VCDQuality Forums - 3 10 To Yuma *PROPER* *R5* *XviD* - R5

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 29 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- 3 10 To Yuma *PROPER* *R5* *XviD* - R5 - ASTEROiDS (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=78754)

Posted by X69 on 10-11-2007 02:04 AM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Posted by j0zj0z on 10-11-2007 02:05 AM:

[NUKE] [ 3.10.To.Yuma.PROPER.R5.LiNE.XviD-ASTEROiDS ] [ invalid.proper_both.cds.undersized_packed.bitstream.not.forbidden_qualitative.should.be.internal]

Posted by s01o on 10-11-2007 02:38 AM:

I don't care if it's nuked I've missed ASTEROiDS.

Great quality as usual.

V/9
A/9
M/?

Welcome back.

Posted by Bhart on 10-11-2007 03:26 AM:

much better than Pukka

V: 9
A: 10
M: 9

...what a stupid reason to be nuked....

Posted by X400 on 10-11-2007 05:54 AM:

bah shoulda held out on getting pukka

8/8/?

Posted by vcdslut on 10-11-2007 06:34 AM:

first poster was right this is nuked everywhere for unneeded qualitative proper.
tdx rules clearly allow for 116min runtime on a one cd release with a 128bit mp3.
as the others say, 2cd is spam and creditwhoring it adds nothing to the quality

V:9
A:6
M:8 was a damn fine persentation
PUKKA rls was fine, asteroids expected better from a comeback rls than this garbage

Posted by CATBOX on 10-11-2007 02:18 PM:

A well deserved proper

I don't know if anyone who posted here actually compared this to Pukka's release, but its a big improvement. Video bitrate is higher, and the sound on this release is 100x better than Pukka's. Pukka's had a horrible hiss to the audio the entire time that occassionally crackled. Asteroids release is clean with no static at all, and nice bass response.

I can see where this could be nuked for undersized discs, but thats just for following a technical scene rule. As for being an "invalid proper" i disagree. Thanks for this much improved release Asteriods!

V - 9
A - 9
M - 7

CATBOX

Posted by bi0h4zard on 10-11-2007 04:39 PM:

V:9
A:9
V:?
Audio is better than Pukka Release.

Posted by ATHiEST on 10-11-2007 05:13 PM:

Re: A well deserved proper

quote:
Originally posted by CATBOX
I don't know if anyone who posted here actually compared this to Pukka's release, but its a big improvement. Video bitrate is higher, and the sound on this release is 100x better than Pukka's. Pukka's had a horrible hiss to the audio the entire time that occassionally crackled. Asteroids release is clean with no static at all, and nice bass response.

I can see where this could be nuked for undersized discs, but thats just for following a technical scene rule. As for being an "invalid proper" i disagree. Thanks for this much improved release Asteriods!

V - 9
A - 9
M - 7

CATBOX

Well if you disagree then you dont really understand.

Its a invalid proper because of the reason they gave, If they had give bad audio as the reason then it would have been valid, but they gave 2 incorrect rule breaks as reasons for proper so it got nuked.

The scene nuke aside asteroids release is allot better quality wise then pukkas due to good audio and higher bitrate video

Posted by vcdslut on 10-11-2007 05:26 PM:

CATBOX

you are complaining that it sounds better which don't matter if first rls is fine and real line, pukka won and all reasons in asteroids nfo for reason for proper are bs (yes that's why scene/forum and dupe nukes everywhere) the grp you are supporting doesn't even agree with you they know the audio isn't bad enough to be properable on the 1st rls

Posted by Ekno on 10-11-2007 06:49 PM:

AND THE CONCLUSION IS:
grab this rather than PUKKA's release, ASTEROiDS release has better quality.

Posted by CATBOX on 10-11-2007 07:29 PM:

Thanks for the replies directly to my comments. I don't want to spam the forum, so this will be my last post in this thread.

Please read the NFO file before making comments that aren't true. Asteroids states THREE reasons for the proper.

"Pukka release has (1)packed bitstream, (2)bad audio and (3)should have been 2 CDs."

I only said i disagreed with the nuke because it is a well deserved proper. I understand that its undersized, but other than that the quality is better than PUKKA all the way around.

CATBOX

I think Ekno's comments sum it up well. :-)

Posted by split710 on 10-11-2007 08:50 PM:

ehehe

audio of this release is STEALED (as usual for lamers asteroids) from GENUiNE Telesync release, audio is exactly the same, asteroids are more stupids of what all says, they haven't equalized, exactly same graphic at 100% with all most important editing audio programs, some defect also. same not normal rumors.

PUKKA release is OK.

packet bitstrem is prefered to don't use but allowed NO VALID REASON FOR PROPER
PUKKA audio has no problems NO PROPER QUALITATIVE ARE ALLLOWED
2 CD are not valid proper reason

what's this proper considering stealed audio and banned group (for stealing)?

Posted by gezzer on 10-11-2007 10:35 PM:

Great release, nice to see asteroids back ,dont give shit about all the bullshit ,9/9/8

Posted by ATHiEST on 10-11-2007 10:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by CATBOX
Thanks for the replies directly to my comments. I don't want to spam the forum, so this will be my last post in this thread.

Please read the NFO file before making comments that aren't true. Asteroids states THREE reasons for the proper.

"Pukka release has (1)packed bitstream, (2)bad audio and (3)should have been 2 CDs."

I only said i disagreed with the nuke because it is a well deserved proper. I understand that its undersized, but other than that the quality is better than PUKKA all the way around.

CATBOX

I think Ekno's comments sum it up well. :-)

Yes and thats the whole point, you cant proper a release because of quality reasons, Only if the original release is broken or breaks a scene rule. So its you who should do some reading before commenting.

This should have just been tagged internal not proper.

[EDIT] In response to the below comment: Nobody is saying that this isnt the best, it is the best quality. What is been said is regards to the scene nuke status.

Posted by RipBlippley on 10-12-2007 12:14 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by gezzer
Great release, nice to see asteroids back ,dont give shit about all the bullshit ,9/9/8

I agree. I could care less about the bullshit... I just download and watch what's best. This one's the best.

v9
a8
m9 (It's no Unforgiven, but still a pretty good western)

__________________
Why pay?

Posted by Tork on 10-12-2007 03:45 AM:

V: 8.999
A: 8.899
M: ?

Posted by DexterGr on 10-12-2007 06:17 AM:

It seems to me that the problem is the "proper" tag in the title? What I'm trying to say is that, if ASTEROiDS didn't post that release as a "proper", it wouldn't be nuked right?

Posted by eboskie1 on 10-12-2007 08:08 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by DexterGr
It seems to me that the problem is the "proper" tag in the title? What I'm trying to say is that, if ASTEROiDS didn't post that release as a "proper", it wouldn't be nuked right?

I believe it would have been nuked anyways as a DUPE so there arent doubles of the same thing ie two R5s, there has to be a reason to release a video on the scene that someone else has already released. They could have releaesed it as an internal which cant be nuked.

Posted by Cr-critic on 10-12-2007 09:58 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by DexterGr
It seems to me that the problem is the "proper" tag in the title? What I'm trying to say is that, if ASTEROiDS didn't post that release as a "proper", it wouldn't be nuked right?

naw its called invalid proper because the pukka wasn't nuked [ a nuke is required before a PROPER is allowed] although pukka has poor audio [on computer] R5 can have perfect Video and even have the shittiest cam audio[as the R5 had russian audio so they used a different audio source] and it won't get nuked.....so asteroids did everyone a favor they made 2 cd's because max decent video is 105 minutes per cd and this movie is closer to 120 also they used a superior audio source.......so yea its nuked and yes its a far better release.......... funny eh lol [ Asteroids could have done an internal release instead of proper to avoid the nuke ]

3:10.To.Yuma.Internal.R5.XviD.ASTEROiDS

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:04 AM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 29 posts from this thread on one page