VCDQuality Forums - The Banger Sisters - SCREENER

Show all 26 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Banger Sisters - SCREENER - TCF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=10631)

Posted by MovieDude735 on 11-06-2002 02:45 AM:

This is another excellent screener from TCF. The timer is a bit annoying but you don't notice it after awhile. The release is over all very good quality and the audio is more than decent. Thanks for an awesome copy of this movie TCF.

Posted by DarkBeatz on 11-06-2002 02:58 AM:

Just checked sample and again a nice tcf screener, altho I like their FS screeners better

Sound is nice, very clear and loud, and video is slightly blurry, usual serials at the bottom blurred out nicely off course

Keep it up

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-06-2002 03:03 AM:

man just me or is it odd this and the transporter have EXACTLY the same counter? hmm fishy not even the same move releaers do it the same to easy to make presets

Posted by AgGz on 11-06-2002 03:10 AM:

fishy? lol

lol how can it be fishy, mabey it has the same counter cuz its from the same source. Why would any group want to add a counter to a release that would be the stupidest thing in the world, they blured out the one next to it so why would they add in a additional one...hmmm thats fishy lol

besides that this is a good rip just grabbed the sample
7.5/7.5

Posted by your name here on 11-06-2002 03:36 AM:

damm tcf is just tearing shit up with all these screeners i have to admit i also like the fs screeners better too but tcf keep these awesome screeners coming

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by OzZyOz on 11-06-2002 03:39 AM:

I dunno is it me or does this and the Transporter look good but look like modified TC's with timers slapped on them I dunno. /me gets ready for flaming war! o well my opinion but nice quality at that 7.5/8/6

Posted by typhoon on 11-06-2002 03:40 AM:

Fire_Sokar i cant tell from the jpg if it says FOX in the corner like the transporter one did but maybe they got both the screeners from fox. check out the sample of this and it might be your answer =]

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-06-2002 04:45 AM:

Re: fishy? lol

quote:
Originally posted by AgGz
, they blured out the one next to it so why would they add in a additional one...hmmm thats fishy lol

7.5/7.5

You know that makes no sense. They blurred one out but not the other.. Look at the digital artifacts on the serial number... ok,1 maybe its original and im over critisizing... but several tcf releases with almost identical counters.. odd... And most scr are not ws they are usually fs or letterbox... this is an odd combination faded picture, serial, ws, hmm looks a lil tc to me

Posted by KaMa on 11-06-2002 04:46 AM:

Lmao

good Quality i Have to Say... TCF

But the MOvie was Gay Gay Gay....

should oif let rsp have this one . Lmao

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-06-2002 04:47 AM:

also see swim fan scr same counter and location... not usuall fox usually is fs screeners btw

Posted by KaMa on 11-06-2002 04:49 AM:

FIre soker

Fire soker from #TMD .... Kama aka Blue

Posted by HATINonHATAS on 11-06-2002 04:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz
I dunno is it me or does this and the Transporter look good but look like modified TC's with timers slapped on them I dunno. /me gets ready for flaming war! o well my opinion but nice quality at that 7.5/8/6

I agree these SCR (Swimfan, Transporter, Banger Sisters) look like the same quality as VideoCD's TCs. I guess most of us expect true SCRs to be FS without timers or property marks. If labelling realy bugs the shit out of some people (I could care less, only the groups and thier suppliers know wtf they're rlsing) maybe the VCD scene should make some kind of specs for what qualifies a rls to be a true SCR.

This way we'll stop clogging up the rls forums with arguments and debates bout labelling, and fill them with comments on the quality of the rls.

Posted by pHo on 11-06-2002 04:58 AM:

Re: Re: fishy? lol

quote:
Originally posted by Fire_Sokar

And most scr are not ws they are usually fs or letterbox...

err letterbox IS widescreen (in the non-anamorphic sense anyway)

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-06-2002 05:09 AM:

Re: Re: Re: fishy? lol

quote:
Originally posted by pHo

err letterbox IS widescreen (in the non-anamorphic sense anyway)

ty for your correction pHo... I got mixed up. But still as I stated earlier it does look like tc... austin powers... etc etc the counter is oddly the same and yes kama it is me...

Posted by blacks on 11-06-2002 05:36 AM:

Actually, how does TC look?
I mean, does it mean that because its WS with serials, it has to be TC?

I dont really understand how a TC should be. Is there a way to tell them apart purely from a technical point of view?

Well, I know a CAM from a TS because of the difference in direct sound. I know the difference between a TS and a SCR because of the video and sound quality(obviously). But as for TCs and SCRs, the quality seems to be the same. Or am I missing something out.

Posted by Mystic Slippers on 11-06-2002 12:15 PM:

Looks nice enough. Sounds nice enough, but for me i'll stick with my workprint copy until a DVD version arrives. Nice stuff yet again though.

Oh, and this movie is pretty good too.

7/7/7

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-06-2002 07:28 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by blacks
Actually, how does TC look?
I mean, does it mean that because its WS with serials, it has to be TC?

I dont really understand how a TC should be. Is there a way to tell them apart purely from a technical point of view?

Well, I know a CAM from a TS because of the difference in direct sound. I know the difference between a TS and a SCR because of the video and sound quality(obviously). But as for TCs and SCRs, the quality seems to be the same. Or am I missing something out.

Well N00b it appears that you did not notice pHo and x69's news column on the website here click on it it has a .php referal to what a tc is.. shortly a tc is an unexact copy of the reel from the source at a movie theater instead of a professional copy. Ways of this are wetgate. A tc if done right can look as good as a screener these however seem to be done with the contrast up to high. These groups should add some kind of filter to edit it this is way to washed out to be a scr. I have seen a better cam then this. literally dr do lil2 was a decent cam in imho

LOL sorry bout that was at school and was in a hurry. chick next to me had a thong was distracted.

Posted by pHo on 11-06-2002 07:58 PM:

x86 lol , dont think he'll be too happy bout that.

and a TC done on very expensive equipment will look a lot better than a SCR imo.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by nokia on 11-06-2002 11:23 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Fire_Sokar
...is it odd this and the transporter have EXACTLY the same counter? hmm fishy not even the same move releaers do it the same to easy to make presets

They probably do have the exact same counter and watermarks but so does all of MGM dvd screeners such as Barbershop, Croc Hunter, Windtalker, Deuces Wild, No Such Thing, Harts War, etc. What does that prove? Nothing, just that studio's DO use the same formats for their screeners so maybe these are fox studio vhs screeners since the studio doesn't produce dvd screeners.

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz
...look like modified TC's with timers slapped on them...

If you're familiar with video editing, you'd know it's quite difficult to add overlaying watermarks (such as counters and serials). Also why would they go through the trouble of adding counters and serials just to blur them out again?!? Not only is that stupid but I don't think release group have the time to fiddle with such things since they're always in a rush to get it out first (imo anyways).

quote:
Originally posted by Fire_Sokar
...And most scr are not ws they are usually fs or letterbox... this is an odd combination faded picture, serial, ws, hmm looks a lil tc...

Most retail screeners yes, but many studio screeners are WS. Telecines usually have BETTER colors than screeners, check out TCF's Minority Report or earlier TC's like Jurassic Park 3. It's rare for TC's to have serials (but not watermarks) although counters are common. Also for a sample of a Wetgate transfer download Dragonfly by SiD, you'll see the difference between a wetgate release and these.

Sorry for the babble, I just love to research :P

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-06-2002 11:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by nokia
If you're familiar with video editing, you'd know it's quite difficult to add overlaying watermarks (such as counters and serials).

Well acutally I am quite familiar with it. And no its not difficult I can add a counter to a movie with 3 clicks lol not that hard takes 10 minutes to process the entire film.

Posted by nokia on 11-06-2002 11:50 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Fire_Sokar

Well acutally I am quite familiar with it. And no its not difficult I can add a counter to a movie with 3 clicks lol not that hard takes 10 minutes to process the entire film.

So you're saying a group would capture a release "watermark-free"... frameserve to add a counter, 2 serials, and a transparent fox watermark THEN blur the serials out again? ROFL, silly rabbit... tricks are for kids. Let me reword my earlier post, even for someone familiar with video editing... it'll be a hassle, time consuming, and worthless (3 clicks? what about positioning, transparency, etc... I think you'll need to use the keypad eventually

, and 10 minutes? you must have miracle software)

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-07-2002 12:47 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nokia
So you're saying a group would capture a release "watermark-free"... frameserve to add a counter, 2 serials, and a transparent fox watermark THEN blur the serials out again? ROFL, silly rabbit... tricks are for kids. Let me reword my earlier post, even for someone familiar with video editing... it'll be a hassle, time consuming, and worthless (3 clicks? what about positioning, transparency, etc... I think you'll need to use the keypad eventually , and 10 minutes? you must have miracle software)

nope 10 minutes in vdub ass. and the positioning?? well simply its in the samee xact spot as all there other fucking releases so maby just maybe they have a preset? click and load??? stupid leprachan i got your lucky charms now bitch squeel like a pig

Posted by nokia on 11-07-2002 12:55 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Fire_Sokar

nope 10 minutes in vdub ass. and the positioning?? well simply its in the samee xact spot as all there other fucking releases so maby just maybe they have a preset? click and load??? stupid leprachan i got your lucky charms now bitch squeel like a pig

Still the point is, why add those watermarks if you got a clean source? exactly, there is no point... oink oink

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-08-2002 12:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nokia
Still the point is, why add those watermarks if you got a clean source? exactly, there is no point... oink oink

Many groups go to extents to fake releases. A scr is considered a better gain than tc in some eyes. so if you have the means and the need youll do what you have to do.

Posted by dank! on 11-08-2002 03:06 PM:

fire_sokar, you done trying to kill your self? good to see you out and about....#tmd again eh? thought you grew up....hahahahaha

as for the movie, its nearly the exact same as swimfan and transporter for quality....and yea the fox logo is there

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-08-2002 10:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dank!
fire_sokar, you done trying to kill your self? good to see you out and about....#tmd again eh? thought you grew up....hahahahaha

as for the movie, its nearly the exact same as swimfan and transporter for quality....and yea the fox logo is there

Dank the wankers sup man where you been? email me

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 AM.

Show all 26 posts from this thread on one page