VCDQuality Forums
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Bringing Down The House - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=17590)


Posted by PRiNT on 04-07-2003 09:54 PM:

[NUKE] :: sub.par.video.quality


Posted by j0h2n on 04-07-2003 09:56 PM:

Video looks awful .


Posted by dvdude on 04-07-2003 09:56 PM:

well.. looks good 4 me.. i would give it 7.5/7.5/x.x


Posted by LiQuIdMuNkY on 04-07-2003 10:01 PM:

I wouldnt say "awful" its a little blurry and pixelated, but pretty good, im gonna watch with anyway, sound is always good fro a scr and is in this case, ugly watermark, but that aint nothing!

7/9/?

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?


Posted by dvdude on 04-07-2003 10:04 PM:

if ppl bitch about watermarks and blur.. i would say.. buy the retail dvd or watch it at cinema..:>


Posted by Bullet on 04-07-2003 10:05 PM:

just watched the sample..not great qual but decent enough to watch

7,5/8/?


Posted by Rep- on 04-07-2003 10:05 PM:

ZaeroNIX
10 9 9

Are you sure you watched the right sample? The video is blurry and has a counter and a watermark. A 10? more like a 7 for video.


Posted by flex0r on 04-07-2003 10:09 PM:

Cool not too good ;(

well i watched the sample and this isnt any great stuff at all, blurs on the left, counter on the upper right and big text mark on the bottom, not really sharp picture, well well its maybe watchable for some but not that good for a screener, still big thnx for the release, keep it up

6/7/?


Posted by dvdude on 04-07-2003 10:14 PM:

BLURS on the left = coverd serials..


Posted by j0h2n on 04-07-2003 10:21 PM:

Yep, the video is awful, and now its nuked to..

lol


Posted by dvdude on 04-07-2003 10:21 PM:

:: Another TS mislabled to SCreener from VideoCD ::

realized:

i dont think u watched right sample.. heh.. since when did TS had fat watermarks..? this u have to realize what u are talking about before u open your mounth..


Posted by Cable Boy on 04-07-2003 10:26 PM:

hmm this wasnt nuked on any of my sites, the quality is quite nice, the tcf version was better i think...

7/8/8


Posted by opso on 04-07-2003 10:30 PM:

grainy motion movement the ts was better then the screener.


Posted by your name her on 04-07-2003 10:38 PM:

the video is not good cuz of all the watermarks
audio is not so good ether
movie has its funny parts

6/7/7

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by BuFu on 04-08-2003 12:44 AM:

This is not the quality ya expect from a screener. video quality looks more like a TS to me then a screener, audio aint that bad, not great either.
5/5/?
better luck next time


Posted by SeeDee on 04-08-2003 01:11 AM:

6/7/7


Posted by pHo on 04-08-2003 01:20 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by B16A2
If dog shit was free, I'd still complain about it.


you pay for dog shit? thats fucked up dude

as for this thread, its gonna have to get a cleanup due to the usual bullshit between people, so expect posts to disappear.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by kalvaitis007 on 04-08-2003 05:02 AM:

This message will self-destruct

Cleanup finished. Listen up people, if you start talking about which users are in what group, TRUE OR NOT, I will ban you with the quickness.

-K


Posted by hadu on 04-08-2003 09:21 PM:

quality is ok but the movie is garbage.. sound is okay too...

this movie blows big time..

the property thing is mad annoying!!


Posted by spazmeat on 04-11-2003 10:26 AM:

Talking my vote!

i give it a 5/7/3!
it is watchible but not the best in quality
good rls

__________________
~morning glory dreams~


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 AM.
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.