VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Jargon, Encoding/Conversion and Burning > any one no why?
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
VCDBITCHES
Dec 2004

PROFESSIONAL ASSFUCKER

any one no why?

any one no why the convertor "WINAVI" processes its video encodes so fast.

i have yet to run in to another convertor with such speed.

a movie that would take 4 or 5 hours in diko/tmpgenc/cce/anything

takes 45 mins to an hour with WINAVI. why

what are they doing in there program that the others dont.
i have converted all forms of formats with record speeds.
dvd convertion takes 1 hour 30 mins. why.

if any one here can explain it would help my under standing.

__________________
PIC of VCDQ mods

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-29-2005 12:25 AM
VCDBITCHES is offline Click Here to See the Profile for VCDBITCHES Click here to Send VCDBITCHES a Private Message Find more posts by VCDBITCHES Add VCDBITCHES to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
gee1556
Aug 2003

wants a new nickname

Good question... but from what I've seen, I get better results with TMPGenc than WinAvi.

With WAvi, I had my converted movies with the audio out of sync.
As for pic quality, I didn't seen much differences...

I'll stick with TMPGenc/VirtualDub combo

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-29-2005 05:45 AM
gee1556 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for gee1556 Click here to Send gee1556 a Private Message Find more posts by gee1556 Add gee1556 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
chiv
Dec 2003

Zippy The Stunt Turtle

ive never had a problem with audio syncing - you using version 6?

as for the original question, really good one, no idea...ive found version 6 gives me awesome results, they look good on the pc, so look VERY impressive (to me) on the television...

it probably runs faster because it cuts some corners - of course that means it wont have a nicer result than the others, but as i said, it still looks damn nice, and it does the trick if i just want to dump an xvid movie onto dvd rw to watch on the tv with friends...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-30-2005 05:46 PM
chiv is offline Click Here to See the Profile for chiv Click here to Send chiv a Private Message Find more posts by chiv Add chiv to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
katsushin
Jan 2005


Zatoichi Sees All

Its fast because it uses a Compressed Domain TRANScoder as opposed to an ENcoder.
simply put:
Mpeg ENcoders work by analysing frames in the stream in relation to each other and then converts the images of the movie into frequencies, using a process called DCT or Discrete Cosine Transform. These frequencies are what facilitate "Compression" thus making the movie a Compressed Domain.
Compressed Domain Transcoders work NOT by returning the frequencies back to images (iDCT) then analysing and re-encoding, but by analysing and changing the DCT data within the compressed domain. That is why it is able to be so much faster. However, depending on the movie you are working with the quality difference can be between none or little all the way to ALOT!
Hope this answers your question.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-31-2005 09:27 AM
katsushin is offline Click Here to See the Profile for katsushin Click here to Send katsushin a Private Message Find more posts by katsushin Add katsushin to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dvd r
Jan 2005


Senior Member

wow kat your answer gets a 10 plus !!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-26-2005 06:46 AM
dvd r is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dvd r Click here to Send dvd r a Private Message Find more posts by dvd r Add dvd r to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
BGspoonz1
Mar 2004

BANNED

Re: any one no why?

quote:
Originally posted by VCDBITCHES
any one no why the convertor "WINAVI" processes its video encodes so fast.
i have yet to run in to another convertor with such speed.
a movie that would take 4 or 5 hours in diko/tmpgenc/cce/anything
takes 45 mins to an hour with WINAVI. why
what are they doing in there program that the others dont.
i have converted all forms of formats with record speeds.
dvd convertion takes 1 hour 30 mins. why.

if any one here can explain it would help my under standing.


ummm, i never had a movie take 4 or 5 hours! I wouldnt let it run that long... TMPG...plus takes me 1hour (regular 1hour50min vid). settings and hardware may play more of a role for you...or convert/encoding from 352x240 to full screen 720x480 can take longer, or added filters, or 1pass/2pass... there are too many parameters to compare encoding/converting speeds unless u state all ur settings and source vid qualities and numbers.

__________________
Remember when u too were a NooB?

Last edited by BGspoonz1 on 03-08-2005 at 09:39 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-08-2005 09:35 AM
BGspoonz1 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for BGspoonz1 Click here to Send BGspoonz1 a Private Message Find more posts by BGspoonz1 Add BGspoonz1 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
katsushin
Jan 2005


Zatoichi Sees All

Re: Re: any one no why?

quote:
Originally posted by BGspoonz1
... there are too many parameters to compare encoding/converting speeds unless u state all ur settings and source vid qualities and numbers.


Id like to know YOUR settings for the speed you described above. What youre saying is that for an NTSC movie encoded originally using forcefilm, you are re-encoding at 44fps(and thats without executing 3:2 pulldown!) or a PAL movie at 45.83fps.
Would you please list your settings in tmpg, your source (xvid/divx,mpg2 svcd, mpg1 vcd) and its frame size (if xvid/divx), your output file format and bitrate and the encoding method used (single pass cbr, two pass vbr or any in between).

Also, since hardware does play a huge role in encoding speed, what proccessor do you have?
Your post has me very curious because in my experience this speed is unheard of in an mpeg encoder. Especially Tmpg which is generally a good deal slower than CCE.
thanks

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-08-2005 12:42 PM
katsushin is offline Click Here to See the Profile for katsushin Click here to Send katsushin a Private Message Find more posts by katsushin Add katsushin to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
FUCKIN_CUNT
Feb 2005


BANNED

quote:
ummm, i never had a movie take 4 or 5 hours! I wouldnt let it run that long... TMPG...plus takes me 1hour (regular 1hour50min vid). settings and hardware may play more of a role for you...or convert/encoding from 352x240 to full screen 720x480 can take longer, or added filters, or 1pass/2pass... there are too many parameters to compare encoding/converting speeds unless u state all ur settings and source vid qualities and numbers.


you are a fucking lier. 1 hour my ass, with tmpgenc slow ass.

what you have 10GHZ processor. on lowest motion with a half of pass. 30 min clips dont count



Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-08-2005 07:18 PM
FUCKIN_CUNT is offline Click Here to See the Profile for FUCKIN_CUNT Click here to Send FUCKIN_CUNT a Private Message Find more posts by FUCKIN_CUNT Add FUCKIN_CUNT to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
manal
Dec 2004

Registered

in all actuallity, on lowest queslity i do encodemovies in a hour myself,thats on interlace no percision and searc acuracy, anyways im on a athlon xp 2200 1.25 gigs of ram and a geforce fx 5500. but im the type of guy that just plops everything tomax quality and leaves it on while i sleep.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-08-2005 11:09 PM
manal is offline Click Here to See the Profile for manal Click here to Send manal a Private Message Find more posts by manal Add manal to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.