VCDQuality Forums - diff between + -?

Show all 6 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- Computer and Audio/Video help (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=56)
-- diff between + -? (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=67286)

Posted by kingcyrus on 11-20-2005 04:45 PM:

diff between + -?

I guess I never noticed when they started coming out with +r's.. whats the difference?

reason I'm asking is that I'm getting a dvd burner and probably going to buy a 50 pack of dvd-r's, but they have 50 pack dvd+r's for the same price, the burner im getting will burn both, my dvd player is a couple years old so im thinking i should get dvd-r.

Posted by The CandyMan on 11-20-2005 05:46 PM:

From www.answerbag.com:

quote:
DVD+R is a dvd disc that allows multiple layers for one disc where as dvd-r only allows one layer. They will not compete to become the de Facto standard, because they are both here to stay. Multi layer DVD+R can allow extra capacity per disc than DVD-R hence its high cost!

quote:
DVD-R:
Benefits: Better DVD playback compatiblity within home DVD players.
Drawbacks: Older technology and less money behind the format means that they come out with faster media and burner technology slower. You will frequently see DVD burners that will support (for instance) 16X DVD+R and only 8X DVD-R.

DVD+R:
Benefits: Faster speeds, more inovations like Double Layer discs (8.5 GB)
Drawbacks: Will not play is some home DVD players. If you know your home DVD player will play DVD+Rs then there is no reason to not use them.

I've always have used -r as I was told they play better on most dvd standalones, which seems to be true from the above statement. Your best bet is try them both and see which one you prefer.

__________________

Posted by pHo on 11-20-2005 05:54 PM:

that second quote box makes me laugh... what utter rot!

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by The CandyMan on 11-20-2005 06:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
that second quote box makes me laugh... what utter rot!

I wondered about that too, since the dvd burners maintain the same burn speeds for either format, ie. a newer 16x will burn both at that speed, not -r at 12x and +r at 16x. So more than likely, that is bs. As for +r, I've never tried them, but then I've had nothing but great results with -r in all my players.

__________________

Posted by marshallar on 11-27-2005 11:02 PM:

the first quote made me laugh, since both formats are available as dual layer. My preference is -r because they never fail me with my set top player

Posted by sailorboy on 12-17-2005 07:49 PM:

Having been the proud owner of the first DVD burner for my PC (a whole whopping 1 speed and +format) i have seen this debate echoed in all forums. Which one is best? Well. I used to be an avid supporter of the plus format as the discs could be burnt at 2.4 speed and the minus at 2 speed (going back a few years here guys :-) ) but the real problem with plus is that the home DVD players generally turn their nose up at them. As most cheap players use Panasonic parts the cheaper players tend to perform with minus format. (panasonic were the proud inventers of plus and phillips coined in on the plus). BUT for all round PC/DVD Domestic/PS2/XBOX compatability the minus wins hands down.

For whatever reason you need to burn to disc, i would say that the minus format rocks and the plus format sucks big donkey dicks.

The real debate should be which speed is the most reliable for burning DVD Data. If i burn at 12-16 speed i get terrable results yet at 6-8 speed i get fantastic results.

Datawrite forever

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Show all 6 posts from this thread on one page