VCDQuality Forums - Righteous Kill R5 *XViD* - R5

VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0

VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DIVX > Righteous Kill R5 *XViD* - R5 - PUKKA

Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Last Thread Next Thread

Author

Thread

X69
Aug 2001

Administrator

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Report this post to a moderator |

09-25-2008 05:02 AM

Click here to Send X69 a Private Message

ReTiCuLeX
Jan 2003

Junior Member

Pukka <3

V: 9
A: 8
M: ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 06:02 AM

Click here to Send ReTiCuLeX a Private Message

Sysyphus
Nov 2005

Member

You can always count of Pukka for an amazing R5!

Video: Video looks spot on, of course.
Audio: In sync and direct, once again it's spot on.
Movie: Haven't finished watching it, but these two power house actors in one movie is just awesome.

V:9
A:9
M:?

__________________
The show must go on...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 06:17 AM

Click here to Send Sysyphus a Private Message

fireman911
Nov 2006

Senior Member

V:9
A:9

Thx puk! you rocks again

__________________
i shall burn it...(onto a dvd :P )

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 07:00 AM

Click here to Send fireman911 a Private Message

Qumahlin
Mar 2003

Junior Member

Pretty sure the Arrow dvdrip was out before this, or is this just a pukka rip and re-release "Scene" style

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 07:13 AM

Click here to Send Qumahlin a Private Message

vcdslut
Jul 2007

Member

V:9
A:9
M:7

seems that audio channels are different but not mono or out of phase

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 07:37 AM

Click here to Send vcdslut a Private Message

Monkey39
Mar 2005

Couch Potato

Skimmed through flick .. looks great .. thanks pukka

A=9
V=9
M=?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 07:47 AM

Click here to Send Monkey39 a Private Message

danimal39
Jul 2004

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

9/9/7 nice

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 08:46 AM

Click here to Send danimal39 a Private Message

ikghassassin
Oct 2005

Member

great quality

v:9
a:9
m: 8 actually saw this in theaters, nice twists, good suspense, overall pretty good.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 09:12 AM

OSH
Sep 2006

WHO IS JOHN GALT?
*Smashes seal skull*

What a pretty release, and 13 days after hitting U.S. cinemas.

V-9
A-?
M-?

__________________

I'm gay. <3 <3 <3

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 09:58 AM

Click here to Send OSH a Private Message

misfits138
Mar 2002

Member

V: 9
A: 9
M: 7 Took a point off because the ending is just too predictable. I knew the "twist" by just watching the trailer.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 10:27 AM

Click here to Send misfits138 a Private Message

OSH
Sep 2006

WHO IS JOHN GALT?
*Smashes seal skull*

Some people are saying things like, "Wait for a proper. The aspect ratio of this release is wrong. It's supposed to be 2.35:1, not 1.85:1." and in response to that, "Shot in Super 35, so any ratio from 2.4:1, 1.85:1 and 4:3 are all "correct".

__________________

I'm gay. <3 <3 <3

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 11:43 AM

13atez
Sep 2008

Newbie

V: 9 (Typical R5).

A: 9 (Crisp/Clear).

M: 8 (Good performances from both De Niro and Pacino).

Yet again, another great rls from Pukka, and so quick too! Thnx man!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 12:49 PM

Click here to Send 13atez a Private Message

TR0JAN
Jul 2007

WHUFC ICF ELITE

Hoho, you guys & your ratio's - oo, what are you like?!
Very nice release:

V9
A8
M7

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 05:26 PM

Click here to Send TR0JAN a Private Message

DaMoneyFan
Feb 2007

Member

Don't give a shit what anyone says...this is great fucking rls!!! Props to Pukka!!! THANK YOU!

Video - 10
AUdio - 10
Movie - 8

Well worth the wait on this one....

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 06:09 PM

corniche
Feb 2006

Member

quote:
Originally posted by Objectivist Seal Hunter
Some people are saying things like, "Wait for a proper. The aspect ratio of this release is wrong. It's supposed to be 2.35:1, not 1.85:1." and in response to that, "Shot in Super 35, so any ratio from 2.4:1, 1.85:1 and 4:3 are all "correct".

Can you explain that please? I understand super35, but unless the 4:3 you mention happens to have HUGE black bars top and bottom, there is no way your comment can be correct. But yes, many 16:9 releases are simply unmatted copies of the 2:35 WS release.

No offense, but I think you are confusing the FILM's aspect ratio with the ripped avi's aspect ratio, which can include letterbox bars or sidepost bars.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 07:07 PM

Click here to Send corniche a Private Message

Rounder98
Sep 2005

Senior Member

I saw this in the theatre when it came out, Got this release for the parents and all I have to say is what a great release so fast. I have always been a PUKKA fan, releases like this make it hard not to be

Video - 9 , ratio looks fine to me on the wide screen monitor

Audio - 9 on my shitty computer speakers, appears to be all in sync

Movie - 7 two of the best actors still alive, need I say more, unfortunately it was pretty predictable but most all movies of this genre are. Don't get me wrong it was enjoyable to watch its Def worth a watch

__________________
Arguing with a liberal is like arguing with an idiot, they lower you to their level and beat you with experience.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 07:38 PM

Click here to Send Rounder98 a Private Message

OSH
Sep 2006

WHO IS JOHN GALT?
*Smashes seal skull*

quote:
Originally posted by corniche
Can you explain that please? I understand super35, but unless the 4:3 you mention happens to have HUGE black bars top and bottom, there is no way your comment can be correct. But yes, many 16:9 releases are simply unmatted copies of the 2:35 WS release.

No offense, but I think you are confusing the FILM's aspect ratio with the ripped avi's aspect ratio, which can include letterbox bars or sidepost bars.

I didn't come up with that absurd stuff, other people from other sites did. I think what they had to say is ridiculous.

__________________

I'm gay. <3 <3 <3

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 08:48 PM

corniche
Feb 2006

Member

quote:
Originally posted by Objectivist Seal Hunter
I didn't come up with that absurd stuff, other people from other sites did. I think what they had to say is ridiculous.

Sorry, I misread your meaning. Yes, it is quite absurd, and many people have no idea of the difference between CROPPED aspect ratio and simply WRONG aspect ratio (ie: skinnied, fattied, squashed, etc.) See, for example, another post on this page.

Which still leaves open the question: Has this release been cropped, or is it simply unmatted???? You never can tell with these R5's or 16:9 screeners of movies that claim a 2:35 WS theatre ratio. And it can get even more interesting. Mongol, for example, was released in a 16:9 R5 and a 2.35:1 retail. When I compared them, I found that the 16:9 was slightly side cropped, but unmatted for most of its vertical size. So you got MORE on the top and bottom, and LESS on the sides.

Last edited by corniche on 09-25-2008 at 09:17 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-2008 09:07 PM

Redemption198
Jul 2004

Senior Member

Great release of a film i actually wanted to see.

9/8/?

quote:
Some people are saying things like, "Wait for a proper. The aspect ratio of this release is wrong. It's supposed to be 2.35:1, not 1.85:1." and in response to that, "Shot in Super 35, so any ratio from 2.4:1, 1.85:1 and 4:3 are all "correct".

Both points are true.
Super35 started getting used so Widescreen stuff could be shown on a 4:3 and 16:9 TV's with no bars and little to no side cropping, as S35 has an AR of 1.65:1, the 4:3 and 1:78 versions have less cropping than the 2:4:1 versions.
Saw the same thing with R4 Rambo a few months back.

Anyway, enough geekiness, again nice release