VCDQuality Forums
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- S W A T *SVCD* *NUKED NOT SWAT* - SCREENER - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=30263)


Posted by psyche on 10-28-2003 01:52 PM:

S W A T - SCREENER - Centropy

Source is good but I think it would have been just as good if encoded as VCD. The quality is on par with TCF's VHS Screeners and you can kind of see a vhs type noise overlaying the image which isn't apparent in other VHS SVCD Screeners like ViPER's Freddy Vs. Jason. Sound is good though, gj CTP. 7/9/8


Posted by Mystic Slippers on 10-28-2003 02:35 PM:

I hope this doesn't become some new found thing. If you don't want to use VCD, then use CVD, specially made for VHS sources. SVCD for VHS is a waste. Kill Bill SVCD was an exception as it was gorgeous.


Posted by koldphuzion on 10-28-2003 03:11 PM:

if this has been nuked for not being SWAT, WTf is it? is it still a decent enough movie to grab lol. i wouldnt expect a group like CTP to screw up like this.


Posted by X400 on 10-28-2003 03:18 PM:

i havent taken a look myself, but i notice it says its nuked cuz its not swat?


Posted by Avenger on 10-28-2003 03:28 PM:

swat is definetly not packaged inside


Posted by firefighter on 10-28-2003 03:33 PM:

yup , didnt download it myself but seen Nuked : Reason - Both CD's are CD1 , STV , Actually the movie "together". Shit Happens .

ermm also heard it might be - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0332639/ . Either or , Still not S.W.A.T

Personally didnt download it , Just Seen alot of Nukes

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by Nusphere on 10-28-2003 04:58 PM:

ha

to be honest i don't think it was centropy that rls'd this at all. i think it's someone being stupid and trying to make centropy look like crap..

7/7/8 (whatever this movie is, its pretty good)


Posted by pHo on 10-28-2003 05:02 PM:

wow lets all point at psyche for looking like a dumbass kids.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by peevuto on 10-28-2003 05:17 PM:

Yeah Psyche and Mystic Slippers should watch the "package" before commenting. Your right, they both look like dumbass kids who like to post first, even if its nonsense.

::edit- you mean like this post? -M$


Posted by Jerry Aldini on 10-28-2003 05:31 PM:

So what movie is the JPG from?


Posted by makeme on 10-28-2003 06:53 PM:

rofl psyche and yeh M$ didnt post anything about the "sample"


Posted by Jerry Aldini on 10-28-2003 07:47 PM:

I'm sure there's a reasonable explanation


Posted by rappa on 10-28-2003 08:44 PM:

the sample is swat and it looks fine, ms owns u all neway so his post and psyche's both were legible. They probably just mispackaged the wrong mpg and got it all fuxored up or something...for the one person who said tcr is better then ctp, just cuz ctp hasnt rlsed a ts in a while, don't mean they r better. CTP has been putting out quality rips longer then you have even heard about vcdquality so just stop talking..sample is good 8/8/6 and the movie is iffy..waiting for a repack.

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by psyche on 10-28-2003 08:55 PM:

silly rabbits, tricks are for kids


Posted by commiewhore on 10-28-2003 09:11 PM:

Re: S W A T - SCREENER - Centropy

quote:
Originally posted by psyche
Source is good but I think it would have been just as good if encoded as VCD. The quality is on par with TCF's VHS Screeners and you can kind of see a vhs type noise overlaying the image which isn't apparent in other VHS SVCD Screeners like ViPER's Freddy Vs. Jason. Sound is good though, gj CTP. 7/9/8



the best part is you made this whole judgement, on a movie that isnt the right movie....man, thats fucking funny, nice job senor


Posted by kevlar on 10-28-2003 09:16 PM:

the sample pic on vcdq isnt swat, but i just dled and unrared the actual files and it is s.w.a.t. i would rate the vid an 8 sound an 8 movie a 9 good job centropy vcdq you need to update your pic, it is the real deal


Posted by psyche on 10-28-2003 09:24 PM:

Re: Re: S W A T - SCREENER - Centropy

quote:
Originally posted by commiewhore
the best part is you made this whole judgement, on a movie that isnt the right movie....man, thats fucking funny, nice job senor
check out the sample dir (not the sample jpeg) before you mouth off... or read rappa's post. how many idiots do we have on this forum, you guys are just making yourselves look like jackasses.


Posted by pHo on 10-28-2003 09:40 PM:

yes , and judging by a sample really tells you if the movies correct doesn't it. judging by samples = lame way to get on the forum first if you ask me.

oh and i didn't delete your post if you were wondering, but i saw it. you pointed out the wrong grammatical mistake tho, it was supposed to be "for looking like a dumbass, kids." i missed the "," rather than making a plural by mistake. i just couldn't be bothered to correct it.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by diekund on 10-28-2003 09:47 PM:

i never said tcr was better that ctp, i highly respect ctp for all their extremely high qulity TS's, but recently they havent been doing so well, most of their releases havenmt been ts's and their aint been good really. but people always talk about waiting for a centropy release and that everything else is shit without checking them out. they need to give other groups a chance, VideoCD and TCR are doing really well as groups just now and deserve their respect


Posted by psyche on 10-28-2003 09:52 PM:

I saw swat before so I knew I was judging the correct film. And the sample is suppose to be just that, a sample of the final encode (don't get mad at me for CTP packing the wrong release but the right sample). Don't give me that "judging by samples = lame" crap, as if you've never judged a release by it's sample. I'm sure you completely DL and watch every release in it's entirety before you give your comments right pHo? At least the first post in this thread is informative instead of the usual "oh, this is cool... ctp you rock" posts. Just admit I'm right for once and you had to retaliate before making a fool of yourself. I don't care about the previously deleted post as long as it was read


Posted by pHo on 10-28-2003 10:04 PM:

quote:
At least the first post in this thread is informative instead of the usual "oh, this is cool... ctp you rock" posts


you're fucking kidding right? you're telling people that its perfectly fine, when its not even the right film!

yeah, REALLY useful mate. *sigh*

and no, i don't tend to use the comments section at all, doesn't really interest me to try and show off i've seen something, when the majority of posts are by people who haven't. like you when i do judge the odd film, i tend to do it after i've watched it. you wont noticed many 5/3/???? from me or whatever.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by G-Unit on 10-28-2003 10:05 PM:

http://us.yesasia.com/en/PrdDept.as...videos/did-106/



hey..i like hk flims...

i'll download it still..

lmao...

__________________

" Politics is war without bloodshed, while war is politics with bloodshed. "


Posted by psyche on 10-28-2003 10:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
you're fucking kidding right? you're telling people that its perfectly fine, when its not even the right film!

yeah, REALLY useful mate. *sigh*

and no, i don't tend to use the comments section at all, doesn't really interest me to try and show off i've seen something, when the majority of posts are by people who haven't. like you when i do judge the odd film, i tend to do it after i've watched it. you wont noticed many 5/3/???? from me or whatever.

Read my first post again, nowhere did I say the release was perfectly fine. I commented on the "quality" of the release which vcdquality.com split into video/audio/movie quality ratings, nowhere on the rating list does it say "video/audio/movie/bin image contained in rars". I can tell you don't use the comments section because it isn't about trying to show off what I've seen, it's about informing the end user about the quality of a release. Too bad CTP fucked up because the quality was decent, cry me a river somewhere else because you posted a reply to my first comment without checking the sample dir yourself which you probably assumed was the wrong movie like every other follower here. That remark was as useful as... well, nothing.


Posted by Cable Boy on 10-28-2003 10:51 PM:

Acidcrash stfu newb. Centropy gets the most respect in the scene and they deserve it. They have put out the best releases in the past. Just cause they have a error or to dont blaim them, go run your damn mouth elsewhere!!

if u go by the sample im gonna say
7/8/7


Posted by labrat1 on 10-28-2003 10:54 PM:

LOL
opps

its a movie called together

__________________

L A B _ R A T


Posted by prevch on 10-28-2003 11:03 PM:

who was it that releases a FIFA game as matrix cd2?

:: yer probably thinkin of TEG who released a version of Fifa as CD2 of an animated movie a few years ago, but its name i've forgotten.. damnit! hehe it'll come to me when im just about to fall asleep i know it... pHo


Posted by impossible on 10-28-2003 11:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
yes , and judging by a sample really tells you if the movies correct doesn't it. judging by samples = lame way to get on the forum first if you ask me.

oh and i didn't delete your post if you were wondering, but i saw it. you pointed out the wrong grammatical mistake tho, it was supposed to be "for looking like a dumbass, kids." i missed the "," rather than making a plural by mistake. i just couldn't be bothered to correct it.



Well if judging the release by the sample is lame, then what the fuck would be the use of having a sample. It's pretty much understood that over half the people who vote are judging on the sample included with the release. Fact is, VCDQ wouldn't be filled with so many people talking about the release if it wasn't for samples, and obviously VCDQ wouldn't even be what it is without samples (where ya gonna get the jpg). So since judging the release by the sample is so lame in your opinion, why don't we just get rid of all the sample jpgs and leave this forum to the "true" people who actually have the time and give a fuck enough to download the whole release, of every release, and comment on it.


Posted by pHo on 10-28-2003 11:49 PM:

well we have sample.jpgs and we shout at people for using them as basis to vote on don't we?

i have no problem with people posting based on samples, but say so. say "i viewed the sample, and it looks fine" rather than making out you're mr 0sec and better than the next IRC kiddy.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by psyche on 10-28-2003 11:59 PM:

LOL, sure put words in my mouth (my post did not remotely taunt anyone as if I was a 0sec kiddie like other forum members posting their dl speed or babbling about their sites, etc.). From doing a user search, the only time you post anything in the comments thread is to flame users/posts/groups so why don't you create a forum section called "flamers" and be the first to post there and save the rest of us from hearing your bs so we can get back to judging the quality of releases. *Poof* be gone... or you can keep trying to save yourself with lame excuses.


Posted by Bullet on 10-29-2003 12:02 AM:

ppl pls.

Lets quit this senseless thread now. I also have to look good at the sample be4 i saw it wasnt swat. And u dont expect this from a group lik ctp. Just a mistake;..can happen. So be friendly to eachother and both say sorry lol

as for the rls;..i d/l and watched it lol. Nice flic i must say. Really

7/7/7


Posted by pHo on 10-29-2003 12:03 AM:

or, if you don't like the way i run the place, tell me to delete your account and walk away.

you looked dumb for saying how GREAT it was, when it wasn't even the right film. you're the dumbass, not me.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by psyche on 10-29-2003 12:13 AM:

I didn't say I didn't like the way you run the place but if you're going to criticize someone, do it with merit instead of breaking your own rules which were presented when signing up for this forum. And no I don't look dumb for saying how GOOD the quality was because when it's repacked, my statement judging the actual S.W.A.T. encode and not an improperly packed release will stand. You just made yourself a prime example of when to bite your tongue before it turns into useless bicker, so keep the flaming off the board. I'm squashing it there, you can keep name calling if you want but I'll just be redundant so I won't waste my time or my account.


Posted by pHo on 10-29-2003 12:15 AM:

errr excuse me??

are you fucking telling me what to do on my own fucking board now??

i think being admin makes the rules not apply to me. lemme check.... nope, don't apply.

now stfu, i have a headache and i've got other things to sort on here than bicker with idiots.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by psyche on 10-29-2003 12:16 AM:

exactly, point proven.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM.
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.