VCDQuality Forums
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- Stealth *NTSC* *R1* - DVDRIP - JKR (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=67216)


Posted by X69 on 11-15-2005 12:29 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

9 DOWNLOAD AT YOUR HEARTS CONTENT HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by pablo_escobar on 11-15-2005 01:42 PM:

This release should be nuked for low bitrate. I like JKR, but for some reason they always leave all the audio tracks on their releases. This release has 5.1 English, DTS English, French 2.0, and Thai 5.1 audio. Leaving the DTS, French, and Thai ate up over 1,200 MB of space and resulted in an average bitrate of 2957 which is below the scene required standard of a 3000 average bitrate. I don’t understand why JKR doesn’t strip the unneeded audio tracks, this is a very simple task. At least they stripped all the extras.


Posted by p0tsm0ke on 11-15-2005 05:30 PM:

great rls. good movie. all was kept thats good for people that want to watch it in other SUBS and AUDIO.
again all the other rls of the movie didt even cover all the audio that was on this R1. THANKS JKR for the great RLS and keep up the great work.

to the people that bitch. get up off your ass and start doing something about it then. till then shut up and sit down and ride it like it is

__________________
New PC OH SHIT <-----
P4 HT 3.0 ghz / 1256 DDR 3200 RAM / 500 IDE WD HD / 160 SATA WD HD / 500 IDE WD HD = 1000+ GIGS GSA-H22/ NEC 3530A DL / Windows XP pro Sp3 all the updates

32" LCD Olevia
XBOX 1.0 HD CABLES :P x2 5053 / x2 4983.06 160 gig running apps / emus / a game or to
XBOX 360 samsung drive with current firmware
--> there is no need to burn when u got it setup correct :P


Posted by porco556 on 11-15-2005 10:08 PM:

Too bad about the bitrate. I'm with Pablo on this one. Going to keep the R3 myself. I guess the next question is, will there be a proper? Personally I wouldn't mind one, but not sure if it's technically warranted to have one...


Posted by cadillact on 11-16-2005 01:10 AM:

So where did the bitrate go

The R3 from TGP was untouched with 2 x 5.1 streams and bitrate of around 5700 average according to the NFO

So if this is just two more streams with a DTS and a 2.0
for a 1000.

Where are the 1700 if this is below 3000 average ?


Posted by porco556 on 11-16-2005 02:20 AM:

Re: So where did the bitrate go

quote:
Originally posted by cadillact
The R3 from TGP was untouched with 2 x 5.1 streams and bitrate of around 5700 average according to the NFO

So if this is just two more streams with a DTS and a 2.0
for a 1000.

Where are the 1700 if this is below 3000 average ?


Well, the TGP release can't be 5760kbit/sec average because that would make video alone 5104MB (5700x121x60/8/1024) + 1 5.1 stream and the thai 5.1 stream is another 794MB. So I dunno where that info came from. The actual TGP video bitrate +/- a bit is 3933kbit/sec.

As for the JKR release, it is really packed. DTS track alone at 768kbit/sec, 5.1 tracks are 448kbit and 2.0 tracks are typically 192kbit. It does add up pretty quick, especially on a 121 min movie.


Posted by elamericano on 11-16-2005 02:44 AM:

Very very pixelated in action scenes
Audio 10(dts ownz)
Video 4
Thnx for the release JKR


Posted by porco556 on 11-16-2005 05:57 AM:

HMM... Here is a clip from IGN's review of the video quality:

The Video
Stealth is presented in 2.40:1 anamorphic widescreen preserving aspect ratio of the original theatrical release. While one might expect that a transfer of a new or recent film would preserve or improve upon the original image quality of the material, this DVD offers a terrible transfer full of pixilation, macroblocking and archiving.

... (skipped the rest)

Score: 5 out of 10

--

So, pixelation is even in the untouched (unless IGN is using the JKR release for their review ). So Joker might not be fully responsible for the encode afterall. NOW don't get me wrong, re-encoding artifacting makes worse, blurrier artifacts, but at the same time it was there from the source and not added by them.

I'm now definitely sticking with the R3 myself. It is IMO better than this one (but that's just me).


Posted by DeViT on 11-16-2005 10:20 AM:

This rls sounded dodgy in the first place and now the DVD9 has surfaced it is more obvious. The subs give it away, this is no R1. The R1 DVD9 has english, french and spanish subs.

The lack of info in the nfo also had me questioning this rls, doesn't say whether is was re-encoded or if it was at what bitrate.

__________________
www.dvdrfixes.com


Posted by movieman187 on 11-16-2005 01:19 PM:

The Region 1 and Region 3 retail's of this movie are exactly the same. Same menu, same audio tracks, same subs, same extras (or lack thereof), and the same video transfer. Get the R3 for maximum quality.


Posted by JoshNya on 11-17-2005 02:11 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by movieman187
The Region 1 and Region 3 retail's of this movie are exactly the same. Same menu, same audio tracks, same subs, same extras (or lack thereof), and the same video transfer. Get the R3 for maximum quality.


Yup thats why R1 pre groups didn't touch it. Cause its the same exact release as the R3. This is the second time I seen R3 and R1 the same, other movie was 'The Forgotten'


Posted by ntscuser on 11-17-2005 04:15 AM:

As I posted in the R3 thread, that 'looked' to all intents and purposes like a R1 transfer. That is to say it was transferred from an interpositive and not from a release print like so many unauthorised releases. The NFO for this release refers to the R3 as being "crap" but I can assure everyone it is every bit as good as any R1 transfer I've seen recently. The untouched R3 has absolutely no pixelisation or blocking even on the fast action sequences of which there are many.

Having said that I will be downloading the DVD-9 version at the first opportunity and re-encoding it myself as DTS is very much the icing on the cake for this particular kind of movie.


Posted by porco556 on 11-17-2005 04:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by ntscuser
Having said that I will be downloading the DVD-9 version at the first opportunity and re-encoding it myself as DTS is very much the icing on the cake for this particular kind of movie.

There already was a DVD-5 version of Stealth with untouched video and DTS (came out day after the TGP release... Was released by MPT).

So you'll probably get away with the same thing and you won't have to encode it (unless you want to keep the 5.1 English track in addition to the DTS, then you'll be around 100 megs short from being able to have untouched vid... But the menu is 86 megs You can always drop that... Might be REALLY tight)


Posted by ntscuser on 11-17-2005 03:02 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by porco556
There already was a DVD-5 version of Stealth with untouched video and DTS (came out day after the TGP release... Was released by MPT).

So you'll probably get away with the same thing and you won't have to encode it (unless you want to keep the 5.1 English track in addition to the DTS, then you'll be around 100 megs short from being able to have untouched vid... But the menu is 86 megs You can always drop that... Might be REALLY tight)



There's never a 2.0 channel English soundtrack when you need one! The way I figure it if a friend hasn't got DTS he _probably_ hasn't got 5.1 surround either (an over-simplification I know).

From everything I've read and seen so far the R3 DVD-9 is the one to have and very reasonably priced even where I live.


Posted by porco556 on 11-17-2005 03:56 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ntscuser
There's never a 2.0 channel English soundtrack when you need one! The way I figure it if a friend hasn't got DTS he _probably_ hasn't got 5.1 surround either (an over-simplification I know).

From everything I've read and seen so far the R3 DVD-9 is the one to have and very reasonably priced even where I live.


If you play the 5.1 track, and you've only got stereo L and R cables going out to your TV, then it will be automatically downmixed to 2.0. At least it does it on all the players I've got. Proof being that center channel (speech) comes out both left and right on a TV.

Basically, 2.0 is completely un-needed (unless you're French and it's all you've got available). Unless what I said isn't common (5.1 downmix to 2.0).


Posted by ntscuser on 11-17-2005 06:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by porco556
If you play the 5.1 track, and you've only got stereo L and R cables going out to your TV, then it will be automatically downmixed to 2.0. At least it does it on all the players I've got. Proof being that center channel (speech) comes out both left and right on a TV.

Yes, I understand that. My point was that a dedicated 2.0 English track would take up much less room than 5.1 and for the majority of non-DTS owners not sound so very different either as it incorporates matrixed surround.


Posted by dvd r on 11-17-2005 11:19 PM:

hmm but i think a 2.0 mix is better than 5.1 getting downsampled(or whatever the proper term is) to 2.0.


if someone doesn't have 5.1 i think that would work a bit better for them...


and if some doesn't have 5.1 it's likely they don' even know what dts is ????

really so many people are like dts ??? uh ???


Posted by ntscuser on 11-18-2005 01:40 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dvd r
hmm but i think a 2.0 mix is better than 5.1 getting downsampled(or whatever the proper term is) to 2.0.

if someone doesn't have 5.1 i think that would work a bit better for them...

and if some doesn't have 5.1 it's likely they don't even know what dts is ????

really so many people are like dts ??? uh ???



Yes indeed, a 2.0 channel studio mix is far preferable to a 5.1 DVD player downmix. On top of that, Pro-Logic 2 now restores many of the surround characteristics that were previously exclusive to 5.1 mixes or THX amplifiers. Mind you, if someone has PL2 the chances are they have DTS as well. DD5.1 is now a hopelessly outdated concept.

It would not be so bad if the R1 DVD-9 contained just one redundant DD5.1 mix but it actually contains two, one English and one Thai. I think there is all of two lines of Thai dialogue anywhere in the movie? Within the same space the studio could have included one English, one Thai and one Spanish 2.0 mix which I think would have been of more use to more US residents.


Posted by cadillact on 11-18-2005 06:51 PM:

Well my ears doesnt agree with some of you....

The output to my speakers L + R at my computer in powerdvd sounds way better in 5.1 than in 2.0 but it could be that powerdvd has several sound options and plug-ins.

I have to test if the same will happened if I use my tv.

I always play my dvds in 5.1 even if a 2.0 is available.

I only have stereo(L+R) on my tv so it will be interesting to see what sounds better.


Posted by porco556 on 11-18-2005 09:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by cadillact
I only have stereo(L+R) on my tv so it will be interesting to see what sounds better.

Yep, should be the same. The DD2.0 typically sounds louder for some reason, and usually I have to up the volume really high on some movie's 5.1 mix. But other than that, the same AC3 compression is used for both the 2.0 and the 5.1. If you pre-blender a burrito, cup of milk, peas and chicken, OR if you eat it all separately, it will all... You know where I'm going But I the pre-mix would be less work on your system

One thought left. If you have a 2.0 mix, it is typically 192kbit/sec. The 5.1 mix is 448kbit/sec. Each channel has a dedicated amount of bits for each 5 tracks (sub is on LFE). So technically, the sound for left and right in action/heavy sound scenes may be higher (meaning that an certain sound may get an entire channel, which may be clearer). The 448kbit/sec gets split between 2 speakers. But if it's coming out your TV speakers, then you probably don't care about sound to begin with

Ah well, this topic probably shouldn't be here. We should end it soon before someone ends it for us...


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 PM.
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.