Show all 46 posts from this thread on one page
|
Show all 46 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Catch Me If You Can *iNTERNAL* - DVD SCR - V4F (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=13246)
just what i needed. hells yeah v4f
why?
Fuckin homos Startin group wars baha good luck you screener season losers.
Well the nfo seems to state that tcf encodes like shit ... bold statement.
'TCF can't encode for jackshit, so here's our internal rip to save the day. Better luck next time fella's'
Ummm. TCF's version was excellent and quicker then yours.
Why did V4F waste their time encoding this?
My guess is that because the TCF release was PAl. But I can't complain about the quality or speed of their release.
Funny, I just finished getting the TCF release. Seeing as it will take a while for this to get out on IRC and usenet, is there any way I can encode this to NTSC? Will TMPGenc work?
well. i agree with them TCF cant encode
I am The President of Cookie World.. and We like cookies, chocolate ones... :-) .. btw, TCF is better...
made up .nfo
thats not the original nfo, prob edited buy an upset admin..
real nfo:
code:
Û Rip-Info Û ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ Video Bitrate - 2095 Audio Bitrate - 224 Video Resolution - 480 x 480 Standard - NTSC * Please Do not Mind the Screw up On the SFV for CD1 we checked it and extracts just perfectly, enjoy the film* Û Group Information Û ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛ Wazup!! You think you can be in V4F? Here is your chance, we are looking for people that live in Malaysia/Asia/USA and have access to Un-Released TS, SCR, and DVD's. We are also looking for T3+, 20+ gig dumps!! We DO NOT need any couriers at the moment so please, do not ask. If you think you can be helpful to us, or can donate computer equipment, please email us at [email protected].
v4f wouldnt post something like that in their nfo.
they are not that stupid
If V4F did say that well its not gonna get them the respect that TCF have built up.
On the NTSC thing. coming from the UK and being in the PAL Region i was very grateful for a PAL Release not that it bothers me, i have a convertor neway.
BiG_Uk
that sucks 
that there is no jpeg but i guess since its a screener 
we dont really need one.....
dk
__________________
Keep It Brutal
FOR THE LAME ASS PERSON WHO TOOK V4F'S NFO AND RE-WROTE IT IS PRETTY PATHETIC. THE CENTURIES THAT V4F HAS BEEN HERE, THEY HAVE NEVER BASHED ANYONE, OR HATED ON ANOTHER GROUP. FOR AL THOSE THAT CONTINUE TO SUPPORT US THANK YOU. AND IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE *REAL* NFO, YOU KNOW WHERE TO FIND IT.
not sure there was much of a reason for another release. the tcf one was ok. Oh well I suppose its internal. As for the divx issue, i didn't think pho was a troll. Divx/xvid is a superiour format to the bitrate hungry svcd. I've always found divx movies look quite well. Also watching a widescreen movie on a 19" monitor makes little difference to watching it on the 21" tv we have. Svcd is handy for dvd players but mpeg 4 ones will be afforordable pretty soon. Also pho, divx can have multiple audio tracks and removable subtitles (ever heard of dvobsub).
why this????? the tcf version was fine
__________________
quote:
Originally posted by deftones6
How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????
CENSORED
Well apparently in the rush to get all the flame wars over divx removed from this topic my previous comments concerning the inflammatory remarks in this .nfo were removed. I see several comments that those remarks were fake and that this nfo has been altered. If that is the case then why is the fake nfo still linked off the main page ?
Get us the right nfo linked before more people read this and get pissed over something that is not even real.
TCF's encode was pretty good I watched it last night and didnt notice anything other then minor imperfections. I saw the sample of V4F and didnt think it was any better but I saw it on the monitor not the 52" that I watched TCF version. BTW thats fucked up what was done to the nfo, whats the point just drags your REP down when you deface a groups nfo!
V4F Vid Bitrate - 2095 Rez - 480 x 480 NTSC
TCF Vid Bitrate - 2190kbit avg. 2450kbit max. Rez - 480 x 560 PAL
P.S. Jebus! STFU, all of you! The last like 10 post have had nothing to do with the rls at all. Why do you give a damn about what format others use. Each format has it's own pluses and minuses so pick whats best for you and let others do the same or make a new thread (Divx/Xvid vs X/SVCD).
Timing...
Ignore my P.S. comments on the post above. The thread has been cleaned since written. TY
I wouldnt diss TCF they have always given us good stuff. I have never gotten a release by you guys, other than this one of course, but all of the TCF movies I have are great quality and always encoded nicely. Your internal rip is not bad, but dont diss the other group just because they got it before you. You could have just said you think yours is better because it is NTSC or something, but saying their encodes are shit is pretty gay.
TCF owns the SVCD scene easily.
DVL owns the DIVX scene easily.
nuff said.
this was not off their own source, they re-encoded.
lamers, flaming tcf, when they recoded ;-/
hmm, changing the .nfo is pretty lame, no reason to give groups bad reps they dont deserve, let them earn that themselves 
i could almost understand if it wasnt internal, but it being internal no reason to flame group, now, on the quality of the release, sample seems about the same as tcfs, it is ntsc and not pal which is good i guess but wouldnt be reason to have proper, i think internal is fine, good realease, no need for flaming, pretty gay of vcdquality to change the .nfo 
:: whoever did it certainly didn't do it on our behalf, i dont know who did it they haven't made themselves known yet. besides, it might've been doctored before it arrived at vcdq central so im not sayin nuttin -pHo
edit: ya sorry to accuse vcdquality, whoever edited it tho is pretty lame
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA. v4f ? who the fuck are you ? Don't go around dissing the group which supplied us with the release of the year in 2002. Voted in theworldcharts (www.theworldcharts.de). (can you say plug ? 
. Take your flaming nfo and shove it up your arses newbs. If you start a war you should release more than one release every......well ever.
--==HcC==--
__________________
--==HcC==--
well this release is the same exact release as the tcf one, only that this release is encoded differently, slightly better. for video, i give u a 9, sound a 9, and the movie a 8. for v4f reputation for ripping off another group in addition to badmouthing a fellow TCF group, i give u a 10 for being FUCKING RETARDED.
why do u people care :/
its internal.. so obviously thye knew they couldnt do a proper.. and why do u care that theres another realese.. im gonna say it just like everyone else does and probaly get shot for it but ITS FREE DAMNIT JUST TAKE IT OR GO WAIT FOR IT AND BUY IT UR SELF grr.. people from VCDquality and isonews realy piss me off with there stupidity infact most of the scene does.. its pretty pathetic that u cant just appreciate wut these people do for u rather then rape them when they release something.. gee golly 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by HcC
If you start a war you should release more than one release every......well ever.[QUOTE]
01/05/2003 DVD SCR Chicago V4F 9.3 / 8.6 / 8.8
Not that this other highly rated release gives anyone the belivability to dis TCF . Just wish someone at vcdquality would change their nfo if it really is a fake.
Maybe it's just me, but I experienced a few problems with the TCF released. Major glitches near the end of cd3, last 15 mins was horrible. Audio out of sync + freezes. The picture was also pixelated *some scenes*.
Get this release if you haven't burned the TCF version yet, just for safety.
Looks great.
8/8/7
lol
come on guys.......... you can do better than TCF encodes like shit cant you? pffft
I got CD1 of this just to compare it to TCF's and the differences are minimal, i personally prefer the TCF release, cause i prefer Pal, but its hardly noticable, even on a 36" Widescreen TV.
The NFO editing is pretty shitty and is obviously someone trying to start some sort of group war.
If you have the TCF version and your TV and DVD player dont mind PAL then stick with it, if you have neither then it depends on what format you prefer.
:::Maybe it's just me, but I experienced a few problems with the TCF released. Major glitches near the end of cd3, last 15 mins was horrible. Audio out of sync + freezes. The picture was also pixelated *some scenes*.
Get this release if you haven't burned the TCF version yet, just for safety. ::::::
I got the same problem.. I'm gettin the V4F one right now...
quote:
Originally posted by HcC
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA. v4f ? who the fuck are you ? .
--==HcC==--
quote:Apparently you are feeding off what every other hater is throwing at u, TCF's release was perfectly fine, no pixelation/out of sync/sound drops/freezes/etc. If you notice the ones who complained about it were probably newbies or rival group members since the majority were new posters with 1 or 2 posts. V4F's is a good alternative for people who can't play PAL but the image quality itself is not as good as TCF's so no point in dissing TCF since their release played perfectly on my Apex AD-5131 and Pioneer DV-434. People need to learn how to troubleshoot their problems before they blame it on these groups (but when it is the group's fault then I guess it's ok to burn them in hell) on perfectly working releases. Nice Job V4F, but I'll stick with my current copy.
Originally posted by Driven
Man your a fucking newb. I love all these idiots who come on this site start talking trash about a group when they have no clue what they are talking about. First off V4F has been around for a long time and has always released quality dvdrips. They are not some new group to the scene. Also this is an Internal release. Its not a proper so there is no need for "Why is this out" or "This was already released". Second off Vcdquality change their nfo which is really scummy. I thought vcdq was better than that and didnt have to be on the same level as isonews. Finnaly TCFs release no matter how amazing you think the group is or how great their other releases were their Catch Me If You Can had problems. CD3 completly fucks up, audio is out of sync at some points, and there were a few pixelated scenes. Next time you newbs want to talk shit make sure you know what your talking about.
Give me a break with this internal crap. An internal release should just be spread internally? So why label it internal and release it to the fuckin world? Once you can answer this question, then you have room to talk.
quote:
Originally posted by KevN2002
Give me a break with this internal crap. An internal release should just be spread internally? So why label it internal and release it to the fuckin world? Once you can answer this question, then you have room to talk.
quote:
Originally posted by Twista
:::Maybe it's just me, but I experienced a few problems with the TCF released. Major glitches near the end of cd3, last 15 mins was horrible. Audio out of sync + freezes. The picture was also pixelated *some scenes*.
Get this release if you haven't burned the TCF version yet, just for safety. ::::::
I got the same problem.. I'm gettin the V4F one right now...
__________________
retired from the scene, but still leechin!
well v4f is beating tcf quality wise but prob not for the long run
This release works for me
Since i'm a ntsc user and all pal movies get distorted on my tv I will go for this one. If i was going to watch it on the computer only it wouldnt matter which version.
I dont give a crap about who is first or second or third. I give props to all groups who releases in ntsc.
I noticed that there is a release by some dude named NiNJA (not me) who released a widescreen version of catch me if you can and that the TCF version isn't... is this version widescreen? I haven't seen the sample or any pics. I prefer WS over FS thats why I'm asking.
FAGGOTS
First off i'm staff. So its not like I just come to this site to post shit about newb groups who flame. Secondly.....staff do not change nfos. They post whatever is sent so don't blame us. Last... Driven better research who you talk shit about before you do it.
__________________
--==HcC==--
The tcf version is widescreen, 1.85:1 to be exact. Watched it on a 52" 16x9 rear projection hi def television with a US dvd player and it was perfectly great.
quote:
Originally posted by ArchdemoN
TCF owns the SVCD scene easily.
DVL owns the DIVX scene easily.
Re: FAGGOTS
quote:http://www.vcdquality.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12546
Originally posted by HcC
First off i'm staff. So its not like I just come to this site to post shit about newb groups who flame. Secondly.....staff do not change nfos. They post whatever is sent so don't blame us. Last... Driven better research who you talk shit about before you do it.
__________________
This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."
____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________
.
Good flick, and a true story to boot. I usually can't stand Dicaprio, but i liked this one. Christopher Walken and Tom Hanks were also excellent in this one.
9/9/10
NICE ONE!!
Well done x
Excellent quality, good movie, worth the download. Played well in my stand alone dvd player.
9/9/8
__________________
quote:
Originally posted by vcd fogie
sounds like a cd burner problem my friend. i had the same problem with an old creative 8x burner. i got a 48x burner at best buy for 30 bucks (with rebates) and have not had the same troubles since.
i watched the TCF rls on my buddy's 1200 lumen projector at his work, onto a 120 inch super bright screen. the rip was inredible. hardly any micro blocks at all. if for some reason PAL svcd's dont work on your system, go for the V4F. otherwise, the TCF looks/sounds perfect
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45 AM. | Show all 46 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.