VCDQuality Forums
Show all 13 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Saw 2 *RETAIL* *XviD* - DVDRIP - DiAMOND (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=68523)


Posted by X69 on 02-01-2006 09:44 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by klammerstrich on 02-01-2006 09:47 AM:

LEGACY:
http://img55.imageshack.us/img55/3617/capf235217yp.png


DiAMOND:
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/7202/151020227la.jpg


Another one

LEGACY:
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6109/lsii8fq.jpg


DiAMOND:
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/962/dsii2lr.jpg
I think it speaks for itself.


Posted by Smiel on 02-01-2006 04:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by klammerstrich
LEGACY:
http://img55.imageshack.us/img55/3617/capf235217yp.png


DiAMOND:
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/7202/151020227la.jpg


Another one

LEGACY:
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6109/lsii8fq.jpg


DiAMOND:
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/962/dsii2lr.jpg
I think it speaks for itself.



Does it? I see a difference in color, but in quality?


Posted by dontgiveafuck on 02-01-2006 06:51 PM:

cig burns suck


Posted by cellsoldier on 02-01-2006 07:31 PM:

hm, is the diamond release darker than the legacy one?
or did you mix up the pictures?
btw. first picture bandwidth exceeded....

diamond's saw 2: 9/9/9

cheers

__________________
born to be porn ;P


Posted by bobbish on 02-01-2006 08:21 PM:

picked up legacy's first..diamonds is much better. there are cig burns in legacys and def thought it might have been a good tc when i first got it.
gj diamond
9/8/7


Posted by Redemption198 on 02-01-2006 09:08 PM:

Dont go by those pics, pretty bad comparison.

The Diamond one is a bit darker, but for the better, the Legacy is kinda glarry in light scenes, the colour looks wrong, and its much blurrier than the Diamond one, its also got a shit load of Cig Burns too.

The sample comparison with this shows this well.

9/8/9


Posted by klammerstrich on 02-01-2006 10:20 PM:

I have watched both now.

I would go for the dmd rls too.
It looks much darker on the pics. But in fact the legacy rls is just (by far) too bright.
Maybe the dmd rls is a bit too dark.


8.5/9/8


Posted by movieslover on 02-02-2006 02:45 AM:

hi,
it's my first post
i watched saw II legacy release, it was very good and i liked the fact it is much brighter than most dvdrip movies i see, i was shocked to know it wasn't real retail, anyway it is a very good release and i totally didnt notice the cig burns.


Posted by burlylord on 02-02-2006 04:21 AM:

Thanks for the screen comparison, I am going to stick with the Legacy version, the Diamond ver is too dark.


Posted by JarHead413 on 02-02-2006 05:31 AM:

Plus if it is that bright on a PC moniter, on a TV it would be too bright. At least on mine anyways. It's just the way my moniter is, as well as most i've seen. They are just darker than TV's usually are.

As for release

V-9
S-9
M-....7-8....not as WHOA as the original. But still twitchable to.

__________________
What is love?......baby don't hurt me.....don't hurt me......no more.


Posted by Redemption198 on 02-02-2006 02:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by burlylord
Thanks for the screen comparison, I am going to stick with the Legacy version, the Diamond ver is too dark.


As i said dont go by jpg's they are almost always misleading, when you see the two side by side, this one is far superior, although the AR is way off on both releases though.


Posted by White Rabbit on 02-02-2006 05:44 PM:

im too lazy to be arsed getting another copy of this film, even tho it rules

i never replace dvdscrenners because the warnings dont bother me at all

but this is still nice

9/9/9

thanks DiAMOND but im gonna keep the dvdscr its fine for me

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:

compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.

encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 AM.
Show all 13 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.