VCDQuality Forums - Star Trek Nemesis *ReadNFO* - TELESYNC

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Star Trek Nemesis *ReadNFO* - TELESYNC - XV (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=13203)

Posted by alundrety on 01-05-2003 07:45 PM:

i hate people who rate by picture

i got the sample and it looks only a little bit better then the ftf, better color but the picture is kinda out of focus as if it is a auto focused cam...

the sound is of a cam and not of a auz hookup(ts)

whatever

__________________
ehhhhh

Posted by Natural on 01-05-2003 08:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ScabbyDoo

they are not stating proper reasons because they didnt lable is as a proper

it's implied. there is no other reason for their read-nfo, other than to explain why it's better than the other ts'

Posted by Natural on 01-05-2003 08:12 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by backoff
I think this movie sucked really bad, so if you REALLY REALLY like stupid fucking Star Trek maybe you will like this, but I fell asleep when I went to see it in the theatres.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!

yes, i will certainly heed your "unbiased" opinion. since you obviously hate st, then why did you go see it. furthermore, why even bother stating your opinion since no matter how good the movie was, it would still be negative. your post is useless

Posted by cofferscuffs on 01-05-2003 09:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr_Grinch

Maybe it was Cam'd, recorded to vhs and then converted to mpg.

Anyway, I didn't like this film much but judging by the sample it looks like the best release yet. As someone said though, sample's can be missleading.

ok ok non-dv cam then.... but look closely it does look like its been cammed with a non-dv cam

__________________
cC.

Posted by Serpentor on 01-05-2003 11:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Natural

it's implied. there is no other reason for their read-nfo, other than to explain why it's better than the other ts'

Implied Natural, or implode?

Posted by Natural on 01-06-2003 06:46 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Serpentor

Implied Natural, or implode?

if there's a punchline to that, i missed it. what does implode have to do with anything?

Posted by vcd fogie on 01-06-2003 06:57 AM:

why are you fools arguing about polotics? WHO CARES WHAT THE DAMN TAG IN THE RLS NAME IS??!?! maybe some anal jerkass nuker cares, but nobody else does. they just like quality releases. they're not gonna care whether someone put readnfo or proper.

i just checked the sample. great silver XV... the colors are almost perfect, it's much crisper than most telesyncs, there's no bleeding, and the sound is audible although a bit "tinny." thanks XV, i'll be downloading this for sure. and anything is better than an ftf cam. thanks!

8/7/haven't watched movie yet

__________________
retired from the scene, but still leechin!

Posted by Kazmir on 01-06-2003 09:15 PM:

Re: voting privileges

quote:
Originally posted by strawhair
maybe we should only be allowed to vote between 2/2/2 and 9/9/9 because i havent done all 10's or all 1's but allegedly i have done this and have been banned from voting?.
could somebody explain to me what is the point of having the out of 10 voting system if we are not allowed to vote for some releases how we see fit-it kind of renders the whole thing pointless?.
i await the usual mature replies
however- 3/4/3

Errm... you can still vote 1/1/5, the release sucks but the movie is average. 1/1/1 is an ubershitty release of an ubershitty movie, which is pretty unlikely to happen, ever. If you vote 1/1/1, you probably don't have a clue and do it just to dump on a group, so that's forbidden.

__________________
-- Kaz

Posted by Norco01 on 01-06-2003 11:43 PM:

Ya this release sucks pretty bad. Don't bother.

Posted by Twista on 01-07-2003 03:40 PM:

::::::The source is from a cam cuz there's peoples head in front of the screen during the movie.. On the 1st and second cd's, the last 20 minutes, the audio went out of sync and the video kept screwing....... I rate this 4/4/9::::::::::

(b) This makes sense to take time viewing what people take for granted.......

Posted by Jesus H Christ on 01-09-2003 12:13 AM:

The whole thing is messed up - shame, cos went to see this in the Cinema and it's rather good.

Posted by Natural on 01-09-2003 04:35 AM:

for the record it also has the same audio gaps that the ftf version had. well not gaps really, more like missing sfx...

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 AM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page