VCDQuality Forums - Suspect Zero *NTSC* *R3* - DVDRIP

Show all 13 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- Suspect Zero *NTSC* *R3* - DVDRIP - TGP (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=59997)

Posted by IRC_Moviefan on 03-18-2005 04:40 PM:

Suspect Zero *NTSC* - DVDRIP - TGP

Asian PDVD labled Region 3 NTSC Retail .... boooooo

AVOiD!

2/2/?

Posted by manofice on 03-18-2005 07:59 PM:

NUKED ][ asian.pdvd.crap ]

Posted by JoshNya on 03-18-2005 08:32 PM:

Volume Name SUSPECT_ZERO
Application id
Implementation id DVD Shrink
Recording Date/Time (mm/dd/yyyy) 3/18/2005 4:54:09

OMG Its getting to be a frenzy of Shrink groups!

Posted by IRC_Moviefan on 03-18-2005 08:53 PM:

Lazy and need to win races ... nuff said , i usually wait for the BHP iNTERNAL's few weeks later

Posted by porco556 on 03-19-2005 12:06 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by IRC_Moviefan
Lazy and need to win races ... nuff said , i usually wait for the BHP iNTERNAL's few weeks later

BHP has pretty bad picture quality most of the time, especially on their *complete* releases. It's most likely CCE, but too many extras just kill picture quality.

Posted by Kick on 03-19-2005 04:17 AM:

For me i dont give a damn in the world what groups use to rip the film?!

i myself use dvd shrink and think its brilliant the quality and lets face it an ordinary person watching a film ripped by dvd shrink aint gonna go huh this aint got that bitrate and that frames not as good as what it should be maybe im wrong by saying this but hell i know loads off ppl that use it and no one complains so really why should groups be nuked for using shrink???

what every1 wants a 100% perfect quality dvd well go buy the original then! Not saying anymore anyways on this release great thanks TGP

9/9/6

Posted by JoshNya on 03-19-2005 05:24 AM:

App / Cost / Effort / Time
----------------------------------------------------
DVDShrink / Free / One Click / 30-40min
CCE / 10-20k + / knowledge / 4-6 hours

do the math....

Posted by porco556 on 03-19-2005 06:58 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Kick
For me i dont give a damn in the world what groups use to rip the film?!

i myself use dvd shrink and think its brilliant the quality and lets face it an ordinary person watching a film ripped by dvd shrink aint gonna go huh this aint got that bitrate and that frames not as good as what it should be maybe im wrong by saying this but hell i know loads off ppl that use it and no one complains so really why should groups be nuked for using shrink???

what every1 wants a 100% perfect quality dvd well go buy the original then! Not saying anymore anyways on this release great thanks TGP

9/9/6

From my understanding, the release was actually nuked because it isn't a retail R3, it was a PDVD (which is a telecine or high quality telesync). The whole DVD-Shrink came after the initial nuke, and was prolly just used to remove extras, as the NFO said "untouched" video.

But DVD-Shrink really doesn't look too good when you get a larger image and under higher compression rates. On a standard home CRT TV, you'll probably not even bat an eye, but anything larger with at least a 720P resolution (like most rear projection TVs out there now), you'll really notice the difference.

Posted by Kick on 03-19-2005 02:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JoshNya
App / Cost / Effort / Time
----------------------------------------------------
DVDShrink / Free / One Click / 30-40min
CCE / 10-20k + / knowledge / 4-6 hours

do the math....

Ok m8 well I have a 3ghz processor, 1gb ddr and decent graphics not that it really matters and it takes me just over 2 hours to do a full analysis of say a 6gb dvdr and to encode. Now if I knocked off the features and stuff then I wouldn’t be touching the quality and quite a few times this has happened, with groups that have released films using dvd shrink just to remove protection. Then why should they be knocked for using dvd shrink??? When really they haven’t touched the quality but just removed the protection. I for one always keep features etc and have watched quite a few of these type of dvds on a 44” rear projected screen and haven’t seen any problems…

Posted by JoshNya on 03-19-2005 10:14 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Kick
....I for one always keep features etc and have watched quite a few of these type of dvds on a 44” rear projected screen and haven’t seen any problems…

If you like DVD Shrink and see no problems with it, then thats your taste in quality. No matter what I say will change your preferences.
Personally I enjoy better then that, and I enjoy professional work done with professional tools (just like hollywood uses).
So if you can't see a difference, then your in good shape in d/l DVD Shrink releases. But personally, I dont think its worth my time/effort/credits to download something a 10 year old can do on a free program that looks like crap to me.

my .02

Posted by Redemption198 on 03-20-2005 01:51 AM:

Im not sure why the quality of DVD Shrink video is being discussed here, especially when this is supposed to be Untouched.

I agree on people not noticing the differences on a standard CRT, especially as i still know alot who still have 21" 4:3 TV's, and think DVD-Shrink is perfect, but i personally notice everything and i only have a 36" CRT (not keen on Plasma or Rear Projection, the quality is still pretty poor) though DVD Shrink does have a place, beit Remving the first audio stream or Re-encoding Menu's.

Posted by graham23s on 03-21-2005 01:42 AM:

Couple of things that's buggin me about this release first off

1)DVD Shrink makes the video 4.36gb this one is 4.01gb how did they make it go so low

2)If this is a TS encoded to DVD like a lot of pdvd's are how come they have all the menu's,scene selection etc

Cheers

Graham

Posted by Furius on 03-22-2005 08:17 PM:

Best to forget this release and grab Suspect.Zero.PAL.DVDR-ALLiANCE instead.

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:32 PM.

Show all 13 posts from this thread on one page