Scarfacejosh
Mar 2008
Junior Member
|
quote: Originally posted by cookiemaster
waste of a release... Same source as mvs, they just mad they got beat by 6minutes on release. Give some real proof.. ANYONE can make a "raw" sample..
v- 0 mvs was acceptable and no tech flaws
a- 0 mvs was acceptable and no tech flaws
m -watching tonight
NOPE!
apparently TUBE were right.
There was already a crappy screener by RUBNER, it's 960MB, encoded with DIVX codec, with a frame size of 720x480.
It is full of shitframes! I started downloading the mVs release and previewed it. It's XviD this time, smaller frame size, but guess what... same shitframes as can be found with RUBNER release!
Just look at:
0:02:07
0:05:29
0:06:37
0:07:02
and many, many more! It's getting NUKED!
I'm downloading the TUBE release right now. Previewed it and it's clean.
On their nfo they say that mVs stole from a 900mb version that floats around, while they have the actual silver, I think we can believe TUBE on this one.
__________________
Jsmailes
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|