releases, looks really bad on my TV.... bitrate canjot be what it is states in the NFO...................

V 7 (looks worse than some R5 I have been getting)
A 10 - how can you get better than 5.1 on a DVD5
f ? Not watched it all yet

Wanting a PROPER, but might might have to wait for the PAL release

JohnnyboyD12

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 06:51 PM

Click here to Send JohnnyboyD12 a Private Message

Filthy_Rich
Apr 2005

Senior Member

this will do for me, for now

V 9
A 9
M 8

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-21-2007 09:29 PM

Click here to Send Filthy_Rich a Private Message

HoldDaSalad
Nov 2002

aka parasiticgannon

No it's not perfect. Not bad though, I lightscribed it because I do plan on buying it, I figure I will keep this release since it's NOT perfect so I can buy it.

Overall 7/9/8

__________________

Hold Da Motha Fuckin Salad.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-22-2007 03:34 AM

Click here to Send HoldDaSalad a Private Message

biggbyte
Mar 2006

Registered

quote:
Originally posted by JohnnyboyD12
Watching it on My 42" 1080P TV through a HDMI upscaler......

There are defintaly some sort of encoding / quality issues with the releases, looks really bad on my TV.... bitrate canjot be what it is states in the NFO.

It looks pretty good from here johnny, maybe your display/hardware needs some calibrating. I also upscaled it to 1080p on a 51" Samsung. Definitely looks much better than the xvid dvdrip and the R5's on my setup. It ain't perfect but it's as good as it gets with 5.1 audio and squeezed on a DVD5. Some visible compression artifacts in the video, but nothing I can't get over. Audio is tight.

The menu is terrible, very amateur looking, but then again it's not an R1 source.

8
9
7 - not the best Harry flick

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-22-2007 04:39 PM

Click here to Send biggbyte a Private Message

JohnnyboyD12
Jun 2004

Junior Member

My system is spot on matey, watched the DVD5 of POTC 3 and that looked awesome on my setup, and that film is longer the this one.

It is just my opinon at the end of the day, but gonna wait for a better release as this one just looks shite.

Also watch 720P xbox360 WMV on my setup and they are really fcuking awesome..... I think this site should start keeping track of those releases, they are the bolloxs 8)

JohnnyboyD12

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-22-2007 09:26 PM

tonysunshine
May 2007

Registered

V-9
A-9
M-7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-23-2007 01:28 AM

Click here to Send tonysunshine a Private Message

ATHiEST
Sep 2007

Banned

quote:
Originally posted by wrist
Whats with that fkn menu. If thats the best Warners could do someone needs a kick up the fkn arse...it fkn blows.

Pic 7ish no better than the R5. A shit load of aliasing.
Sound 10

Lets hope the PAL release is way better.

I totally agree, If this is a real official menu which i very much doubt then it has to be one of the poorest excuses for a R1 retail menu i have ever seen espesially for how high profile the movie is.

To me the menu looks very un-profesional somthing you would get on a simple dvd authoring app, just look at the "Harry Potter" logo it doesnt look in place, I could do better with TMPGEnc DVD author or Nero Vision Express in 10 minutes so i hate to think how long it took these guys to come up with this

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-24-2007 06:22 AM

Click here to Send ATHiEST a Private Message

ILM
May 2006

Junior Member

the menu looks like a rental R4

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-24-2007 04:06 PM

Click here to Send ILM a Private Message

OSH
Sep 2006

WHO IS JOHN GALT?
*Smashes seal skull*

Nothing wrong with the video as far as I can see, maybe a little grainy, but that's it.

V-8.5
A-9
M-?

Edit: What a menu, sheesh.

__________________

I'm gay. <3 <3 <3

Last edited by OSH on 10-25-2007 at 08:38 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-25-2007 03:03 AM

Click here to Send OSH a Private Message

Big
May 2002

Junior Member

Maybe my perception has been altered since getting into HD but this release looks like garbage; all sorts of pixelization and wavering issues. Scenes with not much movement are ok but if things get moving in a particular scene it all goes to shit. Can't decide if it's low-quality to begin with, a piss-poor encode or both.

V = 7.5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10-31-2007 05:43 AM